Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
How To Predict The Behavior Of Globalists
by Tyler Durden.
In my last article, 'How Globalists Predict Your Behavior', I outlined the primary method
globalists use to measure public consent, or, public dissent.
The use of macro-analytics and the hyper-monitoring of web traffic is a powerful tool at the disposal
of the establishment for gauging shifts in public consciousness in real time.
For example, in early 2016 the elites were entirely aware of the rise of conservative
and sovereignty movements in the U.S. and Europe.
In fact, the dangers of growing �populism� were all that elitists and their publications
talked about for the first six months of the year.
At first, this notion seemed a little odd to me.
Generally, when globalists are attempting to manage public opinion, they are careful
not to reveal the slightest hint that conservative movements exist beyond an �extremist fringe�.
They certainly never suggest that there is a massive undercurrent of nationalism ready
to topple the globalist structure.
In fact, whenever such movements do arise the establishment is swift to obstruct them
or co-opt them.
I witnessed this first hand during the Ron Paul campaign in 2008 and 2012 � the mainstream
deliberately refused to acknowledge Ron Paul's existence, because attacking him repeatedly
would have been a zero sum strategy that would have given him greater public attention and
free publicity.
I saw it during the Neo-con co-option of the Tea Party, a movement that I was involved
in long before Fox News latched onto it and long before mainstream RINO Republicans not
only jumped on the bandwagon but hijacked the horse.
In a matter of months the Tea Party became a defunct entity, a shell of its former self.
Luckily, most liberty activists simply left it behind and started their own separate groups
and projects rather than being absorbed into the Neo-con fold.
I also saw establishment interference on a local and state level during elections in
Montana.
An associate of mine was running for state office on a liberty platform and was doing
rather well in the polls.
He was approached by a contingent of political elites running as Republicans who told him
in no uncertain terms that he could run on any platform and use any rhetoric he wanted,
but if he won, he would be required to follow THEIR direction.
They even encouraged him to continue arguing for constitutional government in his speeches
and debates, because they felt this was the best way to �sell� his candidacy.
But when all was said and done, he was supposed to stab his constituency in the back and take
orders from the party leadership.
The point is, the elites dominate the political system.
Nothing happens within it without their say.
So, for those same elites to suddenly and openly suggest that �populist movements�
were threatening to overtake the world and destroy the global economy was suspicious,
to say the least.
In order to predict the behavior of globalists and the outcome of future economic and political
events, it is important to understand certain dynamics.
As just described, the establishment has a stranglehold on the political system.
Party politics are a sham built around the false left/right paradigm.
However, certain new dynamics are developing, and you must be able to track them.
The best way to do this is to watch what globalists say within their own publications.
They often reveal their intentions directly or indirectly.
In many cases I think in their arrogance they assume that the masses are too stupid to read
these publications and grasp what is being said.
The most important element of predicting globalist actions is to know what they ultimately want;
to know their ultimate goals.
If you know the specifics of what any group or individual desperately wants, those people
become highly predictable, because there are only so many useful paths to get to any goal.
I have used this method to great effect over the years, so I am not merely presenting a
theory, I have concrete successes to back my position.
For example, just in the past couple of years I correctly predicted the Federal Reserve
taper of QE, I predicted the inclusion of China in the IMF�s Special Drawing Rights
years in advance, I predicted the exact timing of the first Fed rate hike, I predicted the
success of the Brexit referendum when most of the world and the liberty movement said
it was never going to happen, I predicted that the Saudi 9/11 bill would pass, that
Barack Obama would veto it and that congress would override his veto, I predicted that
Hillary Clinton would be the Democratic candidate and that Donald Trump would be the Republican
candidate for president of the U.S. and, I predicted that Donald Trump would win the
2016 election.
Except for the China SDR inclusion, I predicted all of these events many months in advance
and received a heavy amount of criticism each time from people in the mainstream and even
from people in the liberty movement.
Hilariously, as soon as these predictions proved true, some of the same people that
were fervently opposed came quickly out of the woodwork to claim they �saw it coming
all along�.
I suppose this is human nature, but it is a problem because it keeps people from learning
how to better gauge globalist behavior and come to correct conclusions.
My goal in this article is to make EVERY liberty activist adept at predicting globalist driven
events.
So, here is a good place to start:
Learn To Play Chess The elites are obsessed with chess and chess
symbolism.
Many of their strategies develop much like a game of chess develops.
If you don't know how to play chess, I suggest you learn.
You don't have to master the game, but you do need to understand the basic concepts of
winning the game.
For example, if you know the target that your opponent is really pursuing, you can easily
obstruct his efforts because all his movements will become predictable.
If his goal is to take your Queen, and you know this, then he should never be able to
take your queen.
This is why the elites go to great lengths to distract their opponents (meaning us) from
their true target.
They want you to think they are going straight for your King, or your Knight; they want you
focused elsewhere.
They will use feints often.
Another core strategy of chess is the �forced sacrifice�.
