Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
CNN reporter and anchor were discussing the Tea Party and they had a bit over
argument over terminology let's watch the
turkey patty radicals if you like to kickball abyss of by a electorally
our site they're not going to lose their seats because the redistricting in the
like they more about ideology than
pragmatism all why Michael I mean island for so let's be careful by using the
term radical because a lot of those folks feel like they're standing on
principle today even though they didn't come out and on top in this
a but get to get your question yes so there's CNN taking a strong stand
luck a call radicals you know they're they hold positions of power
and they believe it so how could it be extreme I'm gonna go the other way
I might surprise some folks I actually didn't mind him saying what
ok and I'll tell you why because two for two reasons
at number one a if it was
occupy people and its own principles are they look to bankers have to be held
accountable
it's possible the CNN anchor call some radicals I would like a reporter to say
hey wait a minute actually that's not that had a great right now in that
scenario you would be wrong
inlet scenario the anchor was 100 percent correct
our economy lost twenty four billion dollars because the Tea Party ***
you yeah you just you just falls to put a little
I mean I you look way sea angling for jobs CNN
yes yeah no it looked at your point
I can see the Occupy movement if they had any congressman which they don't
roommate I see any appreciable doing something that people would say oh well
you know they shut the government down whatever it was it across as $24 billion
and I would say that's perfectly fine but to both your points
you're right of course is a POS equipment seekers the Occupy movement
based on polling American people represent
really mainstream views there portrayed by the establishment media's
radical and wild-eyed and I that's for the part was driving my
like hey easy calling everybody radical the writer
but in the Tea Party does not great day
shut down it was it's only four percent
disapproval rating and they wanted to shut down so you know in in
you know although the Tea Party does represent a smaller government which
probably wins a majority
among the american people so I'm just a little reluctant to just categorize
but now we're talking about here i mean we we showed that like dat
being willing to shut down the government to defund Obamacare poll that
six percent among Republicans
even keep most Tea Party people do not like that like
six-percent you can't come up with a policy that's less popular of their
allies in the poor would be more popular than that so that
in this instance at the very least it makes them literally the definition
other extreme
and radicals a personal look at the reporter personal who's the Aussie that
reassured
michael also I here I
yahoo.com at but Jimmy castor the reporter I mean you know it conserves
done
parallel I pray you
but like the brief XC yeah I'll I but like you jack I like the idea
a reporter willing to challenge and anchor on our I just in this case
they get the if the people shut down the government if Ted Cruz is not a radical
then we don't have radicals end up
which is a fair thing to argue but he did not throw grenades or anything like
that he's with much shorter time equivalent a radical I hate government
they wanted funded they love it it's divided
they would like it to occur they would like to shut down to continue they just
%uh
it's just money say day after day after day even though there was a lot of Lucy
I am getting agreement here
it would appear there Jim across it said in this case
I anger so you're saying that because they're actions
were just be radical by the american people based on the polls
but the Tea Party is not necessarily radical as a entire entity
and others along thing to say it before you about the maker point but would that
have been fair
me touch it but it had been said by Michael homes are that's a budget a cost
on the correction
gym because on the correction I mean that's a lot of equivocating like
getting
we find you know I don't necessarily agree but I think that okay
we'll course because you know we're not george bush we can see in the gym a
custom heart
I don't know soul despite their on
but you know I don't know and but it strikes me that calling the
de Partie radical seems fair
but it's also fair to argue it shows the are leaving a biased
totally wrong here yet think as well as planned this is that
um I'm so wary of the establishment
you know ostracizing anything it does not agree with
in this case agree with you guys they're right they were not backed by the pose a
radical according to the polls
action was radical and it led to terrible results
right when the corporate like we're in the we're position being on the side of
a corporatist
right it was a corporatist versus the Tea Party right
and corporations rose in their fury at the end said you're not gonna mess with
the debt ceiling
and the tea-party backed down and then hence they were
look here's the thing if the know the written reasons
freemen the corpus think look the rational people were also on that said
that's why
okay well that's a yet okay a span that's true
but I'd I guess what I'm getting at is that the CNN's the world in
establishment media the world
didn't back us because the rationals were
they back to discuss the corporations were yeah that's true right
and so when they corporate media comes in insert
radical Tea Party when before they were the beloved
Tea Party the mainstream people will go back to that right
and and the powerful important e party that really need to be taken in a town
now the cross corporate America all this on their the radical Tea Party
that's the part that's get me to pause and say well maybe it causes a point