Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
Looking at violence, because we know the people that created this architecture are
intensely violent people, we simply have to call a spade a spade, but my forte
is the psychic violence that they are involved in not so much the physical form
its the psychic dictatorship, 'The war on consciousness'' as I have expressed it.
That doesn't mean we have to lose sight of the other causes it is important to know
about these puppet masters and all of the tentacles and methodologies that they use.
Its important to know about the royals its important to know about the Zionists and
the Jesuits and the Masonic crypto-Jews the Jesuits and the whole other cocktail...
These are the pathogens right.
The doctor has to have a complete diagnosis, you have to look at it all but
you look at it with an open mind you continue to walk around it keep looking
at it but make sure that you stand back from the canvas so that you get an
overview and all the time look for those nuances look for that subtlety.
We all, sitting in this room, know there's something
wrong and that we have to get on the scent...
And yeah this sort of conspiratorial phenomena is almost like something
alien almost like something you have dug out of a quarry, it
can blow up at any minute, you have to explore it and its fascinating
and its not something you can come at with a narrow vision.
Basically ''Age Of Manipulation'' is a series that deals with and especially
this presentation deals with ''where are we going?'' Are we going to
be the same people tomorrow, next year down the line 10 years from now
are we actually going to be the same kind of creatures that we are now?
I mean the forces that have been working to develop this architecture work outside our
periphery even when they appear to be working
in front of us, there working on the periphery.
As any clever conspirators do, when they want to change
the habitat outside the knowledge of the actual animal.
The training goes on outside our vision as well
as right in front of us in a more overt way.
So the question is these subtle changes all add up to something, they're
quantitative and I've got questions what's in store for the human race?
Will we be the same people that we are now, say, in 10 years?
Steve Quayle we can use his quote to introduce today's presentation
dealing with the post-human agenda the trans-humanistic agenda.
He says that a terrifying future thunders towards man kind an impending fate embodied
by monstrous, blasphemous combinations of human and animal genetic materials,
of man machine cyborgs, and of beings not only with increased capacities and
extended life spans, but also with re-engineered morality void of compassion.
This future is so abhorrent as to almost defy the imagination.
These new beings and the trans-humanists looking
forward to their arrival, will not be benevolent.
Just the opposite.
Because the goal of those creating these beings will be that they
replace human beings, that the new race will be post humans.
The word ''posthuman'' sounds, innocuous enough,
until one realizes that ''post'' means ''after''.
Of course this has been predicted by many prophets down through the years.
In my book I write that: In the Posthuman World we will
not experience our own existence as something real.
We are already more than half way down the road toward this ''hyper real'' state.
Self hood ends: we function but do not exist.
Consciousness as we know it ceases to exist.
Man ceases to be conscious of internal processes,
because they emptied themselves into the ''Umwelt.''
This he does as a pseudo-self.
Everything he does, even if it appears noble or spiritual
- such as going to a therapist, counsellor, coach,
or joining some apparently progressive sect or cult,
is done as a pseudo-self, not as an Imperial Self.
(this is my term to distinguish the true self as opposed to the pseudo self).
Gimmick cures and trendy solve-alls of every variety imaginable
serve to decorate the empty life of the pseudo-self.
Activities of this kind have no lasting effect and are
merely escapes born from the avoidance of legitimate
suffering and legitimate anxiety; (Wait a minute I thought
that all anxiety and fear is terrible is to be avoided.
What do you mean Michael legitimate suffering legitimate anxiety?
Yeah the kind that comes with birth, life and change)
In the world of tomorrow, HUMAN 2.
0 exists but is lost to himself.
The consequences of the death of individuality must be seriously contemplated.
The man who has murdered his individuality cannot hope to
register and respect the individuality of those he meets.
When you enter his life he sees you as a thing rather than a person.
He sees a ghost shadow or mannequin without feelings.
Because of his inner void, he is incapable of dealing
with men and women as thinking, feeling beings.
He is perfectly immune to feeling and has a purely mechanistic and
functional relationship with the world and the human beings around him.
Every man and woman hearing this is in danger either of
becoming such a being or of encountering one (or more).
This ''Global Village'' well maybe I don't want to live there with these people.
I don't mind the global village maybe its the people living in it that's my problem.
But when we talk about extinction right 9 times out of 10 you're thinking about
flora and fauna it never really occurs to us that other things can go extinct.
Whole ways of seeing can go extinct.
Whole levels of critical ability, of understanding, of judgment
of creative abilities, the whole idea that we can even choose.
Right you turn a computer off it cannot choose to turn itself on.
A computer cannot choose other than its programming, you can.
All those things that are being genocided culturally, racially, its on the periphery
half of us aren't even aware that its happening the whole world is changing
children are growing up in a world that's almost like an incarceration ''the
gulag'' and there not even aware of it because how could they be aware of it?
They don't even know what there missing.
As I said predicted by many we'll just look at one
guy Aldus Huxley ''Brave New World Revisited.''
In 1931, when Brave New World was being written, I
was convinced that there was still plenty of time.
The completely organized society, the scientific caste
sys-tem, the abolition of free will by methodological
condition-ing, the servitude made acceptable by
regular doses of chemically induced happiness.
(That's a good one, love that one.
I'm for that Chemically induced happiness.
Cant wait) these things were coming all right, but not
in my time, not even in the time of my grandchildren...
Twenty-seven years later, in this third quarter of the twentieth century...
I feel a good deal less optimistic than I did when I was writing Brave New World...
But if you go down to the pub and you tell your mates
the exact same thing they will think your crazy.
Its alright for Aldus Huxley, its alright for the guy on top of
totem pole to complain, predict and see that hell is coming!
But if you say it they say call up the guys in the white coats.
What are you talking about?!
He says: In the West, it is true, individual men
and women still enjoy a large measure of freedom.
But even in those countries that have a tradition of democratic government,
this freedom and even the desire for this freedom seem to be on the wane.
(The desire for freedom is on the wane?) In the rest of the world
freedom for individuals has already gone, or is manifestly about to go.
The nightmare of total organization...
has emerged from the safe, remote future and is now
awaiting us, just around the next corner, he says.
Names are important aren't they?
I call them the Atonists, the Davids, Davids because
it connotes the word ''dividers'' divide and rule.
You see what I said in the beginning the war on consciousness how do you do that?
Well we're already divided we have left hemisphere
right hemisphere, ego ID, conscious unconscious...
We are already self divided there jobs made easy.
But this act of division whether its emperialistic
and territorial or its psychic this ingredient,
that's what we're going to be doing today we're going
to be looking at these ingredients of tyranny.
That's how you become immune to what there doing.
You don't fight them with the weapons they're handing you.
You pull your knowledge you understand exactly how there
working so that nothing they do has any affect on you anymore.
Again from there own writings.
Dr G. Brock Chisholm one of the boss hogs involved in this nonsense globalism.
He says: To achieve world government, it is
necessary to remove from the minds of men their
individualism, loyalty to family traditions, national patriotism and religious dogmas.
Vernor Vinge, you will notice some of the double
speak and also the fact that its a very gradual
process they understand that they are Fabians they
understand that this doesn't happen over night.
We are on the edge of change comparable to the rise of human life on Earth...
Within 30 years we will have the technological means to create superhuman intelligence.
Shortly after, the human era will end.
Who would even think in terms of that.
That's what we are going to be looking at.
What kind of consciousness are we talking about here.
Curtis R. Schafer.
The ultimate achievement of bio-control may be the control of man himself...
The controlled subjects would never be permitted to think as individuals...
a surgeon would equip each child with a socket mounted under the
scalp and electrodes reaching selected areas of brain tissue...
the child's sensory perceptions and muscular activity could be modified or completely
controlled by bio-electric signals radiating from state-controlled transmitters.
We went into this in Architects of control they cant wait for the
remote controlled being that is better fun then killing us all off.
But of course technology emulating thought bio-control, bio-organic
computers, well we're the thinking animals so called we've evolved
to think mans a thinking animal, but if our thinking becomes
mechanical than of course we are going to be outdone by computers.
We don't need the globalists to tell us that its simple logic
any high school teacher can tell you that is what is coming.
If indeed thought is only mechanical, yep we are
definitely going to be replaced by machines.
What I hope to show tonight is thinking, what we call thinking
is anything but a mechanical anything BUT a mechanical process.
Its a mechanical process for these characters not for us.
But again what are we thinking about are we even aware we are
thinking beings do we observe what constitutes a thought.
Do we realize that we are both a listener and a speaker?
That we have a perpetual inner dialog going on all the time, an incredible inner dialog
between our own hemispheres of our own being,
so fascinating it almost defies description.
But you see ''human being'' that interesting term, as a
matter of fact 'human' doesn't really mean that much.
