Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
Hello everyone this is Uncle Yap, this is Mr. KK Chia.
In my previous interview, I spoke to Mr, Chia & his mom Madam So.
They suffered a series of injustice cases here.
A civil suit is in the Singapore's Supreme Court involving all of Madam So's funds to support her old age.
Mandarin will be used for today's interview with Mr. KK Chia
Hi Mr. Chia!
Hi Mr. Yap!
You told us in previous interview that costs were not awarded during trials at court, but later CHANGED by court to become AWARDED after trial.
They will not give you the transcripts that will prove the trial itself, right till today, is that right?
Indeed! We have repeatedly in 4 times applied for transcripts but had only been denied.
Was any excuses offered for the delays and refusals?
Actually when I sorted the transcripts right after the 127/2007 case, to file a Law Society Complain.
The Digital Transcripts Service's manager had initially agreed to provide. However, just few days before collection appointment, she informed me that the Judge had changed the decision about it.
Negated your transcripts! Ha! Ha!
Further they said unless the Law Society had form Committee of Inquiry, the transcripts wouldn't be provided.
In my Law Soc complain case it got only as far as the Preliminary Inquiry stage, after which no further inquiry took place. It halted after finding no action to take against my lawyer.
To make it right about transcripts here, it should have absolutely nothing to do with any Law Society Inquiry on lawyers fault at all.
Even for a trial in which all sides have no issues left after that, transcripts of this trial will remains as permanent public records. This is regardless of weather there is any doubt with any party regarding the trial that took place.
The transcripts remains available at any time to any one. A law student for example can obtain it as learning material.
Journalists can obtain transcripts as material for writing. Such reasons or excuses about Law Society's Inquiry is totally irrelevant, to deny your rightful access to transcripts.
They can not hide away transcripts. Not for the Open Court Trials. These are Public Records. Public properties. Not family secrets nor state secrets nor military secrets.
For Open Court Trials they are Public Domain's Records. Publics have rights of access and to know about what happened in trials.
Not something they had sweep under carpet, lock in closet, or buried or burnt away. If they did then there IS GREATLY FISHY smells!
This is a keynote that I wish to highlight.
Lets proceed with Mr. Chia on other unjust aspects arises in his cases..
I like to point out first that court are imperfect practically, not divine as officers are humans. They can be deceived; lied to; tricked; mistaken etc at trials.
But they have to be transparent; responsible; honest about any mistakes of their own. Any discovered miscarriage of justice they must do corrections.
I do believe that Mr. Chia you do know about a recent case of Miscarriage Of Justice in Taiwan ROC, that received Redress and Justice.
In this case Court Martial convicted a soldier and had already executed him more than 10 years ago.
Wrongful Conviction for ***-*** of 5 years old girl after an unjust trial. The killer was actually another soldier, but court believed that the accused was responsible, so convicted and executed him. And over turned the case after more than 10 years.
The soldier's parents had been trying all these while to vindicate their executed son, and by now the father had already died awaiting for justice.
Although the dead can not be brought back alive, but Justice is Never Too Late.
As long was we know that judgment was wrong, and injustice was done, then correction mustn't be spared.
Admission of judicial mistakes is necessary, we are only doing even more wrongs by covering up or denying Miscarriage of Justice.
It is totally unacceptable for a court to do such denial and cover up.
Let Mr. Chia now tell us about his cases, from 558/2005 to 127/2007 and so on..
Was it One Mistake After Another?
That's right! According to findings of Law Society, my 1st lawyer sued wrong party and too wrong perspective, that was why I lost my 1st case.
In 127/2007 my later lawyer had also similarly followed the mistake, as they believed that appeals must in general follow the thread of the original case. Then they suggested that I file my complain to Law Society.
There isn't any useful outcome from that complain, after wasting 18 months with that.
After Law Society's Inquiry had stopped, the opponent's lawyer Wong S P began taxation cases (189 & 190 for 558/2005 & 127/2007) in which I was UN-represented by any lawyer.
Because lawyer Barnard & Rardar..
