Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
.....we were flirting on Facebook for months,
before I realised it was my mother.
Interesting.
Hi, I am Hugh Jass,
and today I am joined by feminist author,
Mary Hinge. Hello, Mary, and welcome.
Hello, Hugh, and thank you.
Today you want to talk about how children in England are to be taught about domestic
violence
from the age of five,
but you must have something to plug first,
let's hear it.
Yes, Hugh, I have released a new perfume.
I thought I smelt something,
I assumed you had stood in dog ***.
No, Hugh,
that's my new perfume, it takes a bit of getting used to.
I'll say.
What is it called? It's called "***",
the fragrance for women who want to celebrate their independence.
It's making my eyes water.
Okay, Mary,
let's begin with today's topic,
domestic violence lessons in school,
please explain a little about it.
Certainly. Starting from 2011, schools in England will teach children
from the age of five about domestic violence in adults relationships.
Boys will be taught
that it is wrong to hit girls, and the children will learn what signs to look out for,
so they know
if daddy is abusing mummy.
Is this just England,
or the entire United Kingdom?
Just England.
This has the disgusting stench of feminism all over it.
It sure does.
This is the result of an education system
that is infested with rabid feminists, and they are not as concerned about education,
as they are about indoctrination.
It's a dream come true for feminism.
How so?
They get to demonise males before they even learn how to read or write.
Please explain how males are demonised
by these domestic violence lessons.
Certainly. Boys will be taught
that it's wrong to hit girls, whereas girls will not be taught
that it's wrong to hit boys.
This has many negative results for young boys,
for a start,
they will assume that hitting girls is something that all boys end up doing,
since hey have to be taught not to do it.
Being taken aside at five years old
and being taught not to do something bad,
can make boys think they are born bad,
and are somehow in need of correcting, or adjustment,
in order to be a good person.
It also instills a horrible attitude
in all the girls around them, who will assume their violence towards boys is just a bit of fun,
since it isn't taken as seriously.
Why completely dismiss male victims of domestic violence,
shouldn't the children learn about them too?
Yes, but they won't so long as feminists run the show.
They justify dismissing male victims
because some ***, somewhere,
at some point,
pulled some statistics out their ***
that said women suffer domestic violence more than men, so they ignore the minority who suffer,
in favour of the majority, whereas if they cared about educating children,
they would include all victims, but as I said,
feminists don't do education, they do indoctrination.
True that.
Do people protest against this?
Yes, but in true feminist style,
they just hide behind the cause, so if someone protests,
they just accuse them of being against the idea of fighting domestic violence,
when in fact they are just against the idea of boys being demonised.
What other negative outcomes are there?
Brain dead women, like the ones you get on inane daytime drivel, like Loose Women, will use this
as a way of proving females are better than males.
They will sink so low,
they will say that girls must be better,
because they don't have to be taught
not to hit people,
even though they know boys also don't need to be taught this,
they will still use it as a way to elevate women above men, in their usual pitiful manner.
What a disgusting bunch of witches.
Why specifically domestic violence,
as opposed to violence in general?
Because it affects women more than men, by a very small margin,
whereas violence in general affects men more than women, by a very big margin.
That's why it's so obvious that it is totally controlled by rabid feminists.
If the aim was to teach children about domestic violence,
they wouldn't ignore victims based on gender, but they do,
so children will be taught
that only women can be victims of domestic violence,
which in turn
teaches boys to suffer in silence if they are ever in an abusive relationship
when they are adults, since
their suffering isn't deemed worthy of mentioning by the English education system.
It also teaches children whose fathers are victims, that their suffering is irrelevant,
which in turn teaches children that women's concerns are more important than men's, and that
mummy is more important than daddy.
Any other negative outcomes?
You bet. Children will become afraid of their fathers, uncles,
grandfathers, and other male relatives, as they will have been indoctrinated into thinking
that they are abusive to women,
due to being male.
Are the parents affected by this?
