Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
What do you think about today's session?
Well, you see, it was a circus show!
They ask the witness, and he describes them
his personal routine working process in a normal company.
Certainly that was particularly swelled,
when the public prosecutor has asked the witness of charge:
“What actually was a key task of the company’s rearrangement?” -
“It was … to make everything transparent”.
Well, most probably it was a great sin
and a real crime in our circumstances
getting rid of opacity in the company
and trying to do one’s best to reach its world business level transparency.
Please, mind Michail Borisovich was the first head of the big company
who has done it!
And here we are: as a result he was arrested
not those whose business is still non-transparent.
Today the witness has told that 1995’ company takeover
was amicable and everything was proceeding without any changes.
Do you think it’s the same argument as “everything was transparent”?
Anyhow, everything was done voluntarily.
And Michail Borisovich was absolutely right asking the witness:
“Well well, you were always paid for your work.
Were you conscience-stricken obeying these orders?
Did you act against your conscience?” -
“No, I didn’t. I discharge out my normal working duties. That's all “.
Isn’t it strange for you the third ten of witnesses of charge
has already given evidence actually shows that
Yukos was working transparently,
oil was producing, and all taxes were paid?
All one can possibly do is to sympathize with public prosecutors:
where they, poor souls, could find the witnesses of charge
ready to testify to the fact which cannot exist because…
it doesn’t exist.
Even I do understand it is impossible to steal all oil.
Even more:
if they have stolen all that oil how has it happened
they paid all taxes for it? It is such nonsense!
Are ones a Solomon they will not find witnesses of a fact ever happened.
Yet they, poor souls, are still trying.