Pse skipping some frivolous details and go straight to tell what went WRONG with cases, as my question had directed you.
OK. Their lawyer S P Wong demanded S$1.22 million in taxation as mentioned in our previous interview. When the sum became so big, I and my mother could not handle, so we looked for lawyer's help again.
At that time I encounter Mr. Ng Teck Siong who was a member of the Reform Party.
Reform Party – RP yes.
RP yes.
He was indeed the RP's Chairman at that time.
Yes indeed Chairman. And that Secretary General of RP then was late Mr. JBJ.
I had arranged with Mr. Ng TS to meet with Mr. JBJ, but unfortunately he suddenly died just 2 days before our meeting appointment.
Mr. Ng Teck Siong then suggested that I go to Speakers Corner with the hope to find another lawyer with courage and honor to help me find justice.
Thereafter in January & February last year, I had staged a series of Demonstrations at Speakers Corner.
There I found Mr. Chia Ti Lik a lawyer from Chia Ngee Thuang & Co.
After Mr. Chia studied my cases, he gathered the Mistaken Facts and Evidence and wrote a letter to the judge who heard the earlier case 558/2005.
Trial Judge of the case?
Right Trial Judge. Wishing that judge would..
Who was that judge?
Justice Lai Siew Choo that was. We hoped that she would re-open the case based on the Miscarriage Of Justice discovered.
After writing that, the Registrar replied in a very simple letter to state that the case had been decided by The Court Of Appeal, which is Final in judiciary chain. Therefore there is NOTHING They Can Do About the case.
This is very ridiculous in principle, I must strongly point out today. When a court discovered that Miscarriage Of Justice was done by mistake. All they can tell you was that since it had been done by Final Court Of Appeal, there is absolutely nothing they could do about it.
That means only that they want to preserve the mistake and further the mistake. This is very serious for the role of judiciary court, Witness can lie on oath; fabricate evidence; mislead the court; leading to Miscarriage Of Justice.
In the case that I brought up here, a man had been executed wrongfully, within a Miscarriage Of Justice. It may take a long time, but finally justice and truth are found.
How can court deny people justice and shut their door, telling us that was final, and we bear with it? Because they are the Highest Authority?
Officers of Justice be Afraid to point out to higher authority at their mistakes? This isn't acceptable!
Officers of Justice must be Fearless of Status & Ranks. You will punish / execute Royal Princes if that is to be lawful and right.
You have to deliver the justice to the people you are serving.
I am aware that our current Chief Justice had mentioned not long ago, that any cases can be reopened at any stage as long as there is relevant New Evidence discovered. That should be the correct way of justice.
To serve justice correctly, regardless of the stage of trial, weather or not it reached Final Court Of Appeal, as long as discovered evidence proved Miscarriage Of Justice, the correction MUST be done. For example the Real Killer was just caught.
Can you deny justice for the sake of FACE? Authoritarian Ego? Falsify your own PERFECTION? Further the wrongs? Further Betray Justice?
Your banner used for previous interview indicated a Repetition of Injustice, this depicts what happened in reality isn't it Mr. Chia?
Indeed.
Officers of Justice are human subjected to deceptions, misleads, mistakes. Evil parties and witnesses can lie on witness stand. Leading to wrong judgments. These are nothing UN-usual in court.
However, officers of justice, when they learned about such injustice done, can not save their own Faces, Reputations, Authority Figures, by denying own faults done.
The more Respectable Officers and Courts of Justice, are actually those who admitted their wrong judgments, and Corrected them. And they are Only More Respected by people when they do so.
When people found out that Courts & Judges deepen injustice oppressing their own victims of injustice, to shut them up. Then their respect can be Completely Lost for such Courts & Officers.
So Mr. Chia in your cases were that any witnesses who provided false evidence?
Yes.
Misleading court by false evidence while on oath?
You discovered via the In Chamber Records that your opponent's lawyer deceived the court by fabricating lies in chamber?
Yes.
Deceiving court for the purpose of obtaining a favorable judgment?
Yes.
You brought up all these to the court?
