Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
This is a response to PPSimmons’ video: “The Living Dinosaur RUNS from debate offer
from PPSIMMONS! Scared?... or unable to defend himself!”
As I’ve mentioned elsewhere I’ve become a little disillusioned with the YouTube atheism
scene of late and have been questioning the value of the considerable time and effort
expended in the production of my videos. In the midst of my ennui, however, I received
a curt message from the PPSimmons channel inviting me to debate that shining paragon
of Christian virtue, ShockofGod. Upon declining this attractive opportunity
for a number of reasons – reasons that should be immediately obvious to those whose intellects
haven’t been dulled by the anoxic conditions brains tend to encounter when the heads harboring
them spend inordinate amounts of time lodged inside digestive tracts – my would-be adversaries
somewhat predictably took the opportunity to claim victory as if they’d won first
prize at a witch-burning contest. Unfortunately, it seems that while they were
searching for a white feather as enthusiastically as a preacher rummaging through a bucket of
***, they neglected to pay attention to the video they were making to label me as a coward.
As a result they’ve afforded me a fine opportunity to make what might be my last hurrah, so with
that said let’s take a look at what they had to say and whether I’ve managed to save
the best ‘til last. “Hello everyone. Mike Shoesmith here.”
Now, I must apologize here, because when I made Holy Hallucinations 30 I was unaware
of your real name and so christened you a respectful sobriquet of my own concoction.
Unfortunately although I’m now a little wiser, it’s rather futile to lock the stable
door after the horse has bolted, and since I feel my little nickname is infinitely more
appropriate, for the purposes of this video I shall continue referring to you as Pisspants.
“As many of know we recently interviewd ‘ShockofGod’ – his name is Rich.”
Well I have to say “ditto” here and stick to my original and much more accurately descriptive
moniker of “Cockshite”. I must confess, though, to some amusement at the irony of
finding out his name is Richard, because he is without doubt one of the biggest dicks
on this website, if not the planet. “And a great guy. And a wonderful, powerful
man of God. Doing the…” Hey, steady on Pisspants. It’s obvious that
you’re surprisingly fond of your “special friend”, but this is a family channel and
I’m afraid that we’re not interested in hearing what or whom Cockshite is “doing”.
“… the exploits prophesied in the Bible. Reaching out to the atheist community, because
he was an atheist.” Yeah. Right. An atheist. I’m not sure if
you actually believe this, Pisspants, but considering how stupid past evidence indicates
you are it’s certainly not beyond the bounds of possibility. However, for people capable
of bridging a synapse occasionally, it’s quite obvious that Cockshite’s claim in
this regard is… well, a crock of ***. Because anyone who has even the vaguest inkling
of what atheism actually is wouldn’t even dream to ask his stunningly banal “accurate
and correct” question, because they would realize what a quite spectacular *** they
were making of themselves in doing so. “And - essentially - uuur… he’s a laborer
in the… in the arena of ideas.” [Extended laughter]. Aaaah. You crazy creationists,
Pisspants. You might be as dumb as Great Dane with his nose up Shih Tsu’s ***, but at
least you’re entertaining! Anyway, I’ll let you get on with your video while I wring
out my underpants. “Now TheLivingDinosaur has made videos about
PPSimmons. And we have asked… we… er… we have been asked, rather, to debate him.
To look at his videos and to refute them. So I did that. I went to his channel… er…
and I looked into some of his material. But it was so foul – so full of gratuitous foul
language that there was nothing useable there for me. I just couldn’t use any of it.”
I have to say Pisspants, that this clip bought to mind Lyndon Johnson’s immortal observation
vis-à-vis Gerald Ford, that is that he was so dumb he couldn't fart and chew gum at the
same time. And while I can’t be sure whether you managed to squeeze one off just then,
it certainly suggested that you’re so dumb that you can’t operate a computer and talk
that the same time. As a result you may notice yourself sounding unusually eloquent in parts
of this video, because I’ve taken the liberty to edit out the silences that punctuate your
abominably dreary monologue like respites in a particularly vicious case of amebic dysentery.