Human is a biological, anthropological or I would say a scientific term.
You know you have a Neanderthal standing here and this, its
just the flesh, bones and blood that's human, humanoid.
But it says ''human being'' now the word being does not mean anything biologically.
Its a philosophical term by the way, the 'human' that's scientific
that's tangible, that's physical that's flesh and blood.
Now 'being' is the whole other intangible, transcendent states of consciousness
that goes on in the immaterial sense therefore its basically a philosophical term.
Rollo May the existential psychologist explained it better then I he said: ...being
is a category which cannot be reduced to introspection of social and ethical norms.
It is, to use Nietzsche's phrase, ''beyond good and evil.''
To the extent that my sense of existence is authentic, it
is precisely not what others have told me I should be,
but is the one Archimedes point I have to stand on from
which to judge what parents and other authorities demand.
The full meaning of the term ''human being'' will
be clearer if the reader will keep in mind that
''being'' is a participle, a verb form implying
that someone is in the process of being something.
It is unfortunate that, when used as a general noun in
English, the term ''being'' connotes a static substance.
(But it is not it is an act of becoming) And we judge each other and we judge ourselves
about our goals and our projections into the future which granted its hypothetical
construct purely mental, the future simply doesn't exist in scientific terms but it
does mentally, so we have incredible mental capacities that we take for granted.
But its because of this ability to project into the future
for good or for ill that the ''being'' comes into it.
Everything else about us is about the now, you blink now, you
breath now, you eat now, you see your heart pulsates now.
Our physicality positions us or our bodies
lets say, positions us in the now, but we have
another consciousness that can think in terms of the past or think about the future.
Time in other words.
That very act of thinking about the past and the future and the
subcategory of that is before and after, these are concepts of time.
Time is extremely important in the spiritual development, in
the journey of spirituality its something that's under attack.
We will see how time itself is skewed to serve the masters.
Rolo May goes on to say: Therefore ''becoming'' connotes more accurately the
meaning of the term in this country so being and becoming he says are equivalent.
We understand another human being only when we see what he is moving towards, what he
is becoming and we can know ourselves only when we project our potential into action.
Oh dear time for that German lesson.
I say best we get it over early and lessen the agony.
Its three words basically, there's no very good English translations.
It comes from existential philosophy but also an
interesting subcategory existential psychology.
Quite unknown in the West or in America and Britain.
Its the idea that all of us are three beings in one.
We are a trinity.
Umwelt, we are born into a world we come out of the womb and there's
this thing and if you actually think about it we start off very small.
All we know is the mother then we know the other parent brothers
and sisters perhaps, uncles and aunts perhaps the rotten
neighbours perhaps and then this other thing called the wider
community and as we age, do you see what's also happening?
Our consciousness is spreading until we find out about the world, the
planet, countries, the other races and then bigger and then finally God up
there in the clouds somewhere, and the whole universe around us if you
actually think about it it never happens the other way, that's a certainty.
And that is the world around us.
Umwelt the world into which we're born for some of us, the neurotics,
it feels uncomfortable, very threatening in fact for everybody,
its very threatening but for others, no, its threatening but it
has other elements as well, but your in relationship with it.
But we will start off very simply and say that the Umwelt is the
world around us, the biological world, the environment, nature.
Then there's the Mitwelt from the German ''Mit'' which means
with, with world, that's all of us, every other human being.
I think animals would fit into Umwelt but Mitwelt is the
human being, others like us with whom we can communicate.
Then the last one is Eigenwelt which is your own
personal inner world many of the materialists,
positivists, novelists, physicalists don't even believe
there is such a thing but we will get to that later.
Again we will start off very simply.
Umwelt, Mitwelt and Eigenwelt, three worlds all interlocked, interrelating and
obviously that these worlds exist theres three kinds of relationships, is there not.
Each of us has to have three slightly different or
quite significantly different relationships with each.
Maybe somebody's focus is more on the Mitwelt, all we
care about is the people like ourselves, we don't really
care too much about animals, the world, the universe
the stars or what God might be having for dinner...
Whats out there in the bigger sense, right?
For others its all internal I'm off to the mountains
to sit in a cave and, you know, contemplate my navel.
So there's all kinds of different kinds of relationships.
Naturally in a normal situation they ebb and flow and there not neurotic
relationships, but lets just take or use this first hour to just briefly look at this.
Umwelt is the natural world to which we can only really
adjust, now I know that the people at the pent houses
of science and the penthouses of technology always have
this pipe dream that they're really affecting nature.
Actually they're really affecting very little.
What we do as human beings is adjust to nature.
Right you put up a sale and just hope that the wind is going to take you
and a tidal wave doesn't come and crush your little boat into pieces.
So the vast majority of human life from the dawn of time has been the
adjustment not the control over or not the changing of nature, you cannot
change the fundamental principals of the world of nature the climate, the
seasons, the weather, famine, devastation, earthquakes, aging or death.
Even though you can throw millions of dollars
at it but it is debatable weather your really
changing it and even if you change that, there
something else that you have to handle now.
I mean a child, a toddler cannot tell its parents and
teachers what to do, they tell the child what to do.
So we come into the world with this world that we
have very little affect over and in the end we adjust
to it and reams could be written about our relationship
with the Umwelt its its own study you see.
You couldn't talk about the Umwelt and about adjusting to it without talking about time
again, time we adjust to, that thing, the
seasonal clock, the solar calendar, the yearly
cycle or the lunar cycle in some places and on a wider, any Hegelian's in the room they
all know that on the wider level its a historical process we are creatures of our age.
We all like to think of ourselves as doctor who and can
flip around from age to age, we wouldn't bloody like it.
We are embed in our age, we are creatures of our
age, we effect the age and the age affects us.
We wouldn't do very well elsewhere, I mean you can prove this
to yourself by going to a third world culture and trying it.
Our age makes us and we make it.
So there's the historical process to bear in mind, too,
and how it conditions and changes who we are as it is with
Michel Foucalt, Hegel the great thinker on this concept, and
time, our relationship to time of course has down sides.
Time is good because remember we spoke about the
future, that's the measure of our creativity.
That's the measure of our productivity.
We use time for that.
In fact its an essential ingredient in authenticity,
we know that in the end of time very soon, 28,000
days you know 70 summers we're going to die, so the
concept of thinking about that moment does what?
Well you don't need the existential psychologist yo tell
you it gives you meaning and the lucidity to your life.
Kind of like you feel that you live your life more immanently or hopefully with
more lucidity because you know its going to end its not going to go on forever.
So time has a very great bearing on our philosophical state of living our level and
depth of consciousness not that we just live in time quantity but quality of life.
How do you make one day into a year?
How do you hold eternity in the palm of your hand?
Well you wouldn't if life just continued on forever.
But of course there's down sides as well, there's the materialist relationship
with time which is not very good because then we're slaves to the clock.
Slaves of that seasonal process, slaves of the weeks and the months and almost this
hypothetical turning of the weeks, seven day slavery enslavement which does what?
Your so committed to it your embedded in it, your so
entangled in it that what happens as a consequence?
Once you start losing connection with the inner clock, the inner chronology.
That's why I spend that much of my life doing
divination because that's trying to rectify that, tip
the balance a little bit in our favor, to work
with that inner time again, that inner chronology.
That's why I love divination so much its because you can get back in touch
with that psychological chronology; because we are so entangled in the other.
Mitwelt well whats that?
Whats the down side of that?
The constant entanglement in the lives of other people.
And sometimes we have to be so, we come into the world
people are older there smarter there more powerful.
There going to tell us what to do.
The child is surrounded by dictators from day one.
''Now your out of control'' you often hear that your out of control...
Your bloody right!
Basically some of the Mitwelt is like this: Even a single glance at a passer by
or glancing at somebody on a bus for a split second changes you and that person.
You may notice the shoes there wearing that could
lead to a whole Alfred Hitchcock cocktail of drama.
Oh I'm going to go and buy those shoes, I'm going to search the town,
I get into this relationship, I get into that, the heal breaks etc.
The slightest thing, oh I like that leather jacket, I
cant be content until I have one, and you just start
thinking about all the amazing twilight scenarios
that can come from the most amazingly small thing.
Jeez!
But if I love you, I've changed you, if I kill you, I've changed you, haven't I?
Yeah, we're talking about the effects.
Big brother?
Common, every human being even a passer by is changing us and
we are changing them let alone the more intimate situations.
And when we say conformity, the down side to the Mitwelt, because
when we say conformity that's what we really mean where talking about
Mitwelt here, conformity because of that dictatorship and the
pressure to conform, the pressure to conform to the will of others.
Life long antagonism there.
But of course its a question of degree.
