Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
-Teach the controversy rather than try and censor out the information that shows
that evolution is questionable. -Where did you study science?
-Well see that's the point. Scientists are now claiming that they're
the only ones that can speak on this issue. It's almost like a religion
in which only scientists are allowed to speak and teach on it
and to teach everyone else. Everyone else must believe what the scientists... what
particular scientists... say. Where is the evidence of evolution from one
species to another species?
The macroevolution? There's microevolution within a species,
but not going from one species to another. If we'd gone from that
broad of an evolution, there should be overwhelming tons of material evidence
not just an isolated, uh, thing here or there, but again, there is not evidence.
-Almost every fossil you find is intermediate with something and something else!
-If that were the case, the Smithsonian National... Natural History Museum would be
filled with these examples
but instead they're not. -I just told you about Australopithecus,
*** habilis, *** erectus,
*** sapiens.
By the way, archaic *** sapiens, and then modern *** sapiens.
That's a beautiful series of intermediates. -You're still lacking the material evidence.
-The material evidence is there! Go to the museum and look at it! Have you seen ***
erectus? Have you seen *** habilis? Have you seen Australopithecus?
-What I've seen is that in the museums and in the text books that whenever they claim
to show the evolution from one species to another it relies on
illustrations and drawings, not any material evidence. If they
were in the museums, which I've been to many times, then I would look at them
objectively. There's a variety of opinions across the board among
those who may not by completely into the hard core ideas of evolution.
There are those who believe in different
levels of evolution within creation.
And that really shows kind of a creative independence within our movement
that seems to be a bit lacking among those who believe in evolution and ONLY
evolution. And the ad "hominen" attacks... ad "hominen" attacks... ad "hominen" attacks...
ad "hominen"... It's the hard core evolutionists that reject the idea of a creator that
then pave the foundation for very brutal societies. Communism was based on atheistic
beliefs and evolutionary beliefs. The atheistic belief,
the evolutionary belief, is that you're unnecessary and unneeded if you cannot
provide something for society. -Can you point to any positive scientific
evidence in favor of creation?
-I think that the fact that... as you pointed out, DNA, I think DNA helps
to show that each one of us are individuals
-Yes, but they have to be individuals for evolution to work, I mean...
-Uh, I... I... I don't think that's the case. -Well, I'm very sorry, but it is!
-We don't have good evidence of
positive mutations being the ones that
are then built on because if they're mutations, they're alone.
So in order for something to rise up and have more of it,
you need to have a good base to choose from.
For example, a recessive gene in a person.
Both parents may have brown eyes, and yet a child may have blue eyes, and
that's because there's enough of the gene in their ancestors to have
brought out that recessive gene. The fact that you can have two people,
a man and a woman, could have
thirteen children, sixteen children,
and each one is completely distinct
from one another.
That shows that even though they came from from
a common parentage,
but yet there's still a creative element
for each one of those human beings.
...and one of them is a severely handicapped little girl who can't do
anything for herself.
She can't talk, she can't walk, she can't feed herself.
She can barely sit up.
And when a person, one of the people I was with, turned to me and said "do you believe
in evolution?" and I said,
"I think this little girl is a perfect example example
of why evolution is wrong." -Their hospital care should be taken care of by
the state. That's a liberal principle which I espouse. It's an un-Darwinian principle.
-See, I believe that it's not "a state" because a state is an institution or an entity. It's
human beings that provide care for others.
I think helps to show that people are using their critical factories.
And so we don't need to deny any facts because, uh, we... the facts end up
bearing out, uh... our beliefs. If evolution had occurred, then surely
whether it's going from
birds to mammals, or even beyond that,
surely there'd be at least one evidence! -There's a MASSIVE amount of evidence!
-I don't want to live on this planet anymore.