Yes, they will no longer be able to have a pretend fight, or other general horseplay in front
of their kids,
without having to explain to their child that it's just a bit of fun, as the five-year-old
child will be so indoctrinated with feminist hate, that they could easily mistake adult
horseplay as abuse.
That's just terrible.
Will parents in England just allow their sons to be demonised in this way?
Mothers definitely will,
whereas most fathers will probably say something about it,
maybe even take their sons aside
and teach them the truth.
How come you are so sure
that mothers will just allow their sons to be demonised?
Because women are strange creatures, allow me to sum it up very simply by saying, a woman
would stand up for a girl she doesn't even know,
before she would stand up for her own son,
for example,
if it was suggested
that girls be taught at the age of five,
not to falsely accuse men of ***,
which they do in overwhelming numbers,
or not to abuse children,
which they do far more than men,
or not to *** their own children,
which they do far more than fathers, all of which would be as justifiable to teach as teaching
about domestic violence,
if this happened, most women would take to the streets
with pitchforks and flaming torches,
demanding that other people's daughters don't get demonised in such a way, yet when it's
their own sons being demonised,
they are as quiet as a church mouse on Tuesday.
That is very true.
Is there any way this could backfire on feminists?
Absolutely,
as I touched on earlier,
parents could take their children aside and teach them the truth,
which would be a nightmare for feminists, as the truth shows women are just as guilty at
initiating domestic violence as men.
The worst thing for feminists, would be if intelligent mothers got up off their farters
and actually bothered to show for once that they cared about their sons welfare, by protesting
against this atrocious demonising of their sons, by confronting teachers with facts,
by standing outside school gates with placards,
showing how disgusted they are at the treatment of their sons, by writing to their local politician
and demanding a change, or to
put it another way, do exactly what they would do if it was their daughters being demonised.
Do you think intelligent mothers will protest?
Not a chance.
Most women have an ingrained hatred for men,
this will ensure that they get pleasure out of seeing their sons demonised at five years old,
and while boys in other countries will learn how to read, write,
and do mathematics, their sons will be learning about how terrible they are, and how they need
to change in order for anyone to love them.
Absolutely monstrous.
Who teaches the teachers about domestic violence?
Feminist experts on domestic violence, they will ensure
that teachers only know about female victims, and all the data the teachers get
will relate to female victims,
and male perpetrators.
In other words, the teachers will be indoctrinated with *** first,
before they then pass the same *** onto children, and pass it off as fact.
So we have reached a point where feminism has such a stranglehold on women,
that they will just sit around
and allow their sons to be taught
that they are bad because they are male?
Yes, women are the key to stopping this, if only they would show that they cared as much
about their own sons, as they do about other people's daughters,
then this would be stopped immediately,
as the government in England are absolutely ***-scared of losing the women's vote.
All it takes is a few strong mothers who actually care, and the whole plan would crumble.
The government would bend over backwards
to please the female electorate,
which is why they have decided to demonise five-year-old boys in the first place, as
they assume that's what women want, since feminists have told them that's what women want,
and because most women just sit with their thumb up their *** while their sons are demonised,
giving the impression that they don't mind if their sons are taught that they are
the spawn of Satan.
Horrendous.
What will it take to make mothers get off their shitters and protest against this?
A few things could trigger a response,
like their daughter being afraid of her brother,
or their sons being victims of bullying by girls,
since girls are taught
that their violence is not a serious matter.
The one thing
that would encourage mothers to take a stand, is if a brave teacher
actually taught the truth about domestic violence,
resulting in children learning that mummy
can be just as violent as daddy,
if that happens,
then mothers will protest
as girls will also be demonised,
and they care more about the welfare of five-year-old girls than they do about the
welfare of five-year-old boys, even the ones they have nurtured.
Let's hope something triggers a response soon,
this is a disaster waiting to happen.
It sure is.
Well, Mary,
you have taught me a lot today, it's been very interesting, thank you for your time.
No problem, Hugh.
It's time to go,
but before we do,
I have a joke for Mary,
what do you call a feminist with two brain cells?
I don't know.
Pregnant.
Until next time, goodbye.