How much are we overwhelmed most of us can go through life without having
too much of problem, but what happens once that's about to heat up?
What about in the future?
That's what where asking the question.
It might be tolerable now...
My question one of the great themes of this talk is
that ''Are we what others have made us?'' Is that it?
I mean that's central, it᾽s this non ceasing question that I have.
I mean how could it not be?
''Oh what can we do Michael?'' every email that I get, ''What
can we do, what can we do?'' when are we all going to wake up.
Well, waking up and shaking up are two different things, a person can be shaken up
by
recent events or the stuff that's going on in there lives, but its not quite the same
thing as waking up, that's a process that
requires a whole different kind of commitment,
a different kind of alienation and a different kind of relationship with yourself.
Shaking up?
Well anybody can do that.
But the 'we'' ''us'' and ''our'' that needs to be investigated.
I get the creeps when I hear those words.
I smell a rat.
But these myriad of demands and adjustments, right, the constant modification
of our being with all of this, to the Umwelt and also to the Mitwelt.
But whats underneath it?
Is there not this consistent ''I'' running all the way through?
Think of all your experiences from day one, I mean those are millions of left turns
and right turns that you have made, ups and downs of mood changes of personality.
You are not the same person you where when you where a teenager and so on, but is
there not (this is not he case of course with severely neurotic people and this is
the problem they have the psychotic people) in a normal human being what is know
today as the biographical self the perpetual self that seems to be like a shadow.
Looking down from the plane you know we could
see the shadow moving across the landscape
at an incredible speed your going really slow
and its moving across vast tracks of land.
That's a continual ''I'' a perpetual, the biographical self
negotiating all of these contours and ups and downs of life.
Now how does that happen?
How does the Eigenwelt do that?
We are not saying that it doesn't have great breaks,
this thing goes through unbelievable changes.
Our own biographies are absolutely fascinating,
if you can even think how many things your actual
hand has touched in this life it would defy
imagination and that's all recorded in your mind.
As I said this concept of this inner ''I'' this inner continuity is
refuted by materialists, positivists we will get to that latter.
But the good thing about the Eigenwelt is that
this is the place that you have the maximum amount
of responsibility, will and freewill and free
choice, its also the center of your self esteem.
Its where you have the most dominion you will ever have, because as I
say the dominion over the Umwelt is negotiable, largely quite low.
As you probably know by now, your control over other
people is limited and fraught with all sorts of problems.
But in the inner world is where the largest focus of free will can be,
again except if your a neurotic person they have trouble with that.
Its also the place where you can ignore your own needs, right, its the place
where you can abandon your own needs while your absorbed by other things.
Now Edward Edinger the psychologist said: The Self is born, but the ego is made.
Because as a matter of fact, when you talk about the Eigenwelt you have to
also speak in terms of or realize that we are divided within, are we not?
I kind of alluded to it earlier, but anyway, we are not a whole being within.
We have the imperial self and then we have this
thing called the ego, the ego being a construct.
A construct of our physical existence in the exact way that Freud and others have
described, its just another brain, its just a machine, this program by existence.
But the ''I'' or the self has a different kind of
programming in it so to speak, and we jump between the two.
Its a constant oscillation, a reciprocal relationship between these two.
Obviously one physical body as I said is much the same
as another, but its always important to point out
that we have existence but we also know that we have
an existence, we have the awareness that we exist.
We don't only experience existence, we are aware of it.
We think about what we think about thought.
And we can even think about the fact that we are thinking about thought.
And what is all this?
Well for me these are the miracle, these are the many
rooms and facets of the inner landscape, right, the
Mitwelt and the Umwelt is the external landscape, we have
an entire landscape within that's under investigated.
An inner internal environment.
A tragedy, what happens?
What happens in a tragedy?
Fade to gray, right the Mitwelt and the Umwelt fade to
gray and maybe for the first time in many peoples lives.
I'm hoping its not true for everyone sitting here but for most peoples
lives, from the very first time they have a tragedy in there lives
is the only time that energy sort of retreats and they start paying
attention to this inner world and also the question of there existence.
And perhaps there relationship with time improves because of it.
The Eigenwelt the consciousness of our consciousness
is the part of us that asks the important questions.
It doesn't matter if other people ask them.
It doesn't matter if anyone, I don't care if its
Dostoevsky or whoever it was, doesn't matter
if it was Nietzsche or whoever, it only matters
when you ask those fundamental questions.
Who am I?
Why do I exist?
What am I doing here?
We open these points in Architects of Control in the very first
statements of that program, again trying to anchor it in the
philosophy and the psychology because that's whats really
important not our immersion in the whole domestic ''menusia''.
Its important to always remember what constitutes
our true humanness, or, more correctly, our being.
The flesh and blood stuff can be measured and
calibrated, being is vast and can not be so measured.
Now one other thing about Eigenwelt about you about
the inner being i something that was brought up
by many philosophers Martin Heidegger but especially
by the French philosopher Maurice Merleau-Ponty.
It was something that blew the philosophical world to pieces.
We're not going to go into all the details.
I just want to overview what he was saying and that is:
Just by the very facts that you have a body, you nucleate
the subject-object dichotomy which had been plaguing
philosophy, plaguing thinkers for thousands of years.
Meaning that everything I am looking at right now is considered an object
of thought in the philosophical traditions, that I am the subject, right.
Ponty said, no the whole thing is founded on a lie, because
the organ of perception by which you perceive object
is subjective isn't, you mind and your thinking and
your act of perception is part of your subjective self.
But you have a body just like objects have a body, and when he said
body he meant the glass of water, the table, everything is an object.
Your body is an object of your subjective thought, so a human beings
mind and the act of perception nucleates the subject object dichotomy.
So that any other teachers any other gurus or any
other techniques even despite the fact that you...
may not even know this, you are already a transcendent
being who has nucleated opposites that's what you are.
When you know it it helps.
So when we are running around trying to find a technique seeking guidance
from the miss guided, we are it already and one can string this out its
a fascinating idea of the simple fact that the ''I'' cannot see itself,
but the ''I'' is the link between the subject world and the object world.
But of course one of the large parts of what we
are going to look at as we wind down towards the
solution section is this whole anatomy of tyranny
never forgetting to explore how big brother works.
That will involve a deeper understanding of these relationships
that we have but it also has to do with the question of anxiety.
Its fundamental.
Anxiety meaning the kind of angst fear that arises when we have these kind of
relationships with these relationships we have with the Umwelt, Mitwelt and our self.
Anxiety arises, anxiety arises.
And we have to understand allot about that if we are going to
stop slashing at the branches of evil and cut at the root.
All these pressures of the Miltwelt, all these
pressures from other people cause in us anxiety.
Why?
Because we are seeking to conform.
We are asked to conform the world we didn't really
create and that maybe we don't even like we need to
get along, go along to get along, because its a demand
that's placed upon our heads a tremendous amount
of anxiety arises topically in the attempt to be liked
to be approved and to fit into all the subscribed
roles so there's one level of anxiety from that as
we interface with other people in the Miltwelt.
Then as implied in the opening statements, something else happens,
in order to adjust to the Miltwelt we don't really do it as an
imperial self we do it as a pseudo self so we have to *** and
masquerade we play an act, a performance, a pretence in order to adjust.
So there's not only an anxiety but there's a creation of a pseudo self.
The actor.
And that pseudo self is a counterfeit self and
the ego, that which is referred to as the
''ego'' is basically just the operating system, that moves, its the engine behind that.
Now that doesn't mean that you blame the ego.
The ego is just doing what its instructed to do.
Its just doing what its instructed to do.
Blaming it and cursing it is pure hog wash, its a sign of
a false teacher when they tell you to denounce the ego.
But you see this pseudo self ends up in allot of problems allot of traps
waiting for it because you may want approval, you may want to fit in.
But you don't always get what you want, so now there another kind
of anxiety that arises because your not getting the fulfillment.
You don't think your good enough and people get profoundly
disenchanted as we know allot of people may withdraw
and block it out and that's what allot of the boredom
and depression comes from and other neurotic symptoms.
They become, some of these, very very severe.
Because once you have learned to depend entirely
on other people for your sense of well-being.
That's when the whole labyrinth begins right there.
When we don't get it when we don't get what we want,
not only do we become depressed we become aggressive.
Anxious yes but we become aggressive.
Do you think I mean aggressive only to other people, yes 9 out of 10 times when we
talk about anger and aggression its only about projecting it towards other people.
No, no, no I've said many times that's been documented umpteen times.
Michael Tsarion is not so much about the violence
that's on record the history books are full of it.
I'm talking about the self hatred, we are going to get into that latter
on, turning the aggression against the self because of this schism.