After writing to court about it, in my Originating Summon 331 case, these were brought to court's attention.
Lawyer Mr. Chia Ti Lik fought for a Re-Trial on this basis.
Please tell us more about OS 331 case. It was an appeal? 3 presiding judges? Correct? How long was trial?
It's original schedule was set to be only 30 mins. However it actually took whole 2 hours at court.
But so strangely most of the time spent were not for hearing My Case, but instead, the court trial the lawyer who represented me! Mr. Chia Ti Lik!
Please tell us what actually took place at trial.
When we filed OS331 into court, they seemed to be very concerned initially.
By this you meant at the time before the trial began?
Yes before trial. The court promptly asked for more amount of copies of documents than usually and previously. We felt that they were seriously looking at the case, and we cooperated gladly.
On the day of the trial itself however, Mr. Chia Ti Lik had only 15 mins to make submission for our case.
Only 15 mins? But your case was 2 and half hours right?
It was 2 hours.
In the 2 hours, only 15 mins was for hearing of your case?
Yes indeed. He brought up a Malaysian case of authority / precedence.
Who brought up this precedence?
My council Mr. Chia Ti Lik.
Oh Mr. Chia!
That was business case in Malayian Court, and a company won an appeal via dirty frauds in the matter, judgment was overruled later, because it was found that fraud caused the wrong judgment.
Court found itself misled by a party via fraud to pass a wrongful judgment? Correct?
Yes cheated the judge, to obtain a favorable judgment. So Court Of Appeal overruled the previous judgment and granted Re-Trail for that case.
Was the overruling against a judgment from The Final Court Of Appeal?
They overruled the judgment from The Final Court Of Appeal.
Further different from Malaysia & Singapore, the Chinese courts in PRC & ROC Taiwan, they can have many retries. And there are plenty cases that went through many repeated appeals spanned over 20-30 years.
What I do know is Commonwealth court cases can be used in all courts of Commonwealth Nations like Malaysia & Singapore, interchangeably.
Yes, the Commonwealth court cases.
However, one of the 3 judges on that trial, pointed out that Mr. Chia Ti Lik had used only a Malaysian case as precedence, he demanded Mr. Chia to provide a Singaporean case of precedence. He insisted that a Singaporean precedence does not exist as such.
What he said was that Singapore totally lacks such precedence?
Yes he said such precedence do not exist in Singapore, to over turn any judgment from Court Of Appeal, and grant re-trial.
Is that what a Court of Appeal Judge said? That Singaporean Court of Appeal would NEVER over-turn any of their own judgments regardlessly?
That is what I understand by hearing from him.
His position was so, even though it was shown that previous judgment was caused by court that had been misled? No re-trial still?
That's right.
You had been told like this by a Court Of Appeal Judge that was their position?
Yes, one of the three judges there, said that.
But your lawyer insisted against that?
My lawyer submitted that his Malaysian case of authority is applicable here even in Singapore.
He brought up his view different from that of the judge. Unfortunately then this judge began to put my lawyer on trial.
This judge then began to pick on your lawyer you mean?
Yes he pick on my lawyer. He accused Mr Chia that his “Behavior was unbecoming of lawyer”.
What did he do? Showed bad attitude in court?
From my own perspective I felt that he was conducting himself too softly that day instead!
He threw the documents?
Nope!
He *** the desk?
Nope!
Shouted?
Nope!
Kicked the furniture? Nope!
Pointed at the judges and scolded them? Nope!
None of all that!
What was he doing there that was “unbecoming of lawyer”
Until that moment all his conduct were seen by me to be respectful of the court.
Then you mean that he got 2 hours of picking by judge?
Yes throughout all the remaining time left in that 2 hours of trial! He was on trial!
That means you as the plaintiff of that case, your matters only received 15 mins of the court's attention, and the rest of your time was wasted by the court picking against just your lawyer?
Indeed!
And by that, you had received even more injustice?
Indeed! Near the end of it, I put up my hand as plaintiff, and wanted to address the court. But they had disallowed me, citing that I had engaged a lawyer.
