Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
You see,
I don't even think that it was necessary to use
military forces.
If
say, from my point of view,
maybe
other people hold
different perspective.
But it seems to me that if would
Belarusian military command
district surround
three located in Belovezhskaya Pushcha
lap,
place condition so ready to say
sign in the case conversation
immediately developed
document surveyed residents that during the first
if you think you take away
inefficient
But it's not even important. The most important thing
was that,
that,
I talked about this with Gorbachev
yours truly too
presence in many
Is must be started with the economic agreement
Now, if there were a contract signed
in a single economic
space,
I think it would be a step
to conservation updated
modernized
completely
the abandonment of most of the darkest pages
of History
of Soviet Union.
You know, because Gorbachev
responded,
publicly responded to
the day after as we
expressed these concerns.
He said that he did not go to
economic agreement first because
then few people will sign
the political. About political already have
considered as an agreement.
But it was not simple considered, was not considered
economic need that
space arises
supranational political
structure inevitably,
inevitably.
Therefore, since economic
agreement to this were ready very many
and even baltic was that had already gone
gone by
decision of
Supreme Soviet of the USSR.
But they were even willing to talk about
preservation
single economic
space
No answer what it is, certainly not enough
Sure enough, but is a huge contribution
then to pass decay.
And then you think, we should not compare
situation even now.
There is no analogy. Why? Because,
then while
territorial, eg ,
distribution of means of production.
All were linked in a single unit
in the Soviet Union.
Economically. When occurred here this
break everything all lost.
All lost.
Maybe Russia in less
because it is larger, it is more powerful,
and it
economically more developed, etc. but
lost everything.
AND
here do not have any issues.
Now it is independent
states that already come a long
path
on
the rail of independence which has ties
formed with both China and the West and
so on. This is another completely
picture.
But still, even now
establishing the economic
single space
and if things go
until the end in this respect now
we have agreement on
This occasion
with Belarus and Kazakhstan as well.
Maybe Kyrgyzstan to join this ,
if if things go in this regard then
this course
one of the pillars
of what happens, in general,
will not decay
and discord. No, I do not think that this
analog Soviet Union.
Now analog Soviet Union
can not be.
See, but integration
pool, it
fans laws which act
everywhere.
If we can engage in these
laws,
objective laws
and now transnational
peppered take narrow activities
integration process
state level,
is an objective law of our
era
If we can enter into this
case and
generally take this form
and fill our content,
content which will not differ
radically from what made
in the west,
but at the same time there will be more
consider national
interests of each,
from each state
I think it would be a plus more. No I do not think.
In Europe this applies Now, of course it
somehow lead to consequences very
seriously.
So I remember my conversation
Percentage man whom I
respect,
much. This
Shmit, former Chancellor
Germany
He is now in 92, in 90s but is
light head.
Here, I have with him
last year talking very
interesting. He I said sure
here's what's happening now here in eurozone
's involved.
say one time he believes that it can
cause one side can be
several integration
States more closely
closer
Does that enter the area
and foreign policy and military affairs so
hereinafter.
And of course
different attitude
so that conceded only that
The European Union, which is already
is a long time and operating
requirements.
I think that, in general, then click here
NATO and Yugoslavia,
it could be in the Soviet Union is
already been done without Security Council ,
security without light .
And of course it
but I'll tell you more.
United States
factory generally after
disintegrated Soviet Union
in the first 90 years - s,
our foreign policy,
early years, so can be here in the first
half of the 90s,
it was completely aimed at
fact that we followed
fairway with the Russians that the main pain
= = Duma
Ministry of Foreign Affairs
administrator told that
one by any means necessary in a civilized
world.
And everything else is shantrapa.
Now if if if
And they could not come such
opinions and there may even be
prevails in some quarters
and therefore
increased some,
desire to act
independently, without paying
attention
to Russia, the Soviet Union.
Sholokhov what
Well, after because Russia
drastically changed its foreign policy,
as you said, we
Was right followed the United States
including that took some advice
in the economic field.
How did it cost for the country such
indecisiveness of that period?
Very expensive.
In economics, we have lost more than
in the Second World War.
That's the answer.
And if you speak truly,
ie seysas physically
enable all
Look
exchange, so to speak ,
that occur between the court in London
Berezovsky and Abramovich ,
split that was a horrible
things completely disclosed as
Roofs
because business to the Crimea and stay where
as general
yes then how privatized and
so on, in these conditions, as
dnipro sollers
Impossible to talk about what that pros in
90s
But if we talk about the national idea ,
this is not yet formulated
the present.
But everybody lives in order to
live better
so that
country would
safer.
This is, this is the demographic
situation should be corrected very
much.
Economic model is necessary to be changed, because
what we had
before the crisis, and so on, then transfer the model to
the future simply impossible.
All this, all this is clear. But of these, here
separate task consists
national idea.