The feeling that you don't fit in, yeah what we do
to our selves and how that's been co-opted and how
this whole dynamic works the self accusatory and
sadistic temperament, you see, this is what concerns me.
As we said the problem of anxiety is two fold there's all
of this negative anxiety (the topical neurotic anxiety
is really the term for it) and then there is that strange
legitimate anxiety that we alluded to in the beginning.
Well what do you think that is?
The other kind of anxiety that is called legitimate is the anxiety of the
true self imperial self, that can barely squeak but its there never the less.
Its natural, its organic and its never going to die, it doesn't die, it doesn't perish.
It can be incarcerated it can be put inside of a box and
put into a box and put into a box but it never dies.
And that force is in constant resistance to all that clap
trap and all that hog wash, and it meats the resistance
from the subconscious that doesn't want that authentic
voice to be heard, and that's the legitimate anxiety.
The legitimate anxiety that feels overwhelmed by the
lie and everybody sitting in this room has been
''victimised'' by that, and its good that you have
been because you wouldn't be sitting here other wise.
Because the inner self the imperial self knows
full well that its under attack and there's
another kind of anxiety, the legitimate positive kind of anxiety that arises and if you
leave this room and only grasp from this talk
just this one principal it will really affect
your lives deeply and you will see why as we
proceed why its so overwhelmingly important.
Now this legitimate anxiety is ultimately intimately connected to.
What?
Life and death.
Am I wrong?
What did you experience when you came out of the womb?
What does every Freudian every doctor know?
That the child experiences overwhelming waves by what?
Being born!
Well that's legitimate anxiety because you took birth and with it walking side
by side with you, as you entered this world something was walking with you.
And when you go through a mini death which leads to a new birth does it not?
Because we don't just die once and are born once, my God this can
happen umpteen times in your life, that anxiety is going to be there.
That every moment at a death and a rebirth just like at
the first birth it will be attended by this anxiety.
It can never be any other way.
They are known as the rites of passage obviously.
So you well its a simple equation then, to try and terminate, to try
and sedate your anxiety this positive kind of anxiety is to do what?
Is to turn off the switches of life.
To turn off the very act of being born and dying and experiencing rebirth
again as we were meant to do all through these rites of passage.
And these rites of passage what do they do?
It has been described by so many different people.
I just describe it very simple.
There are changes in the way of seeing.
For some people that way of seeing narrows.
Heart breaks, pains, death, job loss, illness...
For others the rite of passage can be broadening.
Actually for all of us its both its an ebb and
flow that changes, obviously, not in just one way.
It is the way of seeing that is undergoing the change.
And again that is very positive.
These are the moments of agony and ecstasy.
But they will be attended by the anxiety as we said.
Rollo May he said: More than three decades ago, Freud singled out
anxiety as the crucial problem of emotional and behavioural disorders.
Further development of psychoanalysis has only substantiated
his proposition, until it is now recognised on all sides
that anxiety is the ''fundamental phenomenon of neurosis,''
or in Horney's term, the ''dynamic centre of neurosis.''
But not only in psychopathology; in the actions
of ''normal'' people as well as ''abnormal,'' it
is now recognised that anxiety is much more
prevalent than was suspected several decades ago.
From the viewpoint of dynamic psychology, Symonds accurately
notes that ''it would surprise most persons to realise how much
of their behaviour is motivated by a desire to escape anxiety
by either reducing it or disguising it in one way or another.
Nietzsche talk of the rites of passage he said: Man is the only
being who must constantly overcome himself in order to exist.
So there two kinds of neurosis.
I don't fit in I don't like myself because I don't fit in...
That's the neurotic kind and we want to disown the self that doesn't fit in.
Then we have the other kind of legitimate anxiety from the true self because its not
going anywhere, its born of nature its eternal, its not going to shut up and go away.
At birth, each human being inherits the objective sensual world
that is shared by strangers, animals, and all physical objects.
In addition to the world outside of himself,
the human being is aware of an inner world.
It is this awareness that makes the human being unique in the universe.
The existence of two separate worlds inevitably makes us feel divided.
We suffer anxiety by way of our attempts to find a balance
between the two worlds in which we have to live...
Well now that we sketched out these three realms, these three
facets of humanity, and a little bit about the three kinds of
relationships, we understand that the main focus of the attack upon
or by the architects of control is primarily on the Eigenwelt.
Its not that they don't, obviously as we know unleash there violent
acts on the Umwelt, look at the destruction of nature the ecocide.
Its not that they don't destabilise us racially, culturally and in all sorts of
other ways in the social sphere, but they reserve there finest weapons for...
This is the sum total of everything of what all
my work is about, is trying to put up a scope
finally on this concept of how they focused there
greatest weaponry on the psyche on the Eigenwelt.
That is the main target for these individuals.
So they say: You don't need to worry about what you
are, you just wait for us to tell you what you are.
You wont have to have any of that anxiety you will
just have to sit back and let us do all the work.
Let the collective determine it.
Let other people determine it.
When in fact who you are should never be determined by 'what'' you do.
It should be determined by who you are.
But time and time again we throw ourselves open to the influence of others.
Authorities such as parents, teachers, priests
and experts, instructors, psychologists, and so
on have a great deal of influence on how we exist
in the objective world (Umwelt, Miltwelt).
They should have less of an influence on how we
choose to exist within ourselves (Eigenwelt).
The architects of control seek to effect subtle changes on the Eigenwelt.
It is this influence that must be guarded against.
The Architects of Control have a head start on
us, because their influence is already working
through the efforts of our parents whose minds
are already largely colonised and infected.
Their influence forces us to accept and participate in the ''insanity of normality.''
Now Ayn Rand already says: We are fast approaching the stage of the ultimate inversion:
(remember the focus of the attack) the stage where the government is free to
do anything it pleases, while the citizens may act only by permission; which is the
stage of the darkest periods of human history, the stage of rule by brute force.
I've often talked about a second fall, you know,
some of the greatest myths are yet to happen.
What do I mean by some statement like that?
Because if we in fact lose the Eigenwelt if it gets aroded as it
is being eroded, don't you see that we already lose the world.
If you lose the Eigenwelt you lose the Umwelt and the Mitwelt.
So its all been taken care of...
The soul is lost.
This is the message the neurotics and psychotics never get.
There trying to adjust to the Mitwelt and the Umwelt right and sacrificing
and disowning and dividing and fragmenting and hating the self.
Not realising they're going to lose the very thing they where seeking.
Its like the serpent eating its own tale.
Cant win.
Wilhelm Reich said: We're barely understanding the awful
deviation and pathological degeneration of the human animal.
Now one could also say that there is another kind of legitimate
anxiety and that is the anxiety that: Yes you should
feel anxious when you are doing damage to your self, right,
so in many ways we can understand it, not lament it.
If your doing something so atrocious to your own psychology,
your own psyche perhaps you should be in a state of panic.
If your prostituting yourself to the world and to other people.
And this is the rouse of the controllers is it not?
This is why they are three steps ahead of us, literally
creating doses of this manufactured anxiety.
Its the focus of their attack.
H.L. Mencken said it: The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed...
and thus clamorous to be led to safety...
by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.
And here's the clincher.
Approximated Global Sales of Five Major 'Big Pharma' Companies 2004 $550 Billion
2010 $770 Billion Barrages and barrages of the topical kind of anxiety of the
stresses that cause the topical anxiety, right, pressures from all the other misguided
people, asking us to: Come and join us, belong, come over here its wonderful.
And we are feeling all stressed out and anxious right and the media
pores this out on a daily basis its been going on for decades.
Why are they doing this?
Because the more they step up this anxiety this topical kind
the neurotic anxiety the more we will seek alleviation from
it and in one way you could say that's a good thing its not
necessarily great to be going around with all that anxiety...
But what is Big Brother hoping for?
There hoping for, there focus is not on that, there
working on upgrading and overwhelming us because they
know when we go for the bromide, when we go to be sedated,
when we go to be tranquillized what goes with it?
The legitimate anxiety that keeps us alive the legitimate
anxiety that is the source of all life goes out with it!
And that is HUMAN 2.
0 and that is why all the media chaos is going because
they know its a trick, that when you go for the sedation
without even wanting it without even knowing it you
are throwing out the most precious thing that exists.
The legitimate anxiety goes into the trash along with the
neurotic kind and then you are left mutilated within, job done.
Mark Twain said: When we realise that the whole world
is mad all the mysteries of life stand explained.
I cant think of a better quote.
Arno Bruin called it the Insanity of Normality.
And we don't have sanity, we've probably never even had it.
What we have is pseudo sanity, the adjustment to insanity and madness.
Why not?
We are trying to adjust to something that is not ever going to stay static
do you think in our adjustment to the Mitwelt the Mitwelt stays static?