And with that note, they had again dismissed my appeal.
They dismissed your appeal and want to hear no more of it?
Indeed.
That was all of it? Your case?
I must state very clearly here, that there was NO COST AWARDED, until then.
That means court Had Not Order you to pay Lawyer’s Fee to S P Wong?
Did not ordered.
And then the court just stood down?
The court stood down then.
But S P Wong later demanded cost?
That’s right they did.
Amount of S$1.22 million?
No! That S$1.22 million was for 558/2005 & 127/2007.
I see!
For this OS331 he demanded dozens of thousands, I can not remember the precise figure right now.
I feel here that this is rather unacceptable. When judge discovered evidence of Fraud Of Justice in a case, done by someone dishonestly, and false evidence misled a previous judgment to be done wrongly.
Judge ought to have this initiative to correct for justice, weather there is precedence for such correction. Have the initiative to set this precedence of correction. This example is one that not only lack initiative, but the rather seeked excues to dodge the necessary correction.
Further, when the lawyer representing the victim had insisted for the necessary correction, the judge abused his power and status to pick on this lawyer? Is this intention to hide the shameful mistake made previously?
Are they trying to prevent a scandal of Miscarriage Of Justice to be dug out to the surface? Do you think it is so?
Objectively I don’t view it that way, and that is why I had not given up. I am still persuing it with new case S97/2011
In which the exact same facts as with OS331 were in the new case. But I am very precise this time.
Pointing out exactly where and what were the frauds and lies, and how they caused the previous judgments to be made wrongly.
So far this caused my opponent to be unable to answer to my accusations against them. If I still get justice this time then I would think that there is a bigger problem exposed.
In my view problems aren’t small at all as they are so far. I remember you mentioned that police officers / bailief were stopping you in the court, when you were tring to address the court? Was that in the OS331 case?
Well that was when one of the..
Are we now talking about OS331? Correct?
OS331 yes.
One of the 3 justices, out of the blue, told me that he had heard from somewhere about my bad tempers.
Oh? Were you agitated or frastrated at the court then?
I did not! I was very well abided by court’s rules. Like any orderly party in court, I raised my hand and asked for permission to address the court. If this fits being Bad Tempered, then I no longer know what is the right conduct in court!
Had that judge heard any of your cases before that?
None except of my 127/2007 appeal, in which I had remainded silent within that.
From where and from what basis could that judge be accusing you of being bad tempered?
I wished I had that chance to ask him about this, but I had not got such as chance.
So that’s how he had ordered a bailief / policeman to stand behind you?
Judge did not ordered. But the policeman approached me and came right next to me as the judge said that.
What did the policeman do then?
Well, he used his hand signals to stop speaking.
Prevented you from addressing the court?
That’s right.
Actually, as the plaintiff or appeallent in an appeal, weather or not one engaged any lawyers, one can address the court directly when it becomes nenessary.
You may make application to temporarily dispense with your council in a court, if you need that.
Let me give you SDP’s Dr. Chee Soon Juan’s example, in a case which he was also represented by the same lawyer Mr. Chia Ti Lik.
But he arranged that council Chia Ti Lik was only instructed to handle a very specific area of law on Dr. Chee’s behalf, and then Dr. Chee directly handle his own case in all other aspects.
In this example both the appeallent and his lawyer were directly addressing the court, in the trial.
Thus they had mishandled your rights as the appeallent, to deny your rights to directly address the court. I am able to tell you this.
This already happened twice, in 127/2007 and OS331 respectively.
Wow! Twice? No chance to address the court when you felt as necessary?
No chance to do so.
Then case got stood down? Yes! Then you were made to pay cost?
After the case.
That is some discrapancies here. These are not right at all.
Courts should be the one insisting for justice to be served, even when the victims already got sick and tired of litigations, and wants to rest the matters. Court should order to get to the bottom of matters.
Even if the lawyer isn’t going to act for the victim, the court should provide the victim with a council to proceed to the bottom to get justice served. This should be their duties.
