Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
mit romney is doing something that i wrote about in a recent national
newspaper column which i do once a month which is the art of projection
projecting onto other something that you do fox news is graded this tech talking
about how biased others are when really foxnews incredibly biased this is the
epitome of that mit romney saying hey guys you gotta be careful
i'm i'm thinking brocco bomb a might live in debates because
he's he's kind of a liar this is what he said to george stephanopoulos this week
and um... it's it's pretty absurd here's the video that very very strange stuff
willis
in letters he started all that the setup president for farmers citizens with
you looking for
well uh... i think he's going to say a lot of things that your thing and uh...
you know i'm fine i'd be tempted to go back to that wonderful line by ronald
reagan there you go again but you can't you can't use of that's good news that
about you the other day pick democratic convention as another brother once said
there they go again andrea
did happen to see that but i think that's the challenge that i'll have in
the debate is that the president
uh... tends to uh... uh... actually say that uh... say things that are true and
uh... and and in attacking the his opponents i've looked at fire debates in
and then back at a case it's it's difficult to to say well am i going to
spend my time correcting things that are quite accurate now or my gonna spend my
time talking about the things i want to talk about in rectangle this if you
would you guys think it's a little more understand in a debate you answer
questions
and that should be the topic but as we know rear reunited
is the answer related to the the question do you guys think that this is
just kind of standard romney nonsense or is this romney already
laying the groundwork
for excusing why he doesn't do well in the debate side well what do you think
this that does is their strategy behind mister is it just
typical romney nonsense
their strategy behind it and uh... i don't think he's a
really setting himself up but uh...
for the debate on the i think that's kind of a possible to do
but i mean it any opportunity you get the slam your opponent
you take it and calling him a liar
is uh... is a pretty good what do you think that i mean particularly good mit
romney is in the liar easy easy ride it out
everything from social issues
the fiscal issues to where he's work and when he worked in all these different
things
at what what do you how do you interpret this to the time
i think he's trying to na kya lee himself against the media spin that's
gonna go on after the debate
and sense i think he can objectively anticipated that it's been a favor obama
in the fact checking announces he's gonna try to preempt that by just saying
that even that is off
it's just alive if not in the details in the general broad picture that is being
yet that may be the case and of course as we know
the republican national convention really giving those fact checkers a lot
of work whereas as we saw on the democratic side
uh... sticking took truth in reality a lot more load
truth in reality or arguably the best things uh... if if you're into truth in
reality
nate is not your can't happen here
if you are incorrect backbase candidacy
iran is not the guy one of the voting for him particularly not all right