That is to say, the best chess players are very good at positioning one of their pieces
so that it threatens two or more of your pieces.
This forces you to sacrifice one piece for the sake of the others.
If they do this often enough, before you know it you have sacrificed your way into defeat.
The globalists ALWAYS have a primary target and a secondary target.
There is always more than one move developing at any given time.
Knowing chess is key to knowing how the globalists think.
Get In Touch With Your Darker Side Going by their behavior and their rhetoric
when they are unguarded, most globalists display highly narcissistic character traits as well
as sociopathy and psychopathy.
It is not enough to research these traits in a clinical fashion, you have to tap into
the darker side of your own psyche, and think as they think.
This means being willing to entertain evil and malicious concepts.
You must be willing to ask yourself - �If I were them, how would I go about getting
what I want?�
Understanding devious and aberrant psychopathic intent goes a long way in making the globalists
predictable.
Remember, many psychopaths are actually highly intelligent and intuitive.
They don't have a moral compass and have lost the voice of conscience, but in order to adapt
they have learned how to fake it.
They are chameleons.
ALL people are inherently capable of evil actions, just as they are inherently capable
of great good.
You don't have to become like the elites, but you do have to go to some ugly places
in your own mind.
An elitist is basically a person who went to those places and discovered that he liked
it there.
Read Globalist Publications As noted above, the globalists have their
own media outlets in which they publish their �views�, such as Foreign Policy Magazine,
The Economist, Bloomberg, Reuters, etc.
Sometimes these views are honest and sometimes they are calculated propaganda.
Again, if you know exactly what the elitist targets are, then you can better discern if
what they are saying is legitimate or a feint to distract you.
I predicted the success of the Brexit and the Trump win based on the knowledge that:
1) The globalists need a large scale crisis in order to drastically change public perceptions
on society and governance.
That is to say, they need to create a crisis so terrifying that people will be willing
to accept a fully centralized global economic system and global governance as a solution.
2) The globalists have already set in motion an economic crisis that cannot be reversed.
It is a crisis that they must avoid blame for at all costs once it accelerates.
3) Conservative and sovereignty principles are the primary threat to the dominance of
globalism.
As long as ideas of individualism, national sovereignty and decentralization exist, globalism
can never truly prevail.
Therefore, obstructing movements based on these principles is not enough.
The globalists must also destroy any positive perceptions of our principles for generations
to come.
4) As stated in the section on chess, the globalists like to use the strategy of forced
sacrifice, in which they threaten two targets simultaneously, or kill two birds with one
stone.
I realized at the beginning of 2016 that all the rhetoric by globalists in their own publications
on the �rise of populism� was staging the groundwork for the success of the Brexit
and the success of Trump.
What better strategy for the establishment than to allow conservative movements to take
the helm of the political and economic ship just as that ship is about to sink?
In this way, the globalists can have the crisis they need, while at the same time scapegoating
conservatives and avoiding blame, and, destroying the image of conservative ideals, perhaps
forever.
Have No Sacred Cows This is a hard one for many people.
We all have certain biases and these biases can blind us to reality.
The overreaching bias within the liberty movement is a desire for heroic leadership.
We have grown up on stories of heroes from George Washington to Thomas Jefferson � grand
statesmen and military giants that crushed tyranny.
The problem is, while men like Washington and Jefferson were indeed instrumental, they
were nothing without the hundreds of thousands of unsung patriots working tirelessly for
freedom on their own.
The founding fathers were not considered the founding fathers until long after the American
Revolution was over.
At the time, they were not thought of necessarily as heroes or even great leaders.
They were just men, like many other men, gambling life and liberty on a cause that was uncertain
at best.
Activists need to STOP looking around for mighty leaders and start taking leadership
themselves in their own way.
If we do end up with another Washington or Jefferson or Paine or Madison, etc., we will
not know who they are until the fight is over and the history books are written.
The globalists take full advantage of the movement's weakness in seeking out and artificially
elevating heroes.
Also, when people have this bias, they end up with blinders when examining such heroes
with any skepticism.
Obviously I am referring to Donald Trump, here.
Sacred cows prevent accurate predictions of major events because a person will refuse
to consider them as a potential negative factor.
Moving Beyond Predictions It is one thing to be able to predict the
outcome of social and political events; it is another matter to do something about them.
In my next article I will outline solutions liberty activists can pursue on their own
and in groups to counter globalist activity.
Predicting their tactics is essential, but acting to disrupt those tactics should be
the ultimate goal.
The globalists believe that even if some of us do manage to decipher their activities
and methods, we will have no means to do anything about them.
They see themselves as the �history makers�, as the men who act.
They see us as the �history watchers�, or the meaningless masses wafting about with
geopolitical tides, helpless and incapable of determining our own destinies.
I believe we will become history makers in due course.
One weakness of the globalists that will sabotage them is their own hubris.
They see people as pawns � but what happens when a piece walks off the chess board completely
and acts in an unpredictable way?
It is this potential alone that will destroy the globalists in the end.