I did this because even my creative talents would be stretched to animate the copious
silences induced by the squealing and crunching of the stripped gears in your dilapidated
mind. Anyway, getting back to the point, I included
this clip because it’s particularly pertinent to something you say later and you can rest
assured that I’ll be inserting it rectally at the appropriate juncture. I’ll let you
know when to drop them and bend over Pisspants, but in the meantime allow me to throw in my
two cents with regard to what you said about my creative use of Anglo Saxon vernacular.
You see, call me cynical if you like, but your protestations as to your inability to
respond to my verbal rapings because of your delicate aural sensibilities is, unfortunately,
indistinguishable from the same inability being actuated by a tiny and shriveled brain
that’s simply incapable of responding to the refutations I’ve been regularly inserting
roughly into your and your Bible Buddies’ collective ani. The likelihood of this interpretation
is bolstered by the fact that even Ian Juby somehow managed to scrape together the acumen
to find a way to obviate my invective and respond to me, though it is of course entirely
possible that even this lies beyond your abilities because you’re even stupider that that Epsilon-minus,
lobotomized walrus. I have my suspicions as to which explanation is the closer reflection
of reality, and since you’re evidently not the sharpest nail in the cross I’ll give
you clue. It’s not yours, dipshit. “But I didn’t want to ignore the challenge.
So I said to… uh… Rich of ShockofGod, I said, ‘would you be willing to do that
with me as moderator – he’s pretty foul?’ I said. And then Rich said, “It’s not
a problem. We prerecord it, and then we bleep out all of his foul language.”
And here we go with the first reason I decided to decline your generous proposal, Pisspants.
Right from the outset you were already admitting that you intended to censor me. Now I realize
you were solely referring to my linguistic licentiousness in this case, but unfortunately
I have no way of knowing whether you’d restrict your bowdlerization to my irreverence rather
than my arguments. After all, even a drooling simpleton like you could use an audio processor
to turn a recording of me *** Cockshite viciously up the *** with his arguments into
one of him converting me to Christianity while persuading me to *** over a copy of “The
God Delusion”. And while I might be able mitigate this eventuality by putting up the
full recording on my channel, I’d be powerless to stop you from misleading the poor gullible
sheep you’re deceiving on yours, who are, I suspect the, primary target of this scheme.
Now, my guess is that you’d protest and claim that this was not your intent and that
even a perfidious little weasel like you wouldn’t dream of stooping so low. Sadly this would
necessitate me having to trust you, and since trust is a commodity that isn’t given away
freely and needs to be earned, this would pose a perplexing conundrum. Because based
on your prior behavior and that which I’ll be demonstrating here shortly, I’m afraid
that the balance of your and Cockshite’s account in this respect is further in the
red than the Greek economy. “So I sent, er, TheLivingDinosaur a message
– a private message.” And I’d like to point out the fact that
you were actually able to PM me, but that I couldn’t be afforded the same courtesy
as I’ve been blocked by you. Now, you’re going to give us your flaccid excuses as to
why you’ve done so later, and at that juncture I shall be administering them an industrial-strength
dose of *** and then using them to sodomize you as roughly as possible. In the meantime,
I’ll just point out that mine is the channel that allows all criticisms, no matter how
harsh, disagreeable or vile, while yours treats any dissenting comments, no matter how polite,
reasonable or levelheaded in the same way the Vatican treats evidence in a child abuse
investigation. “OK. We sent that out on the twenty-eighth
of December – today is the seventeenth – so nineteen days ago we sent this message…
so for nineteen days this is what we heard from him… [cricket chirping]. That’s a
cricket. I brought up a cricket on Youtube – somebody recorded it.”
OK, Pisspants. Remember when I mentioned that I’d be conducting a proctological procedure
on you with something you said earlier? Well, it’s time for your appointment. While you’re
dropping your strides and assuming the position I’ll take a moment to point out my amusement
that you felt it necessary not only here, but twice elsewhere in you video, to point
out what that sound was and what it meant. From this I can only assume that you and your
fellow PissPanters think that your subscribers are just as stupid as you are. So with that
said I think it’s time for me to get onto the point we’ve been waiting for, so I strongly
suggest, that you grit your teeth and brace yourself for re-entry.
Remember when you said earlier that you waited nineteen days for my response? Well you seemed
to think this was a big deal, because you mentioned it more than once in your video.
