Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
Ok.
Against better judgment, I’ll try this one last time.
This time, with no sarcasm, no parody, no humor whatsoever, since Jarrah White has no
appreciation at all for that sort of thing.
First, I don’t know where Jarrah got the idea that I said that he said that Tidbinbilla
was not NASA’s facility.
I didn’t say that anywhere in my critique of his Exhibit D series.
What I said was that when Jarrah lists the three NASA Deep Space Network stations, located
near the cities of Goldstone, Canberra and Madrid, he doesn’t mention the CITY, “Canberra,”
but substitutes the COUNTRY, “Australia,” in its place.
Jarrah: As I pointed out quite clearly in Exhibit D, the tracking stations in Goldstone,
Australia, and also Madrid, are all owned by NASA, and therefore are not independent
parties as the propagandists have claimed.
Jarrah: Whether it was just Australia, or Goldstone, Madrid, and Australia tracking
the signals, it’s immaterial.
All are NASA facilities.
Although Canberra is in Australia, you can’t use Australia in this statement without changing
its meaning.
I assume that Jarrah changes the wording, so that he can include all Australia’s radio
telescopes, especially Parkes, in this list of NASA owned facilities.
Jarrah: Loosely, I refer to the Australian tracking stations as one because they were
all working together on the same project.
Only the two stations near Canberra were part of NASA’s Deep Space Network.
These were the NASA owned stations at Tidbinbilla and Honeysuckle Creek.
The other NASA owned facilities in Australia are part of NASA’s Manned Spaceflight Network,
which is actually a larger collection of tracking stations.
Parkes was an honorary member of NASA’s Manned Spaceflight Network.
It had to be in order to send information over their hub.
But, Parkes was not owned by NASA, nor was it operated by NASA during the Apollo days.
Jarrah can point to statements on the Parkes and Honeysuckle Creek websites saying that
Robert Taylor was in charge of “NASA operations” at Parkes during the Apollo 11 mission, but
that does not imply that NASA employees were in control of ALL operations at Parkes
at that time.
And, while he can point to a statement that Parkes was supported by Tidbinbilla staff
during subsequent Apollo missions (but not including Apollo 13), he failed to notice
that that support staff was composed of CSIRO employees who were working on contract for NASA.
Jarrah: Not only was Parkes part of the NASA Manned Spaceflight Network, NASA's Robert
Taylor was in charge of the operations during the Apollo days and controlled all the data
that Parkes relayed to the network.
Webb completely ignored this in his critique.
Hard to imagine why.
Having personally worked as a regular salaried employee, a contract employee, and as a consultant,
I can assure you that these three forms of “employment” are not even remotely the
same thing.
Since Jarrah and I can sit here all day and rattle off all sorts of statements found on
these websites that the other fails to acknowledge, I suggest that you go to the Parkes and Honeysuckle
Creek websites and read for yourself.
Links to these websites are in the description to this video, as well as my previous videos.
Please, read the story of Parkes’ involvement in the Apollo mission and judge for yourself
what the true story is - which statements are consistent with that story and which statements
are being taken out of context to support a dubious claim.
Read, think, use your own power of reasoning and the truth will be obvious.
Jarrah: So, if there was only one radio telescope in the world receiving these videos, then
how could one verify whether the moon walk videos were actually coming from space or
from pre-filmed tapes that the Parkes Observatory was relaying to the world?
As for the TETR-A claim, I went back and looked and nowhere in my TETR-A video did I say that
Jarrah supported Sibrel’s claim.
By the time I got around to making that video and thought that I understood Jarrah’s position,
I finally concluded that Jarrah was simply quote-mining statements made by Windley and
Braenig.
I did discuss Sibrel’s claim thoroughly because it parroted an earlier claim made
by Kaysing that satellites were used to fool amateur radio operators - a claim that Jarrah
does indorse.
But, as Jarrah was quick to point out, I did make a mistake on my first run through and
misrepresented HIS CLAIM in my list of “Jarrah’s thirty-two claims.”
Somehow, I got the impression that Jarrah was talking about TETR-A before I published
the introductory video to my critique.
Now that I finally understand what he was talking about, I admit this was an error on
my part and I have since gone back and annotated all my videos where I show his list of claims
and corrected them, so that they now say Jarrah claimed that “MCC was fooled by simulated
data.”
By the way, since I’m avoiding sarcasm in this video, it’s killing me not to say something
about my inability to figure out what Jarrah actually claimed in my first pass through
his video as being the ONLY mistake that Jarrah has actually been able to catch me make.
Yeah.
It’s killing me.
And, finally, as for the observation I made on the Frank Byrne interview, it seems that
Jarrah himself has done a magnificent job of “back tracking” or “saving face”
by suggesting that it was Ranen’s prerogative to use either the shotgun mic on his camera
or the lav-mic pinned to Frank’s chest.
I think the fact that Ranen pinned lav-mic’s to more than 15 victims, including Frank,
and used them on the others, AND the fact that the sound level didn’t change while
the camera was moving, but only after it arrived at the end of its travel, goes a long way
to indicating whether Frank’s lav-mic was being used or not.
Frank: This is one of the antennas that we received telemetry data from spacecraft.
You decide.
Oh?
And what would Frank have said besides, “We received telemetry data from the moon?”
Well?
How about, “We received voice, TV AND telemetry data,” which they separated and sent the
data portion to MCC.
Again, this observation about Ranen’s video doesn’t have anything to do with any of
Jarrah’s claims.
[Sigh!]
Avoiding sarcasm is killing me.
That’s it - my last word on these subjects.
Jarrah can come back with whatever response he deems necessary to further save face.
I’m moving on.
Ciao moon hoax conspirators, wherever you are.