Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
Iran has the world's second largest gas sources, right behind Russia.
But Iran - of inexplicable reasons, hates Israel, that is, the United States.
Israel, with a lack of origin, adherent to his big brother - with the USA,
stay more and more alone in this ample world. They hang out.
They still dictate, but others take them as less seriously as longer.
Since the army of the Israel - financed and armoured by Americans, believed to be invincible,
was ironed out by handful Arab partisans in south Lebanon 3,5 years ago,
Israel has dared to fling its troops only against defenceless Palestinian cities, like Gaza,
where no shot comes back from, because they're weaponless.
Since the USA even with its most frightful army in the world hasn't been able to keep order in Iraq
besides, like humiliated, they have to pay to their enemy: to the Talibans in Afghanistan,
so they and their weaker retainers are taken less and less seriously.
Until they attack with rockets from a 1000 km distance or by aircraft,
the technical superiority is at a high level.
But, to occupy a whole country they need footmen,
who would have to smook out the patriots house by house.
Sorry, the terrorists. Correctly said: the partisans. But, I've just received the news: fundamentalists!
I must correct it: the rebels.
The infighting causes huge bloody casualties,
because of which Israel fell in south-Lebanon in summer 2006.
It's understandable from the point of view of both Washington and Tel-Aviv
that the USA would like to harden its domination in the world economy, world policy and world military,
before the new world order comes.
To succeed, it would want to take the world's crude oil fields, because this is how both producers
and consumers can be blackmailed; for instance, Russia as a consumer and China as a producer.
Besides, until the USA is the world power of these fields, it doesn't have to touch its own stocks, reserves,
it can be stored for times in the dry tree, e.g. times of isolation.
Iran is the smallest enemy of the USA today.
Because its largest economic rival - and ally, friend at once, is the EU.
But it's very easy to destroy that.
For instance, to inhibit it by blockades and threatening so it's not able to use the natural gas from Iran,
which could be much cheaper at last
and then the Nabucco wouldn't bring the gas from the Caspi region from a russian interest,
by which the defencelessness of the EU is strenghtened, but the Iranian gas.
Now when the stress around Iran is continuous - - because Iran, the "perfidious",
also dared to realize its nuclear program, like Israel,
well, the USA and Russia would only profit of that.
Because until Iran isn't allowed to transport the gas to Europe, Moscow can keep a tight hold
over many European governments.
And, if the USA attack Iran, pressured or provoked by Israel,
there'd be three birds killed with one stone:
the war with Iran would cause the vessel traffic in the Persian Gulf impossible,
through the strait of Hormuz which is yet controlled by Iran, too.
But, Japan, the dangerous rival - even for the EU, China and USA,
also gets most of its crude oil throug this place, from the Arabian Peninsula and Iran.
Which means, in case of a war with Iran these would be left without fuel: Europe, China and Japan.
So, if the lightning war stays longer, well, we will have to walk on foot very long, feeling our way,
in the light of the lightnings...
Although the USA would get the only power, its main rivals would be destroyed: the EU, Japan and China.
China - with its 10 % increase in its GDP a year, devours the imported crude oil with a huge apetite.
While China is the biggest investor in Iran,
and owner of present or future petroleum and natural gas enterprises.
Iran is a strategy area of China, its bridge-head, in the Arabian and Mussulman world.
The second "fly": in case of an Iranian war it would stop buying russian weapons.
Because, an american victory wouldn't be interested in products of the Kalashnikov-trust.
But, since Iran was shafted disingenuously by Moscow with the delay of the air defence system,
for which made Obama to deny the installment of polish and czech missile bases,
well in case Iran gets under the control of U.S.,
not only Russia would loose its weapon buyer,
also the situation of the Caucasian area, Caspian east bank, and Inner Asia would get threatened,
although it's still in Russian interest and the crude oil and natural gas
both come from that place by russian coverage to Europe.
Besides, by an annexation of Iran the USA would gain the Iranian gas fields,
which are the second largest in the world, behind the Russians'.
No doubt, as it happened in Iraq, in Iran also American companies would privatize the gas and oil stocks.
The liberalised crude oil and natural gas fields would wreck Russia
which makes Europe dependent on Iran and America.
And, the Chinese enterprises would be able to get off, like the Russian ones from Iraq back then.
Which means, not only China, Russia also isn't interested in an Iranian war,
mainly not in a fast American victory...
The third "fly": By a blast on Iran, Israel would prove again that the USA couldn't be without it,
because these times the USA has made such a headway in the area,
taken off so many Arabian lands, that Israel got to be redundant for the USA and found itself on the periphery.
Israel got to be a too expensive bridge-head, and steals a lot from the huge American sponsorship
and those luxury bridge-heads, where they have to do nothing because America jumps when they whistle,
they make only troubles to Washington today.
One of the problems of Israel that it's not attractive. They're more repulsive,
since even the Washington's Jewish lobby like to be in Washington, or in New York, than at their ancestors' land.
But, who would want to live in the sea with many-hundred millions of enemy around,
in the shadow of the vengeance that is round the corner?
Even if the USA deploys Patriot-rockets in Israel.
The civil population would have to be evacuated at the times of a world conflict to the not so far Europe.
into isolated subdivisions that are already built up or still in construct, by ships, planes..
And the Jewish population would have to settle there temporarily or permanently.
It all depends on that if Israel should be uphold or they have to close the doors,
finally acknowledged, that Israel was an unnecessary historical investment with horribly high number of victims.