Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
telling us to him and i a m the very very disappointed to say the least in a
lot of people will use their respect for
on the left people who i thought were principal people i thought cared about
principles over politician they cared about policy and substance over people
but a lot of people there just flat out picking president obama over any type of
principle over
uh... ani type of
care for civil liberties of the constitution
i mean the whole he understand the whole idea of me not liking george w_ bush and
attacking george w_ bush
was because i disagree with his policies
ini blatantly destroyed the constitution
so if i hate president almost for president bush for not caring about the
constitution
generated president obama for like a lot of prostitution taking his
but illegal programs and putting them on steroids yet absolutely it's a no
brainer
in my shoe blindly sheerly for the party
i mean your opinion on this should be obvious right
well uh...
another plane you a clip this is president of bomb a
in two thousand eight
let's listen to what he had to say about civil liberties
administration quit or afterwards
between the liberties we cherish
whiskered we provide
i'll provide our intelligence and law enforcement agencies with tools they
need a proactive take out the terrorist without undermining our constitution
evaporate
heavy snow were illegal wiretapping american service
nor national security letters to spy on citizens or not suspected of a crime
or tracking citizens with nothing more of a protest
interest at all
norton or go up what is it convenient
is not we are
was necessary to defeat the terrorists
advisor or works
the separation of powers
our constitution
reward is that an example for the world that the law is not subject to the waves
of stubborn rollers
the justice is not over
where did that guy go
president bomb a today
we can't have one hundred-percent privacy and one hundred-percent security
interesting ben franklin disagrees
quote from ben franklin
huge sacrifices freedom for security
deserves neither
i want our constitutional law pressed professor in two thousand eight he had a
male he was exactly right on everything he said there
couldn't be anymore different i mean
that's the exact polar opposite
so this is my up lead
idiots that media matters who are still defending the administration
horrendous hypocrisy they should be ashamed they should be embarrassed and i
really just give up politics
this field obviously isn't for you
if you can but realize a basic popper see like that when you attacking bush
foreign agar
praising all bomb afford right also add addicting info dot org another website
are usually use when i'm prepared for the show
yeah i'll not i will not be using their website anymore
why because they defend this
uh... they attacked covington posed
accurately reporting the news and saying audio obama's kind of taking the bush
programs and made it worse
harlingen post
used to be a reputable news source all really used to be no you're used to be
and now you're not me more
so dear is my pleaded to these morons tha
hop off your bomb a loyalist bandwagon
look it's very simple
either you agree with two thousand and they told mama
or you agreed with two thousand and thirteen obama
it's not possible to agree with both
literally is allot a single contradiction to agree with both
that's why people use the same the republicans use a well i agree with
george h w much as foreign policy and i agree with george w_ bush is foreign
policy
failure on republicans
that's why
but their foreign policies were completely different one was largely a
non interventionist he was in favor of mostly money our business illinois and
then every country uh... that we can think of george w_ bush was a die-hard
interventionist
you know you might wonder you like any other you can't have it both ways it's
not possible
you know you agree with all our love to doesn't make or you agree with them on
the twenty thirteen
if you agree with both finger contradictory
and a contradictory doesn't make any sense you're now you don't care about
policy substance
value a person overall principal or a policy
and it looked like outlets point on this real fast
the entire point of the constitution is to say
these things are not debatable
these are the certain things that we've laid out there off the table anything
else you can have a democratic discussion about what we can vote on it
and we set a political processes
where in a lot of cases a simple majority of pics which direction we
should take the country x en route
when it comes to things that are unconstitutional
you're not allowed to debate those things or things are off the table
soul regardless of party whether it's a democrat a republican of somebody's
violating something that they're not allowed to violate
very plainly
it's our job to pull it out and it's our job is a nah we're not going all out
abducted