Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
this david packard shell had david packard dot com
welcome back to the bill
david packing dot com slash couldn't get to a one-year membership andy david
package of the special off hit the commercial free podcast bones show and
of course the archive of shows dating all the way back to two thousand five
that the dark days
of the david packard show one which one would say zaroor were referring to the
man's type i prefer not to refer to a dark ages story
similar and there's nothing better than violating the law you're looking to
create you probably are aware that yesterday we had a number of blackouts
pro testing soap but and people including wikipedia including reddit
including a number of other websites
and it turns out that a lot of the supporters of these laws that
that summer seeking to create are violators of the laws as well
uh... it turns out we have a couple of images here and this was great research
that has been done if we look at that
uh... senator roy blunt
if you look at the background-image honest twitter page which will put up
here for you do we have it up guys give me a followup from that of the event
uh... this picture if we look at it uh... is a little strange we can
actually see the entire picture which is born to
and the picture is one that was taken by photographer walter roland and uh...
his wife was spoken to you and she told vice dot com
while while i'm so surprised to see that someone would do this especially a
senator it's even more of a violation because i'm actually in the photo so
it's as if i'm supporting his beliefs that's one of my husband's photos who's
a semi professional photographer and no they weren't given permission
road one has since changed the background on his twitter in an attempt
to kind of cover his tracks
same thing the clinic at school another support
the background-image on uh... her twitter account was taken from flickr
user j steven conn
who said i don't recall giving the sender permission to use the photo on
her twitter account
i have put the photo in the creative commons which means it can be used for
non-commercial purposes however proper attribution should be given it is not in
the public domain
it is obvious from stuff like this list
that the people who are trying to put so clinton people forward
are doing it for their own benefit they're not doing it for the people
and also shadowrun or or they have really no concept of what they're about
to do it shows they have absolutely no idea what they're trying to do in the
first place that's exactly a it and it you know we'll see what happens with
this it is a huge huge concern
we can't have these issues going on uh... where we can't
have funny caption to mean pictures floating around because they might
violate copyright
that's a big part of the internet
we need those funny caption pictures
we need a lot of things uh... that this could put in jeopardy
absolutely so we need to continue doing everything we can to make sure that
legislation is blocked