The rather that, court prevents victims to further pursue for justice, court shouldn’t save their own dignity by oppressing justice seeking victims, abusing powers, to shut victims up, to burry scandals, it is great disgrace if a court did such a thing.
I had not been to any of your trials however, and I am not able to be so sure. I can however appreciate what you said, because I spents years with Singaporean courts. I heard and seen things myself too.
So your lawyer Mr. Chia Ti Lik, was complaint to Law Society and made to pay fine for that? Did he?
He was indeed being complained to Law Soc and made to pay fine. But I don’t think that was dicrectly related to the OS331 matter in which he represented me.
Oh! That wasn’t for OS331.
These things had already happened, and I hope court pay attention to them after the matters were bought up here. To correct and prevent them.
Next Mr. Chia, can you tell us how the council and witnesses of your opponent, did somethings dirty behind your back, lied to court and misled court, can you tell us?
I need to clarify that that was not really done behind my back, their distorted facts in defend and counter claims etc, were discovered and pointed out by my lawyer since 558/2005, however they just dodged to answer and straighten them, and further continued to exploit these faults and lies down the road within the case, until the judgment had worked out in their favor as a result.
I meant what you mentioned in the previous interview that, you had later discovered lies and faruds, that you were not originally aware as they were made, that you found out via In Chamber Records when you doubted.
Do you mean dividing a case into 3 cases, and the cost had thus been inflated by 3 times as a result? Due to an order of a judge?
Oh right!
You were kept in the dark initially?
Yes and that was in the taxation case . Because S P Wong demanded for S$1.22 million as cost. He claimed that during appeal a judge had instructed him to divide 1 case into 3 cases, so he had thus demanded cost for 3 cases, costing total of S$1.22 million. That was a taxation case.
That justification he offered.
An excuse?
This judge order was discovered to be a mere fabrication? You managed to prove?
His excuse yes. In taxation.
Indeed! When that was given to me, I had demanded him to show me prove that a judge had made such order to divide the case.
His reply to me was that I had taken the wrong view, but in the taxation he had so clearly divided the case into 3 cases.
I was insatisfied with his answers, so I went to the registrar to verify the In Chamber Hearing Recorded.
(translated) Verified In Chamber Hearing Records with the registrar?
That’s right. As I was disallowed to photocopy these records, I had hand-copied them, and submitted them right in the current case.
That had provened that S P Wong had lied about it. The judge did not issue any such order In Chamber then! And not only that, but during then he had fabricated a load of other lies to the judge then. Tricked the judge then, and led to his success in appeal, to continue his case further, which otherwise, his case had already been struck off by our 2nd strike off application.
This sounds very serious to me! Because a lawyer had manipulated with justice via lie to judge and misleading the court! He fabricated a non-existence order of a judge to deceive another judge! This fraud is manupulating justice by fabricating a non-existence order of judge!
This is as serious as impersonating a judge to give this order! Because his issued this order himself when the judge did not, and he fabricated this order himself, assuming the power of a judge!
This is a very serious kind of fraud! If the court is still not interested in this, not penalizing the culprit who did this, and not reacting to this. Then how could we believe that court is respecting it’t own integrity? Or dignity Or image? How can we trust that?
This would be a big misfit! How could a court accept that it’s authority and power be abused and manipulated by this kind of fraud? Fabricated a non-exsistence order of judge! How can that be telerated and be acceptable? Misleading one judge by assuming another? And get away with that?
I am totally not able to accept this!
I hope it wouldn’t be this way. I have presented this evidence so clearly to the court, and this won’t that them any big efforts to understand what I had shown to them.
You provided clear-cut evidence for this?
Yes!
Brought up within your currently on going case? Right?
Yes that’s right.
Then I hope the court really that this very seriously this time. Admit and ractify the faults and frauds committed by the culprit. The criminal liability of this culprit must not be let off unpunished! When the evidience against culprit of such act is so clear cut, and if this could still be ignored by judges, then what kind of court have we got? That is what I really need to say.
Mr. Chia, is that anything else that you need to fill us in now?