The Mitwelt is changing historically its always
changing so where are we going to find that?
Its like trying to build your house in the shadow of a tree.
How can you ever be non anxious, you see, in this type of interactivity?
Its impossible.
But these controllers love neurotics they hate sanity.
In fact the same person is under attack, Thomas Szasz some psychologists
R.D. Land these people have pointed out how the same
man is literally under attack 24/7 his there
worse threat and they want to incarcerate you
sometimes they do it physically they still do.
There's horror stories of the terms that they use and the
categorisation and the power trips to incarcerate and lock
people up who are sane under the title of insanity and
schizophrenia these categorisations that they have concocted.
To take care of you when you start thinking outside of the box.
Lang himself said: Insanity is a perfectly natural
adjustment to a totally unnatural and negative environment.
From the alienated starting point of our pseudo-sanity, everything is equivocal.
Our sanity is not 'true'' sanity.
Their madness is not ''true'' madness...
our ''normal'' ''adjusted'' state is too often the
abdication of ecstasy, the betrayal of our true
potentialities, that many of us are only too successful
in acquiring a false self to adapt to false realities.
We are being made in the shape of dead people.
People with an abscess at the centre of there
being, and they want to turn us into what they are.
Erich From says: ...in fact, it is the fully sane
person who feels isolated in the insane society -
and he may suffer so much from the incapacity to
communicate that it is he who may become psychotic.
Arno Gruen says the American psychologist, he says: The
people who strike as the most disturbed, the schizophrenics,
are the most radical opponents of this type of identification,
for they attempt to withdraw completely from our world.
They are accordingly regarded as dissociated.
See they want beckon to the lie, he doesn't, a
schizophrenic looks through you, he knows your power
games, he knows your dynamics, he knows what its all
about he has been having it since he was a child.
And he ops out mentally because he says I'm going to be immune in here.
I will still be free inside my mind, you will not take that away
from me when everything else has been compromised and prostituted.
Erich From goes on to say: The reason why social
scientists have not considered the question
of the optimal social conditions for man's
growth a matter of primary concern can be easily
discerned if one recognizes the sad fact that,
with a few outstanding exceptions, social
scientists are essentially apologists for and
not critics of the existing social system.
They don't want to fix you they want to put more earrings on the Mona Lisa.
Move the furniture around on the Titanic.
Fix what is not broken.
Oh Doctor Frankenstein's monster is depressed?
We will make him a female monster, he is happy now right?
He got what he wants.
One obscenity replaces another.
So these architects are working for tomorrows Global
Village, it is basically the resort for that gutted
emaciated, mutilated being who has already thrown out
both the neurotic anxiety and the legitimate anxiety.
What do I do now?
Well its Demolition Man, Judge Dread time.
Again what do we call them?
Collectivists?
Prometheans?
Communitarians?
Utopians?
Luciferians?
Atonists?
There agenda was The Ultimate Closed Society it used
to be called the campaign for world government now its
the World Federalist Movement its nothing more than
neo-feudalism you know, making us slaves and serfs again.
Indentured vassals and we go for it because we are so desperate for an overlord.
Max Webber the sociologist called it The Iron Cage of Bureaucracy.
You may not get an external mark but its certainly incarceration never the less.
You are mutual now.
They will take care of you.
One of the terms for this type of globalism and agenda is as coined by the French
philosopher Michel Foucault is Total Institution look it up very interesting read.
But of course there not going to present it as that, what we are talking
about here, no, no, no its Democracy, Freedom, Multi-Culturalism,
Brotherhood of Man, Civil Society, Oneness this word, this word
that doesn't mean anything oneness, oneness, everybody is one.
One what?
I'll tell you one what!
Ayn Rand says: A collectivist tyranny dare not enslave a country
by an outright confiscation of its values, material or moral.
It has to be done by a process of internal corruption.
The philosophers top psychologists they know how its done,
incremental, its Fabian, very gradual with a big smile on there face.
And its been whistle-blown by umpteen people
Bacon, Skinner, Huxley, Orwell, Waltzer, (Etzonay?;#36;)
insiders are talking about it.
David R.
Hawkins puts it this way in his book Power vs Force he said: There
is no anti-depressant that will cure a depression that's spiritually
based, for the malaise doesn't originate from brain dysfunction,
but from an accurate response to the desecration of life.
The Orientalist Jacob Burckhardt says that: In history the way
of annihilation is invariably prepared by inward degeneration.
Your asking what do we do about all of this.
That is what we are going to be looking at.
But give them a chance Michael!
They know how to deal with your anxieties, the fear, and
the trauma they know your maxed out, they know your ready
to blow up, so there working overtime on it just give them
more time and more money and soon it will all be over.
Gruin says that: ...many patients enter therapy not in order to preserve their human
feelings, which they perceive as ''a hindrance,'' but to be liberate from them.
And every day we read the headlines its the same thing.
Ready to completely sedate us, its an old story...
It reminds me of the movie The Network: ...all necessities
provided, all anxieties tranquillized, all boredom amused...
You see they wouldn't be in business without us, we
rush into there arms like little red riding hoods.
I've explained many times before there's many times
to be eaten by a leviathan it can pursue you
and swallow you or it can sit there static and you
can swim of your own free will into its jaws.
That is what half of the human race is doing right now.
That's what the Global Village is.
I say that: The anxiety-haunted man depends upon the hand-rails provided by society.
He is the perfect citizen of the Global Village.
He happily exchanges his name for a number, and
eagerly exchanges his sovereignty for security.
Carl Gustav Jung said that: We have lost our superstitious fear of evil spirits
and things that go bump in the night, but, instead, are seized with terror
of people who, possessed by demons, perpetrate the frightful deeds think of
themselves not as ''supermen,'' does not alter the fact of their possession.
See their just happy to oblige, we scream out
for something they are going to hand it to us.
There power comes from our complicity.
The power-brokers don't relinquish their authority and don't
hesitate to misuse it because they are firmly convinced,
given what they have seen, that most people around them
would gladly take their place if given half a chance.
This is one of the reasons this is really true, I
mean yeah they convince themselves of this but the
have seen it, that you give a person a chance and
they become a tyrant, so they hold on to their power.
The people who where involved and the people who were
the architects of this last disaster the financial
disaster they're back in business again they don't
even have a conscious about what they have done.
Why?
Because they know well if somebody was sitting in my seat they would do the same thing.
That's as far as their conscious goes.
You cant talk to them.
So we look at briefly and summarise the anatomy of tyranny, the ingredients.
Five are important.
Hierarchy: That everything they do is this hierarchical model.
Not that hierarchy is not always necessarily negative
but it is if it is in the hands of pathological people.
The movement of Dehumanization.
The act of Control which is what?
You don't control your self I will.
I'll control you.
And then as I went into in the other presentations
our Identification with the object of our hate.
My God volumes could be written on this.
And ultimately total psychic Enslavement.
The parasite cannot live without the host.
Now by the way Hierarchy just as a side note.
Those that follow my work on Atlantis on the cataclysms and the destabilisations
that took place, hierarchy was needed at the aftermath of that.
That's when it started to be used to give the resemblance
of order to an incredibly disorganised existence.
Somewhere at about 13,000 years ago and perhaps
even before and its been carried over its a
prehistoric concept that's been carried over
from the past that's why its so unsustainable.
And don't forget that this identification and this control also extends to
them saying, we know you want to leave the cage, but we have a better idea...
We will give you a measure of our power.
How does that sound?
Don't leave the cage.
Stay within it but we will give you more stripes.
Most of go ''Yeah sounds good.''
Because true freedom my friends is...
No master above.
That anyone knows.
But no slave below.
That's the difficult part.
How many people are we making dependant on us?
How much tyrannising are we doing?
Its easy to say ''I don't like being whipped by that ***,'' ''Oh
I hate the Illuminati, I hate the big boss, I hate those boss hogs.
I cant wait until there all out of power.''
But that leaves you.
Who is living in your shadow?
No true freedom is no master above by all means, but also no slave below, no dependant.
That's why its a more subtle thing like we said in the
beginning then just simply waving placards you see.
And we're going to get into this in Age of Manipulation 3 when
we come back to look at this particular thing in another way.
Who is it that we are making dependant on us and who is making us dependant on them.
In Psychic Vampirism we will again examining this whole concept of evil
with yet another lens, another set of focus more intimate, more personal.
The many ways that we enslave others and are enslaved.
As I said it is a very complex area.
Now these various forms of anxiety that I spoke about and the adversaries that we
have both inner and outer also breed two modes of escape that we need to contemplate.
I alluded to it a little, just very briefly a few minutes ago one is the
withdrawal syndrome of the schizophrenic remember the chronic introversion.
