Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
and their michael bloomberg so did that has been rejected by a state supreme
court jagjit at the judge milton tingling at basically says that the law
is archer
it could be picked up by my point whether the river playing it
canister and felt that if there's any
singling busier anyway
cover clouds and hit anyway now as i mentioned adherence acted at that does
the soda band of unit sixteen ounces or more
recycle receipts to no sense
i because of the fact that he considers it arbitrary and he also thinks that
this is basically ab mere bloomberg overstepping the boundaries because this
is something that the city council should have voted on
however uh... and their bloomberg appointed panel of health professionals
or a board of health professionals actually voted on this
so uh... i seven issue with that
and another thing yet problem with was the loopholes now when it comes to
chains like seven eleven or other art you know fast food restaurants
uh... those restaurants and those stores are regulated by the state
however uh... since this is something that would happy in manhattan in new
york city uh... the only people that would be affected by this are mom and
pop shops that would be a little unfair and as the judge says
the loopholes in this rule
of fact in the defeat the stated purpose of this role
yet is so he actually is a lot of good points
it seems like you've been kind of one on technical grounds
because
but you know it's not so technical and and all of the business owners including
the movie theater chains that
where another silicosis hundreds of thousand dollars
to actually change things
you know for some other stores are many users that are
let alone the fact that you can sell more that's uh...
but why doesn't apply to the other guys
said i know why it's is a state law et cetera but it seems part of the leon
there
but they didn't cite the cases you're saying you know
on whether the band mates answer
because of course a judiciary
shouldn't get involved and that's not their job that's the job of the
legislature in the center branch to workout but they're just saying whether
it's applied evenly and it's not so that it's it's god out of course blumberg
says verified all the way but you know me uh...
finally to the man you're it
ratso
i'm like i think that it's a very simple are simplistic approach to a very
complex issue and to say like hour in a bad so does that are more than sixteen
ounces
if that's not gonna solve obesity is a gay convince some people to consume less
calories sure but that certainly not
uh... the the great solution to a very complex problem in as you mentioned
there blumberg says that he will fight tooth and nail
and he treated about this he says they plan to appeal the cigar sugary drinks
decision as soon as possible and we are confident the measure will alternate
leading upto so will see about that
and looked on the part of it is i just simply have a problem with it
philosophically
i don't mean the over should tell me what it really matter
i don't read anything about sixteen ounces and i agree the issue
bizarrely while the marketing campaign saying hey don't drink that much because
it actually has on apollo weight you not even aware
great usually people know about that without pay
not and i i just think that's personal freedoms i don't agree with that at all
we also say that
tingly sounds like
and uh... you might find it as it was well so justice tingling
head for war
busy train
or whatever you are