I really hope that this round the courts will really return us justice, sort out this case and do what is right and just about it. I wouldn’t rest the matter if it is still wrongly treated.
Deliver the lacked justice to you and your mom right? You are not really clearing your name because they had not convicted you wrongfully nor had you been charged, is this correct? The injustice only made you suffer badly in a civil suit, and it isn’t a criminal charge against you.
Not quite! They had initially falsely accusing me of fraud! That is when I am their victim!
The other side accused you of fraud initially?
Right!
What wonderful places to turn table around, that the courts are! This sum is what your parants are counting on to cover their old ages and medical fees, isn’t it?
My parents Cofin Capitals so to speak. And my part is also my own hard earned money which I worked many years to save up. These monies are so vital to my family.
It the previous interview, it seemed so confusing, by your mother’s presentation, she put it as her S$100K was mistaken to be S$200K. May confused some viewers, can you share some lights to clarify? What were your losses?
OK, my mom invested S$100K into this project. This is really her own money which is proven by 2 casher orders and her own bank account passbook statements. I invested my own S$326,467 totally.
Your investment and your moms were done seperatedly instead of jointly.?
Right! In my portion, there is S$100K which came from a loan of this amount from my business partner at that time, and I had returned that amount to her after that.
This part of S$100K is precisely where it had gotten wrong, the sum that I had returned to her. Because she need to cover up the fact that my capital investment got ommited out from the company’s capitalization. She created confusion regarding this S$100K, to claim that this S$100K was sum that I had entrusted under my mom’s share capcity.
Now they claimed that my missing capitals had been entrusted under my mother’s name. But this is a lie! These sums does not add up at all! Their wrong figures makes no sense! I had provided evidence on this since day one.
In summery, that is your injected capital of S$300+K vannished in capitalization, and then a S$100K portion of the missing amount is claimed to had been placed under the trust of your mother’s share holdings. This is where the contention exist is that correct?
That is cleared now. Is there anything else to be clarified further?
It is better that I present detailed evidence in our next interview, then things will become crystal clear to everyone.
It is true. But probrably the audience does not need to be bothered with overly detailed evidences, I just need you to tell what injustice happened to you with brief facts. That suffices. Leave the details as evidence in your case, let courts study the details, since your had included them within your case.
Let judges sort out what went wrong in your case, with your evidence. For now, we had already pointed out in brief what and how things had gone wrong in your cases.
I like to mention now, that your mom is the most senior citizen in my own knowledge who had taken part in demonstration at Speakers’ Corner of Hong Lim Park. So far she is the eldest Singaporean within my own knowlege who had protested there.
My mother is already 80 years old, and she came to Hong Lim Park Speakers Coner to demonstrate with me in some occassions.
Yes that was what I got. Was the court presented by someone, with the photographs of your demonstration seeking justice, using these banners, at Hong Lim Speaker Corner?
That’s right? It was my opponent’s council Mr. S P Wong! He download these and printed them out and submitted them to the court.
Why? Is he assiting you to seek justice? Or what?
Nope! He was just showing to the court of my defiance against the findings by court, to impress court that I am unreasonable.
I think he is exploiting these photos in such an angle: that he is of the view that if aggrieved persons went to Hong Lim Park’s Speakers Corner, to voice out against injustice they suffered, then the court would take offense against these protesters, that they had violated the reputation and authority of the courts!
I think he was expecting the court to be defending it’s own fame and image, to take stands against those who had protested about their grievences. He hope these photos could be exploited towards his interest, by annoying the court. To cause more unfavarable rulings against you!
If such a logic was workable, then this lawyer’s mindset would be one that expect the court to abuse it’s power to protest it’s public image and worthiness. Weather be truthful or vain fames. He was expecting the court to oppress against you as a protester.
I now present a totally negating logic against that, a court will only be more respected by the public when it would be truly transparent, responsible, and humbly admits any faults, and rectify them accordingly. If courts would abuse it’s power to oppress protesting aggrieved persons, to silent them in order to defend court’s reputation, preventing unjust truths to be exposed, then they are just truely unworthy courts!