I cant handle this any more I don't want to know.
And you just literally shut the door of your mind
and your senses to the world K-PAX, you know?
One Flew Over The Cuckoos Nest kind of syndrome.
Or there's the opposite side of that the extreme hyper-manic extroversion and the
immersion into the mass which is effectively mania and neuroses of all descriptions.
And we will be going into that as well, looking at many of these syndromes.
Three I can only list here...
Withdrawal that's a schizoid personality.
The Collapse the personal that just gives up and
just collapses that's Big brother, control them.
They know that as a Oral Character.
Interesting character there.
But by far the interesting one.
Its the being that has committed themselves entirely to the pseudo self.
In pathological ways that most of us couldn't fathom.
There the psychopathic personality who very
much want other people to be dependant on them.
Who very much want those stripes and would do
anything to get them and want power over you.
You need to be worrying about them a hell of allot more then what
you need to be carrying about what's up in the corridors of power.
They are those types of beings but in the world that we are heading into the
psychopath, the socio-path, the pretender, the psychic vampire is loose.
More of them are going to be coming out of the wood
works its going to be like the night of the zombies.
Don't think I'm kidding.
Ayn Rand says that: For the rational, psychologically healthy man, the
desire for pleasure is the desire to celebrate his control over reality.
(Right?
Beingness) For the neurotic, the desire for pleasure is the desire to escape reality.
We all know how hard it is to break a pleasure habit.
Rand's prodigy Nathaniel Branden says that: One of
the hall marks of the man who lacks self-esteem...
is the fact that most of his pleasures of escape from the two pursuers whom
he has betrayed and from whom there is no escape: reality and his own mind.
Again alluding to syndromes that arise and the legitimate anxiety that comes about when
you set up this dynamic within your self or are influenced to do so by other people.
Probably one of the greatest experts on neurosis by far was
Karren Horney in one of her monumental books she says:
There is scarcely any neurosis in which the tendency
to get rid of the self does not appear in direct form.
It may appear in fantasies of leaving home and
becoming a derelict or of losing ones identity...
The tendency is present in wishes to be hypnotized, in an
inclination toward mysticism, in feelings of unreality...
(right check this out) ...in an inordinate need for
sleep, in the lure of sickness, insanity, death...
in masochistic fantasies the common denominator is
a feeling of being putty in the master's hands,
of being devoid of will, of all power, of being
absolutely subjected to another's domination.
Does any of this make any sense?
Putty in the masters hands, hypnotism.
We are master eschatologists we make Houdini look like he is on the dole.
How do we do it?
Take a wild guess, 9 to 5 evasion and escape.
I know its a rat race and I'm going to be the best
rat I'm going to be the fastest rat, the ugliest.
That's how I get my high, I'm going to get my high.
Affluence, there's nothing wrong with it apart when it becomes obsessive as we
know with these creatures these incredibly iffy *** solar cult worshipping...
The normal escapes we know about the alcohol
and the drugs partly turning off is it not?
Partly tuning out.
Or the more official version.
I don't take the elicit drugs but I take the medications my doctor hands me.
That will do the trick.
Jean Killborn says: Addiction is the number one health problem in America today.
Many people feel that addiction is at the root of other problems, such
as crime, poverty, divorce, child abuse, and other forms of violence.
Others argue that it is these problems that lead to addiction.
Another classic one.
The all-father the all-solve.
I divorce myself into the Mitwelt into the Umwelt, to the God behind the clouds and his
representatives there's always some one, there's always some Zeus with his thunderbolt.
But the religion is as you know the double headed eagle right?
We have been tenderised, remember that serfdom that's coming that Global Village?
The technicians, the geneticists, the builders
of the Global Village these Politician types
they are just taking the Masonic trial over from the guy that's passing the baton on.
For centuries we have been tenderised for this
collectivism and this globalism by religion.
Now they get tired or it gets kind of out of date and they hand the
baton over to there cronies, there all allies there all Greek Mysteria.
And also what does all this entail?
We go to religion often very meaningfully remember
we have tragedy in our life we reach out.
Originally the goal of the priest was to comfort us, Sorge, Her, Quere (?
$) the very word Quere meant ''care'' to remind you of the higher
meaning of life they where there ostensibly to do that but now there not that.
We reach out to these people to get that positive
sucker that we need to get those explanations.
Do you know what its called?
Strangling yourself in the webs that they created in an attempt to make your self free.
That's how clever and cunning they are.
They know your going to want to be free, they know that life is difficult, they know
there's lots of challenges and they know that
your imperial self is screaming to be free.
But they have designed this web, its fascinating to study, they have designed
it so that you strangle yourselves in your very attempts to be free from it.
By running to these religious people who just lead you on a
wild guise chase and the New Age Movement nine times out
of ten its the same story following the tiger into the long
grass, fighting them with the weapons they have handed us.
Theodore Reich says: To the primitive mind evil comes from outside.
Famine, death, and illness are the result of some malicious sorcerer or demon.
(That's the other trick isn't it?
All my problems are you, you are the creator of
them, I hold no responsibility) The world is full
of evil demons and the gods have to be propitiated
since they too want to harm poor human beings.
Erich From says: Just as the deity is conceived as omnipotent and
omniscient, man is conceived as being powerless and insignificant.
Only as he can gain grace or help from the deity
by complete surrender can he feel strength.
Submission to a powerful authority is one of the avenues by which
man escapes from his feelings of aloneness and limitation.
In the act of surrender he loses his independence
and integrity as an individual but he gains the
feeling of being protected by an awe-inspiring
power of which, as it were, he becomes a part.
Just the man.
Mikhail Bakunin the founder of anarchinism said that: The first revolt
is against the supreme tyranny of theology, of the phantom of God.
As long as we have a master in heaven, we will be slaves on earth.
But it doesn't need to be fundamentalism the world is wall to wall with
this collectivism posing under the guise of Theology and loss of self hood.
Its even in other forms as I said in the New Age movement.
Nice words, wrong tongue.
And anyway what is this spring cleaning malarkey, you think that
this jive and just a little spring cleaning is all that's required?
A little hypnotism?
No way.
This is one seasoned world stuff.
We have to go to the roots of the problem, this is
Pluto, nothing else will do nothing else will work.
None of this Svengali topical stuff is going to work.
The others?
What do we do to escape it?
The inauthentic forms of rebellion which I've spoken of
before which is just the flip side of a kind of conformity.
Just because your jaded with dissatisfaction, the world didn't accept you...
It doesn't mean that you are an authentic being that worked it all out.
Talk about rebellion we've got plenty of rebellion...
We've got the Chic metro sexy Bono version that works.
They wheel them out, wheel them out, wheel them out
we know there getting a bit anxious we know they
want to throw stones and stuff there getting out
of control, you know, write a beginners guide.
Rebellion for Dummies.
And they have there peoples champions and it
works remember that Charlie Chaplin movie he
runs down the road a red flag fell at the back
of a truck but it was just a stone masons
truck and his running down the road waving it
and all the people poor out, thinking that
he is the leader of communism and they all run behind him as he runs down the road.
Every time I see these characters I think of that.
They are the Vickers and High priests of the Global Village.
They're the pied pipers.
We subscribe to the latest national fantasy we have
a consensus trance we don't have individuality we
believe there crap about the perfect society and
goodness and equality and this concept of oneness.
I asked the question because they keep promising us freedom and everything.
Do we really want freedom?
As I alluded to earlier or really is what we want freedom from freedom.
See I'm not really personally convinced we want
freedom I've not seen enough evidence for it.
Changing chains of Iron for chains of Gold yes
that I have seen, changing an un-comfortably
numb for oh well I'd like to be comfortably numb, that I have been seeing plenty of.
But the true absolute striving for psychological freedom
that's in the mad, the insane and the outsiders the few.
Esther Vilar says: Freedom is the last thing he wants.
He functions...
according to the principle of pleasure in non freedom.
To be sentenced to life long freedom is a worse fate then life long slavery.
To put it another way: a man is always searching for someone or
something to enslave him, for only as a slave does he feel secure.
Leader above, leader below, boss above boss below, boss to the left, boss to the right.
Now I'm happy.
And the building has to be square, plenty of squares
please, plenty of cubicle's, I don't want to loose it.
Gustav Le Bon, he should know.
The man wrote the first book on collectivism ''The Crowd'' the first one to speak about
crowd mentality the heard mentality, he says:
The masses have never thirsted after truth...
Whoever can supply them with illusions is easily their master;
whoever attempts to destroy their illusions is always their victim.
Arno Gruin goes on to say: We would rather forgive the evil proliferating all
around us than the rebellion against it, which we mistake for the true evil.
Look how twisted we have become.
