Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
I think one of the things that I’ve appreciated now, at my ninth month anniversary,
compared to when I walked in the door, is the importance of partnership with our sister
agencies.
That is absolutely crucial in terms of coming together around common problems of interest--
the study of crime and the study of the criminal justice system--and also as we work together in
the era of shrinking resources. Partnerships are going to be vital as we move forward to be able
to be more efficient, to consolidate our work, and to inform each other about our work.
Let me give you a couple of examples. With respect to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, it makes
the most sense for the statistical systems to be informed by research, and as those statistical
systems get developed, those statistical systems then can be used by the research community.
And through the use of those statistical systems, you not only generate evidence to link to
policy and practice, but you also are able to identify gaps in those very statistical systems
that then have to be adapted for further study and so forth. And so it’s a synergy between the
statistical systems on the one hand and the research and the evaluation on the other hand,
and that makes for much more efficiencies across the board.
At the same time, there are things going on in the field that are innovative, where there’s no
research evidence available about whether or not they work, they don’t work, they partially
work, what have you. And that’s an opportunity for the Bureau of Justice Assistance and NIJ to
partner together to identify promising, innovative programs and then to construct demonstrated
field experiments to evaluate their effectiveness across multiple sites.
Well, another idea that we had and we were able to just launch this last week was a seminar
series, a joint seminar series between the Bureau of Justice Statistics and the National
Institute of Justice. And so we had our first speaker, who was from the Bureau of Justice, a
visiting fellow, last week. She talked about her work on chronic victimization. We had a great
turnout of both BJS staff and NIJ staff and through the Q&A, we were able to develop clear
questions about how we could improve statistical systems--to add items to particular ongoing
surveys, or, in fact, to create new surveys--and also how we could use some of our ongoing
research and evaluation to inform what is an extremely important topic for the field--chronic
repeat victimization.
The idea of somebody being victimized multiple times is of interest on a variety of fronts. It’s
of interest to police agencies as a way of reducing victimization because in the same way that
we know that crime is concentrated amongst certain individuals, the question is, when we look
at the crime problem, to what extent is chronic victimization also part of this concentrated crime
problem? We also know in areas like domestic violence there’s lots of evidence to suggest
that repeat victimization is common. We also know in a school context with respect to bullying,
repeat victimization is common, so the issue of repeat victimization cuts across several
important domains, and one of the things that we would like to do in conjunction with the Bureau of
Justice Statistics is identify better data on that very topic and also then to begin to do
research and evaluation of programs that are designed to reduce and prevent repeat
victimization.