These are then not the court that serves judiciary purposes for justices.
Your cases, are still within the hands of the courts, and they have still got chances to uphold justices for you. Never too late for cases like this, in comparison of the earlier examples I shown.
In which the innocent had been convicted and executed wrongfully. They are still redressing dead man. They should restore justice for the dead. Clear their names. Not neglect them just because justice would be considered as late.
Only with courage to admit and rectify faults would make court respected by the public. If the courts only defend temporary fames and false reputations, and force the aggrieved to pay the price for courts’ pride, tell procedural excuses such as Final Court Of Appeal decision can not be reversed, who would give any respect to such court?
Would that also be your position?
My hope is that the truth will finally prevail.
I am very sure that many aggrieved persons in Singapore wouldn’t be as persistent as Mr. Chia here. They gave up after suffering setbacks with seeking justice, they are not willing to spend more efforts, time, and money into that. They just swallow their pains snd grievences after their disappointments with justice in Singapore.
I have knowlege of many similar cases, take for example my late old friend Mr. JBJ. He was The Registrar Of Supereme Court, he was District Judge, he was a very profoundly experienced practicing lawyer, he was an elected law maker in the legislative parliament.
This allowed the famiLEE LEEgime to continue their own far-fetched falsehood bragging about a PERFECT JUSTICE facade to the whole world. To claim that they are the most Advance, most Fair, most Equal, most Nobel system of justice in the world. This is most ironical!
Frankly speaking, I am some how one such person, that I have many of my own cases in Singapore’s courts, suffering injustices in a larger number of cases compared against Mr. Chia here! But I did not want to say so much about my own grivences! Instead, I had put lights on aggrieved persons such as Mr. Chia here!
His son Philip had been president of Law Society of Singapore for years, and as profound and professional as well as respected widely within the domain of law in Singapore, as late Mr. JBJ, the Privy Council had in it’s own judgment stated that he had been aggrieved by a great deal of injustice under the hands of Singapore’s Judiciary.
What are the truthful prospect of perfect justice for common persons like Mr. KK Chia & myself and other similar citizens of Singapore? When such a law capable person in the capacity of JBJ is aggrieved? What is the reality in truth? I wasn’t telling my opinion only, I was quoting the judgment from Privy Council.
There is surely a lot of rooms for improvements and reform. Let me put it that way. Don’t be drunk with false fames about being a perfect justice system. Be realistic. Don’t live in that mirrage. Dig out the problems and dirts and clean them up, and that is the way to earn real respect from the world. That’s is my sincere opinion.
So with Mr. Chia, I would like to arrange another interview with you, hopefully inviting your mom here again to speak with me.
Very well.
We try to arrange an interview next week. Is that fine with you?
Very well.
Thank you Mr. Chia!
On behalf of my mother & for myself I would like to express our appreciation to you Mr. Yap for offering us opportunity here to air our grivences. Thank you!
It is because that our Singaporean Main Stream Media are unwilling to air your griefs. They fear of offending the courts. I believe that you had approached the MSM regarding this? You tried that? Right?
Not just the MSM, even the lawyers are so!
Even so are the lawyers you found huh? When you are willing to pay them for representing you in your cases, they declined you fearing to offend the courts, is that correct?
You had approached MSM and lawyers, and encounted resistence, like you said?
Well! That is additional lights into the dark reality of Singapore’s Perfect System of Justice!
I am very willing to put lights into this darkness, come to me with cases of injustices and grivences, I accept your cases as long as you speak only the truth. I would be able to record video interview for Internet, such as this one, with you.
I can provide you a chance to air your own voices and grivences, to the world via Internet. Your cases that MSM wouldn’t report, your cases that even transcripts in your trial had been burried away in the courts. You can tell the world! You have this chance here! Contact me!
Aggrieved and would tell only the truth, you are welcome to my interviews. If you are not willing to expose your faces, I can arrange that you be interviewed behind a screen or wearing masks. No problem! To contact me my email address is on the screen at the end of this video.
Thanks everyone! Thanks Mr. Chia!
Thanks!