And the famous quote by Howard Zin always worth
repeating: Civil disobedience is not our problem.
Our problem is that numbers of people all over the
world have obeyed the dictates of the leaders of
their government and have gone to war, and millions
have been killed because of this obedience...
Our problem is that people are obedient all over the world in the
face of poverty and starvation and stupidity, and war, and cruelty.
Our problem is that people are obedient while the jails are full of petty
thieves, and all the while the grand thieves are running the country.
That's our problem.
This prediction of the end times obviously, this is a
prediction that the Hoppi have called (Coanskatsy?
$) for centuries the Vedic people knew
about it centuries ago, its not new either.
Now lets get out of our minds that there was going to be
any physical cataclysm I've been saying this from day one.
Its psychological cataclysm psychic life, ones own phase of ego is ending, there
is an extinction happening al-right but its not an extinction on a physical level.
There's something about the human mind its know as a projection, you project out-word
into the world what is really going on in the
psyche, so that the disasters that everyone
is predicting are not in any shape or form, not that psychology cant then ultimately
affect the matter we know that that happens,
but lets never fool ourselves for an instant.
What does it mean?
Existence itself becomes illegal.
Permission to think?
What happens if the General major goes ''No, who ever gave you
permission to think?'' That was bad enough, what happens if it
becomes ''permission to exist?'' That's where we are heading and
what happens if the answer ''No, not exist is the way you want.
The way we tell you, yeah maybe we will think about that.
Now: The War of Attrition concerns the gradual movement
toward the voluntary relinquishment of freedom.
Stage by stage, step by step, our masters remove the
''BEINGNESS'' from the human until humans are so collectivized
and alienated that their own existence is of secondary
importance than the existence of the hive in which they serve.
What this also means and we will look at it in a moment later
briefly is that the anxiety works for the Collectivists and
Globalists, the anxiety to be outside that consensus trance is
so deep is so intense that we *** on the doors to get beck in.
This is another thing their hoping for by the way, the anxiety of the
outsider eventually defeats him and he screams to be let back in.
Its basically psychic extinction and its been predicted by numerous.
Sigmund Freud had it down, somewhat obliquely and that's simply
because he was working on it, he described it as Thanatos.
Erich From his contemporary, the psychologist, rephrased it ''Necrophilia''
in the true sense of that word which is the love of death.
Freud used the Greek term Thanatos right.
They talked about this instinct of self negation, self mutilation, self ***.
Freud in his own words says: Starting from speculations on the beginning of life
and from biological parallels I drew the conclusion that, besides the instinct to
preserve living substance, there must exist another, contrary instinct seeking to
dissolve those units and to bring them back to their primeval, inorganic state.
That is to say, as well as Eros (life instinct) there was an instinct of Death.
This has been very controversial, its an ongoing dispute whether this exists or not.
Well I think it does.
And the man that did the home work to clarify the problem was the man on the left
Otto Rank who is one of the great existential psychologists that I mentioned earlier.
The founder of existential psychology is Ludwig Binswanger and
Otto Rank is one of the greatest spokes men of it and a brilliant
thinker who helped modernise and give some flesh to this concept
that Freud had left hanging somewhat this concept of Thanatos.
And do you know what Otto Rank said that Thanatos was, the death instinct was?
Nothing more then the very immersion into the
collective that we have been talking all about.
The loss of self-hood and the immersion of an individual in the mass.
That's the death instinct.
A radical way of looking at it and the right one because he
understood that this sick individual creates a sick society.
The toxic individual creates a toxic society.
And it is this trend or this immersion that is absolutely
the ingredient of the Posthuman era and the Global Village.
Plato said it 300BC or more: States are as men, they grow out of human characters.
Now what are the consequences of never facing the self?
We have been talking about that.
What are the consequences of it?
What if people refuse completely to any of this that we are talking about
and there immersed entirely in the lives of other people and the Umwelt and
water else Big Brother can design tomorrow on there conveyor belts and put
through there media networks right what's going to be the consequence?
Jerry Mander expresses it in one line: ...self
alienation has reached such a degree that
it can be experience its own destruction as an aesthetic pleasure of the first order.
That's what's coming.
Destruction hes accepting that's guaranteed, but what is he saying?
Like picking a scab, the next pleasure, the next
high is that restaurant at the end of the Universe.
Douglas Adams.
Come and have a front row seat, cocktails all
round while we watch the Universe explode.
It used to be fiction, if the poor man was alive he would be horror struck.
Its on its way!
But Ayn Rand reminds us: Psychologically, the choice
''to think or not'' is the choice 'to focus or not.''
Existentially, the choice ''to focus or not'' is the choice to be conscious or not.
Metaphysically, the choice ''to be conscious or not'' is the choice of life or death.
So it is destruction we are talking about.
The fundamental pylons, you know, are being removed gradually in the night, nibbled
at, by some very cunning serpentine beings who understand allot about this.
What was Freud talking about, what was Rand saying there talking
about the connection between physical and psychic energy.
They are aware you see of this intimate connection
like the shaman of old where, the ancients where
of the intimate connections between the micro and
the macrocosm, or the Eigenwelt and the Mitwelt.
There's connection, psychic connections between them, and if
we don't know what they are, you can better believe they do.
The masters know all about those connections.
Ans as we said before ignorance is there key, they depend on us not knowing.
There's a hell of allot changes if we do know if we do start finding out.
Steve Biko South African activist beaten to
death in a cell, do you think he didnt know?
He said himself: The most powerful tool in the hand
of the oppressor is the mind of the oppressed.
If you dont occupy the white squares they will.
Because ignorance is the key.
And the Illuminati so called, the Atonists, the dividers,
the Davids, Communitarians whatever you want to call
them, these people are born from the womb of our own
ignorance, that is the womb of our own anxiety and ***.
Ignorance is the mother of all evil says the Gospel of Philip.
Ignorance is the mother of all evil.
The wise inherit honour, but fools get disgrace.
Proverbs.
Better to be unborn then untaught said Plato.
For ignorance is the root of all misfortune.
Ignorance is the root of all misfortune.
Aristotle said that: The educated differ from the
uneducated, as much as the living from the dead.
So you might as well be dead to then to be uneducated to
these men who understood the consequences of not knowing.
We talk about what ways of life and what ways of seeing might be extinct, look
at the schooling alone just a study of that would horrify us, as we all know it.
Kids of today even worse.
These critical abilities, the judgement skill, the
rational, the reason itself is under direct attack.
It is indeed a war on consciousness.
But ladies and gentlemen its worse than that.
It is a war on consciousness in which we act as double agents against ourselves.
You would think it was bad enough when I said about strangling
ourselves in the webs in our attempts to be free, it is worse.
We are agents.
Can you imagine fifth colonists, agent provocateurs,
privates in the army in the war against ourselves.
How cunning, how devilish can a thing be, that's why to undo this knot is
equally challenging, equally difficult in its own way, subtle lets say.
If you think that's crafty recruiting by God you right it is.
That's why they have the power they do.
Do you want to take that power away?
I think everybody in this room wants to take there power away.
Well lets do it, you have to do it through
intelligence and understanding of what they know.
Ultimately it isn't that much but it is its own study, its own discovery.
We are now helped of course, on a lighter note,
that we are in this 2012 age of revealing.
Its an age of answers.
Not the same as a forefathers have.
There's reasons why its still going.
I know allot of us lament, why isn't this taking place, what's going on
why have people never done it before, how come they got so much power?
Time, the movement of history, very important...
This is a unique period in Earth history its
time for great strides because of two things.
The information that we are sharing now, the information about
this anatomy of tyranny and the means of transmission obviously.
Its a no brain-er.
But those are unique, our forefathers probably didn't have either,
in fact the only guys that had the knowledge where shivering
in some garret, or like Giordano Bruno ready to be taken down
to the Vatican square and put a bloody nail through his tongue.
Those where the ones who where in the know.
And the list goes on, Ezra Pound and the list goes on.
Not only physically assassinated but even professionally assassinated.
The age of answers means it is the time to ask
the right questions, any idiot can do that...
Its way more than that.
Its having the guts to accept the answers.
Because any true answer will change you in fundamental ways it will, otherwise
what's the point of pursuing it you might as well go and do something else.
You must also love knowledge.
Not just want to gain it.
They are two totally different realities.
You must want the answers at any cost.
Not just to fill a void.
Or again slave below I'm smarter than you because
you have a relationship with the knowledge.
And fundamentally and more importantly you must have zero tolerance for the lie.
It all hinges on that one as we will see as we go through.
Vernon Howard the American philosopher put it
so succinctly when he is talking about answers
and solutions he says that: Human sickness is
so severe that few can bare to look at it...
but those who do will become well.
