Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
Dracula, a la Shmoop. Dracula…the originator of the vampire myth
in literature.
This guy didn’t sit around brooding in a black trench coat or sparkling in the sun.
Dracula is not a guy you’d play basketball with…
…or invite to prom, and not just because he’s a few hundred years old and the age
difference would be creepy.
He lurks in the shadows, kills people and drinks their blood.
But is he a total Big Bad, or can we scrounge up a little bit of sympathy for the batty
old coot? For one thing, we don't actually know much
about the guy.
He’s usually up in his castle, hanging out with his vampire brides.
He’s not exactly one for socialization, and we don’t get a huge long back story,
either.
It's a little hard to sympathize with a guy you don't know, and the mystery around him
makes him seem like nothing but a villain.
Plus, a vampire polygamist living in a creepy castle doesn’t exactly scream… good guy.
And yet, he does tell us… I too can love; you yourselves can tell it from the past.
Aww, how sweet.
But what past? It's possible that Dracula has loved and lost in his past… and that's
why he's so damaged and deranged in the present.
Hmm, perhaps a tragic love affair with one… or all… of his vampire wives.
Stoker isn’t giving us any more details. No matter what happened to the Count, when
we think of him this way, we can almost sorta kinda relate to him.
At least, to the loving and losing part.
Not so much the bloodsucking and fond attachment to Middle Age torture devices.
Maybe the fact that there's so much mystery surrounding his story actually could evoke
sympathy.
Or at least curiosity.
After all, how can we judge someone we don't really know?
We wouldn’t judge a book by its cover, so why should we judge a bat by its… fangs?
Without a thorough back story, we can hardly get to know him.
But he does speak of love and loss, which might almost make you shed a tear.
So is Dracula 100 percent bad?
Or is it okay to feel a little sorry for the bloodsucker?
Shmoop amongst yourselves.