Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
Healthy is happy
and healthy works better than broken.
When one unites these two truths
with a holistic view, one notices that a healthy world is a happy world
and that it works better than any broken world.
That means: better than any other kind of world
because if one looks at this in the light of the evolution
any other option has lost to it in competition
and is so broken compared to it
in one sense or in another.
The thing that ususally puzzles people in this
is the role of the artificialities:
Have they changed things in any way?!
But the human nature has stayed the same.
Likewise the nature of all living beings has stayed the same.
So what comes to our priciples of functioning
the nature has not changed at all
and humans have not changed at all.
On the other hand,
the artificialities are a new strategy
in the evolution's competition.
With it, like with any new strategy,
it is true that one ought to use it
to benefit from it fully
as far as it brings competition advantage.
But that does not mean that the old strategies,
like eyes, feelings, social feelings, the body and practical life,
would have lost their usefulness in any way.
Neither has our relationship to the nature
lost its usefulness in any way.
These things have just been forgotten
while living too much in the middle of the man-made artificialities,
while we have been counting on this new competition strategy.
But with this it is the same as
With a new bigger pair of teeth:
As the time passes, the changes are
that you hurt yourself.
If you forget all the other sides of life,
you eat away the base for your own functioning.
The strategy which makes most sense, is
to develop technology, and
at the same time keep these old good sides.
The new strategy together with the old winning strategies
is the best, victorious arrangement.
For this reason, in the modern competition
you ought to do well, if you had
healthy ways of living, a healthy relationship to the nature
and life according to feelings.
Feelings come to the picture via the following:
Feelings guide us toward happiness.
We reach happiness when our instinct nature is satisfied.
In other words when we have, in the light of the evolution,
ideal environmental conditions and an ideal way of living.
In other words, the best possible fitness for the task of survival.
So feelings guide us toward happiness
and away from catastrophes,
which is exactly the direction of best survival ability.
This way life according to feelings
is the most beneficial choice that you can make.
On the other hand,
think of this paradise thought the following way:
If the healthy world would be anything but a paradise
our feelings, our instinct nature
would force us to change toward the supposed better.
According to the theory of evolution
such makes no sense:
since the healthy world is the very best option
it makes no sense to giver it up.
But all this has quite a cynical view to what is "healthy",
because our future needs to be on a strong ground.
And if it then turns out that we do better
with the technology than without it,
then we need to develop technology too.
So we need the paradise on Earth of a healthy world
PLUS the technology.
That is the most victorious strategy.
If one then thinks of, which are the demands
that the technology sets on humans,
it sets work efficiency demands.
You ought to be clever and to endure your work,
in other words, be motivated and intellectually fit.
Humans are complex interconnected wholes
who are intellectually most fit when they
are in a good shape in many ways,
live a healthy kind of life in every respect.
And motivation is good when the future seems promising:
everything in ways that suit the human nature.
So the demands that the technology sets on humans
are the same as the demands that the natural evolution
did set on humans.
It is the quaranteeing of the future survival
via the goals of
a healthy world and
healthy natural ways of living.
One part of this is of course moral
and life according to feelings.
Here you must be very strict
on what "the health of the world" means:
It means the health of everything
and it means dropping all poorly working things away.
That is why suffering exists:
in order to force the living beings
away from poor strategies of life
toward good strategies which make us happy
since they have been so good choices during the evolution.
This is why we have feelings:
To guide us toward good strategies of life.
It is the same reason for instincts.
Understanding just forms a picture of the world.
It does not in itself guide us to anything.
If we had no goals what-so-ever,
we would disappear in a short while.
But you get goals via that
if you have no goals, you drop away from the evolution's competition,
and if you have at least some goals,
that gives you the extra goal of survival
in order to be able to reach for those goals in the future too.
So these things are tied together,
so that you cannot very well discern
between the goal of survival
and the goals if fitness in every task.
So survival is our common goal.
That is given by the healthy world,
by its paradise on Earth.
But what is it in fact
that is healthy?
Safeguarding good health is healthy.
In other words good moral is healthy.
In a competition it is not healthy
to be short-sighted and
to watch only from one point of view.
There is a need for variation,
for many strategies which allow
that one can via a procedure
like the natural selection,
and via learning,
quickly adabt to changing circumstancies.
This is why it is good in the human societies,
if there are people with very different strengths,
ones with different charactersm people of different types
with different directions in life.
From among them one can find those who
know how to adabt to each kind of situation.
It is of course the same with the variation
of different species of animals
and other forms of life.
Good type of competition does not drop these things away.
In the human nature there is also
a respect for justice
which is very important
in order to get the best arrabgements.
Moral means that we
first follow justice,
carry responsibility and look from the point of view of the whole.
That the human pack works well together.
In other words, that you are honest enough,
in all important matters.
Human values are also important but
they are secondary compared to justice.
So, on these grounds
it is possible starting from many different points of view
to arrive always at the healthy world
as the best possible option.
In this video
there are 28 points of view
which end up supporting the healthy world
as the very best option.
So in practice almost all points of view
lead to the same conclusion
of the healthy world being the very best option.
Thank you and bye!