So the guts to accept the answers its very needed.
And: Amid the cacophony of the world, the important
questions of Being go unheard and unasked.
So unanswered, well we have to ask those questions.
Krishnamurti said: Until the false is seen as false the truth is not.
What was that Conan Doyle Sherlock Holmes thing...
It is by the pain stacking elimination of the untrue that one comes upon the truth.
The painstaking elimination of what is untrue is what reveals the truth.
That's is what we are doing.
Its different then having opinions and believing other people.
In the Atlantis book I went deep into the past, people say ''oh
your into ancient history Michael in your book on Atlantis.''
Not really I'm interested in now, I'm interested in what I saw
now, I'm interested in the evil that I see in life today.
By being interested in that, yes though that is a secondary interest.
And then became an obsessive interest because I found the roots of all
of this Matrix of control in the ancient times in the primal trauma.
We don't have time to go into in this talk I've done it in other talks.
We will touch on it in important ways though, I
just want to make you understand this though...
Think of the cataclysms of passion dale, think a tsunami, think of trench warfare,
think of hurricanes and all sorts of genocides, think of breaking up with a girl
friend, and maximise those traumas hundreds of times, hundreds of times, its hard
to even find even a metaphor to describe it, what it was like for our ancestors.
This shake up.
Because even if you don't buy into my theory of the genetic
manipulation that's a bit hard to handle for people because
that was a source of the trauma as well by the way, you
cannot now deny that there was the physical cataclysms.
It has been proven by the scientists, my Atlantis page on the forum
will inform any sceptic of the latest up to date headline report
confirming completely not only the location of Atlantis itself but
all the cataclysms of a physical nature and the after affects.
Nobody asks what would that do to the psychology of man.
Peering at the rocks and the geological formations and how it split the continents.
Hoot, bored to tears I would be.
I'm interested in that, we weren't sitting in
there armchair just watching it on the screen.
They where living an absolute Armageddon billions of animals dead.
Unbelievable you read the legends.
What did that do to there consciousness?
And subsequently as I found out it did so much damage that the
architecture of the power that we have today is based on it and co-opted.
Theodore Reik the psychologist writes that: ...Joseph Feldmann
comes thus to the conclusion that at the foundations of
those oldest traditions there must have been some historical
event that left deep traces in the memory of all people.
R.A. Schwaler de Lubicz the great Egyptologist said that: Man is perfect
at his origin, a divine being who has degenerated into what we are.
Gerald Massey he said that: Primitive man was not a hundredth part so likely
to be the victim of hallucinations or diseased subjectivity as a modern man.
What does this have to do with the anatomy of tyranny more specifically?
Because we don't remember it.
The Architect of Control know all about this,
they know the history they know what happened.
Don't you think that just like the Nazis sent out there anthropologist and geologists
to take the skull sizes of every pygmy they could find, these people do business...
Well don't you think the higher powers then them have a thorough understanding,
don't you think there volts are filled with all the relics to this very day.
They know what we don't know.
They know we don't know.
They know we have the historical amnesia and that is what they are hoping for.
That is what they have used.
They cash in on it.
But I don't know if I have mentioned it clearly enough in the Atlantis
book or maybe I did but it certainly need to be mentioned now.
You may junk the memory of something even a that may happen
in your daily life, you know, your personal life you may junk
the memory, repress it, dissociate it whatever, you may do that
but you cant change the fact that it has an affect on you.
Right, the wound is still there, you can forget about
it but doing this you cannot change its affect on you.
The affect has already happened on you.
Schizophrenia ''shattered mind'' (from the Greek ***, ''to
divide'' or to ''split'') We are schizophrenic people in many
ways, genetically and also mentally because we have created a
barrier between ourselves and the memory of what happened.
What arose from that?
The ego.
The barrier is policed by the ego.
This incredible thing, this ghost, I have described it
as the ''Ghost that arose from the grave of the self.''
A thing that loves disorder.
Loves troubleshooting the disorder.
Loves manufacturing the problems and chaos to stay in charge.
It actually goes around creating allot of the
chaos that we see psychologically speaking.
This trauma happened a short time ago, historically speaking it was a short time
ago so we, remember the age of answers 2012, we are still very young in this.
This transition period of 2012 that we are going through
is one of the rites of passage of an awakening certainly,
yes, or more shaking up as well though, because we are
still in the very early stages of this original trauma.
We are babes in history.
And our mental development the healing has to
continue, and one can be optimistic and say
it will go well but the architects of control are there to prevent it from going well.
Carl Jung: Inasmuch as the ego is only the cent-rum of my field of consciousness, it
is
not identical to the totality of my psyche,
being merely a complex among other complexes.
Hence I discriminate between the ego and the Self,
since the ego is only the subject of my consciousness,
while the Self is the subject of my totality:
hence it also includes the unconscious psyche.
In this sense the Self would be an (ideal) factor which embraces and includes the ego.
Right, so the ego is here, and the true self encompasses it, embraces it.
Backing up what I am talking about the prehistoric trauma.
Gregg D. Jackobs In the Origins of consciousness in the Breakdown of the
Bicameral Mind, Julian Jaynes argued that self-consciousness
(Subjectivity right) emerged even more recently - at the
time of the Bronze Age, some five thousand years ago.
According to Jaynes, there was no sense of 'I'' before this period.
It was their first experience of the thinking
mind's internal monologue, Jaynes speculates,
that ancient peoples attributed to hearing the
voice of god, or being addressed by spirits.
In other words he's talking about the creation of the ego.
It hasn't been there forever, it is very recent the kind of consciousness we have now.
But what about that other ancestral consciousness where's that?
That is the imperial Self that's still functioning back there.
Its the ancestral voice or, as we will talk later on, the imagination.
Which is another word for it.
Theodore Reik says: William James has described
the puzzling phenomena of self-observation
(remember we where talking about that in the
beginning) in the words, ''The I observes the Me.''
It is obvious that the precondition for such a phenomenon - observation of
one's own mental and emotional processes - must be a split within the ego.
This split makes psychology possible.
In fact, this split makes psychology necessary.
If the ego were undivided, it could not observe itself.
It would have no need to observe itself.
Another manifestation of this very split we are talking about is duality.
We are divided we are split, our way of seeing is divided
fragmented so everything we see in our creation is the same.
Life is filled with them.
You and me...
We should all be familiar with them.
Then after the damage has been done...
Well we gotta explain it.
And another preposterous mysterium is created to explain the first mysterium.
All of them irrational.
Well Jung is saying it: I am not denying that great gains
have been resulted from the evolution of civilised society.
But these gains have been made at the price of enormous
losses, whose extent we have scarcely begun to estimate.
And that is where the master slave comes in.
Because this ancient trauma weakens our psychic
constitution we are divided within we are weak
psychologically that's why we want a master above
us slaves below us and bosses on all sides.
And the masters are only too happy to oblige.
Glenn Pardon says: We have internalised our masters,
which is a well-known psychological response to trauma.
When faced with overwhelming terror, the human mind splits,
with part of itself modelling itself after the oppressor.
This is an act of appeasement.
''Look'' the mind says in effect.
''I am like you, so do not harm me.''
Otherwise known as the identification with object of ones hate.
Putty in the masters hands, remember that?
Its infantile, infantilism is what it is.
Jung says: Consciousness is a very recent acquisition of
nature, and it is still in an ''experimental state.''
It is frail, menaced by specific dangers, and easily injured.
As anthropologists have noted, one of the most common mental derangements
that occur among primitive people is what they call ''the loss of a soul.''
The loss of self, nothing more than that.
Jung goes on to say: Modern man does not
understand how much his ''rationalism''...(Right
that's this egoism) has put him at the mercy of
the psychic ''underworld.''(In other words his
division has huge consequences) He has freed
himself from ''superstition'' (or so he believes),
but in the process he has lost his spiritual values to a positively dangerous degree.
His moral and spiritual tradition has disintegrated and he is now paying
the price for this break-up in worldwide disorientation and dissociation.
Who do you think sits back going '' I love it'' egging it on.
David Watson in The Pathology of Civilisation says: We reproduce catastrophe because
we ourselves are traumatized - both as a species and individually, beginning at birth.
(See he only takes it back to physical birth, they don't
understand this concept of prehistoric physical and
genetic trauma) Because we are wounded, we have put up
psychic defences against reality and have become so
cut off from direct participation in the multidimensional
wilderness in which we are embedded that all we
can do is to navigate our way cautiously through a
humanly designed day-to-day substitute world of symbols.
Now we will take a brake and came back after a half an hour.
The next section will be on Collectivism so that we unpack
some of these ingredients of tyranny a little bit better.
Ladies and gentleman lets come back in about half an hour.