Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
.....I used to be white,
but I changed my appearance after getting on the wrong side of the Russian mafia.
Interesting.
Hi, I am Hugh Jass, and I'm joined by award-winning feminist author, Mary Hinge,
who is going to discuss in detail
the lie that just won't go away, after she bores us all with her latest promotion.
Hello, Mary, and welcome.
Hello, Hugh, and thank you.
So what are you plugging this time?
I just want to plug the fact that I will be a guest on "Loose Women" next week.
Loose Women?
You know, the cheap British version of "The View"?
Oh, right.
What will you be talking about on that show?
Well it's Loose Women, and it's on at lunchtime, so no doubt we will talk about sex,
*** size,
shoes, handbags, and what men do in the toilet.
All the usual appropriate stuff for daytime television.
It sounds riveting,
I will be sure to set my Betamax to record it.
Now on with today's show, what are you going to be talking about?
I want to discuss what is known as the "Terminator" lie,
the gender wage gap lie
to be precise.
Why do you call it the "Terminator" lie?
Because it absolutely will not stop.
The fact that we are discussing it in 2010 is proof of this.
Carry on.
Let us start by stating two stone-cold facts,
the first fact is, on average, in most democratic nations, men earn roughly 20% more
than women.
This is an undeniable fact.
What is the second fact?
The second fact is, the gender wage gap does not exist because of any kind of discrimination,
it exists because of the individual choices men and women make.
What kind of choices?
The choice to work in a safe job,
or a dangerous one, the choice to work in a dirty job, or a clean one, the choice to
work where you are exposed to the elements, or indoors protected from the elements, the
choice to do work that involves heavy lifting, or no lifting at all, the choice to work
lots of hours, or hardly any hours at all.
So basically,
women are choosing to earn less than men on average,
by choosing to do you easy,
clean, safe work, as opposed to difficult, dirty, dangerous work
where they are exposed to the elements?
Precisely.
That makes perfect sense to me.
That is because your head is not filled with cobwebs.
So if women earn less than men on average because they choose to,
then where does the lie come in?
The lie is that women earn less than men on average
due to some sort of discrimination, but this could not be further from the truth.
You see, having hundreds of options when it comes to choosing a career
is not in any way, shape,
or form, discrimination, in fact it's quite the opposite.
True that.
Now, if women were not allowed to do the jobs that pay higher wages,
then that would be discrimination, but that is not the case, as there are no barriers in place,
it's just that women in general choose not to go for those jobs.
Again,
that makes perfect sense.
It's obvious to anyone
who doesn't think Christmas is Santa's birthday,
that it's all down to different choices men and women make, but why do some people lie
about it?
Well, obviously feminists and most brain dead women lie about it
because it gives women victim status, and an excuse for their failures.
Others lie about it
because it's hard to admit being wrong, or admit to falling for feminist lies for years.
Then of course there are those men who lie about it, in a pathetic attempt
to make women like them,
intelligent-wise, they are just north
of a doormat at an abandoned house.
That is an insult to doormats.
Are other facts left out when morons try to pass women off as victims?
Absolutely.
Along with the fact that women choose to earn less,
there are other facts that are ignored,
for example,
while men choose to earn more, they sacrifice valuable time with their family by doing so, women
don't, and get more time with their family because of their choices.
It's funny,
they always seem to forget that quality time with their family whenever they try to play
victim to the wage gap.
Any other facts that are deliberately forgotten?
Yes, there is the different pressure on both genders when it comes to employment.
A woman can choose to sit on her farter
after she has kids, and society won't bat an eyelid at her situation,
whereas a man is labeled a deadbeat if he doesn't have a job.
This obviously puts more pressure on men, as it is they who will be judged more harshly
by most of society.
Very true.
Are there any more pathetic tactics
that bobbleheads use
to convince us all that women are victims?
God yes.
There are people who focus on the extremely small minority of men who make millions from
their business,
for example,
Bill Gates, and then claim that most men have jobs like that,
with an income to match, which proves women are discriminated against.
It really is a tactic only adopted by those who don't know the difference between New
York, and new year.
I hear that.
What about the many out-of-court settlements we hear about regarding unfair pay,
why do companies pay out
if they have done nothing wrong?
It's a simple case of mathematics and common sense, as it is far cheaper to pay out of court,
than it is to pay court fees for months,
possibly years.
Also, paying out of court prevents the company's name being dragged through the mud for months,
possibly years.
That makes sense,
but what are these cases based on?
Most of these cases are brought by women
we get paid less than the men they replaced,
but what is not taken into account, is that the man she replaced
was at the company for seventeen years, so obviously she is not going to start on the
same wage as him,
since he put more years into the job.
It's a loophole a lot of women use, they have no real case, just enough of a case
to force an out-of-court settlement,
as these women are not about equality, they are all about the money.
Typical women.
So tell me,
how would feminists do equal pay?
Feminists do equal pay the Wimbledon way, which is to pay women the same as men
for doing roughly two thirds of the work.
Disgraceful.
Should women see the gender wage gap as a positive thing, as it is proof
that women live in a society where they have many options?
Absolutely,
it is a positive thing, and it is so simple,
women choose to earn less than men on average, which results in, surprise, surprise, women
earning less than men on average.
Of course, admitting you live in a free society where you can choose to earn more or less than
your male counterparts,
doesn't fit in with women's desperate need for victim status, so they ignore the many
positives, and focus on the few negatives that they themselves
are to blame for.
What positives do they conveniently forget to mention
when pathetically trying to gain victim status from their own choices?
The positives that come with choosing to earn less include,
easy work, a safe working environment, short hours,
very little stress, more family time, more personal time,
very little chance of being killed on the job,
working indoors away from the elements, short travel distance.
The jobs that pay more,
the ones women choose not to do,
do not come with such benefits, and as such, pay more money.
And what are the negatives?
No need for the plural, Hugh, there is just one negative, and that is the fact
that women earn less than men on average, something they play victim to, and ironically, are
totally responsible for.
So women have it pretty sweet, yet still cry like children over their own choices.
Why am I not surprised?
Because you're a misogynist, Hugh.
Oh right, I forgot.
Well, we will have to leave it there for now,
thank you, Mary for an interesting discussion.
Any time, Hugh.
Before we go, I have a joke for Mary.
Here we go again, let's hear it.
What do you call a feminist
in a wardrobe?
I don't know.
The 1993 hide-and-seek champion.
Until next time,
goodbye.