Remember this? “But no. He stewed about it for nineteen
days.” It seems that your fevered imagination was
working overtime on this one, Pisspants, but considering the kinds of things it’s convinced
you to believe in, I suppose that’s not too surprising. Unfortunately, it also seems
your severe cognitive dysfunction also rendered you unable to curtail your flights of fancy,
and didn’t even make you pause for thought before committing your hallucination to video.
You see, it may have escaped your notice, but your little missive happened to arrive
during the holiday season. This is particularly surprising because you claim to be a Christian
and so might have been expected to notice its proximity to your holy day. But apparently
you did not because it didn’t seem to occur to you that I might have been enjoying my
break with my family and may have not have been inclined to drop everything to answer
pointless messages from "a bunch of ***-weasels". Furthermore, it presumably also never occurred
to you that the first couple of weeks of the New Year might be a busy time catching up
on work and getting back into the school season, and that I, like many others, might just have
been both indisposed and disinclined to leap to the beck and call of a jumped up little
*** with delusions of his own importance. This oversight on your part may have come
about because, while I have a real job doing something that’s of actual use to society
and so can’t spare all my time to deal with *** like you, it appears that you’re
paid to do nothing but talk *** and lie to the gullible like a parasite sucking on society’s
scrotal sack and so can’t imagine what real work is.
So, Pisspants, it happens that I had a rather large backlog of PMs to attend to come mid-January,
and yours was hardly at the top of the list. In fact as it turned out, you were right at
the bottom, just after the gentleman inviting me to check out the video of his Kajagoogoo
cover and the one asking to watch an infomercial for a Miracle ***-Growth Peniciser.
But what’s most amusing here, Pisspants, is not that you jumped onto this point as
enthusiastically as a priest introducing himself to a freshman class of choirboys, but that
you were evidently oblivious to how poorly doing so served you. Because apparently you’re
unaware that my first rebuttal to a PPSimmons video was way back in Holy Hallucinations
8 which was released on July 28th, 2010. That’s exactly two-years-and five-months before you
finally got around to “responding” to me, which even a hypocritical, mother-***
speck of *** like you would have to admit is just a little longer than you were kept
waiting. So with that in mind, Pisspants, I think that
by your own reasoning, if I was indeed “stewing” for those nineteen days, you should be willing
to admit that you and the other mentally atrophied primitives at the PPSimmons channel have been
positively *** your pants continuously for the past twenty-nine months. Have you
ever considered doing a sponsorship deal with Tide, I wonder?
“And this was his response. Let’s scroll up. ‘Considering that you people and – blankety
blank – have proven that you’re not interested in debate by the way you run your channels,
you have some nerve. Rather than providing you any opportunity to gain some credibility
or dignity, I think I’ll stick to pwning the blank out of you, thanks.’”
I’m not going to play back our entire exchange here but will, for the record will be leaving
a link to it in the description. Instead I played just my initial response in order to
elaborate a little. You see, Pisspants, it’s a matter of record that you and Cockshite
are two of the most egregiously dishonest creationists fuckwits here on Youtube, and
considering the company you’re in, that’s saying something.
Both of you are known to block other users and censor comments at the drop of a hat,
to refuse video responses, and lie for your god as if he rewards shitbaggery with ***.
This kind of behavior tends to leave the impression that you’re not interested in any kind of
debate, but instead are intent on promoting yourselves and pushing your own agendas while
shielding your subscribers from ever discovering how often and how viciously they’ve be rammed
up your jacksies by countless able Youtubers in the past.
Thus when a pair of massive *** like you send a request to debate, it’s immediately
clear to anyone who isn’t suffering from your kind of neuro-fecal disability that a
discussion is the last thing you’re interested in. Instead a much more likely inference is
that your agenda is to take the opportunity of a biased debate format to lie like Kent
Hovind with a pencil in one hand and tax return in the other, and then to claim victory regardless
of what was said, safe in the knowledge that if your arses were handed to you on a plate
your subscribers would never know better. Thus it seemed to me that the safest response
was not to dignify your request with an affirmative, but instead to restrict myself to doing the
only thing that people like you most deserve, and that’s humiliating you as soundly as
I possibly can. Of course, when I declined your disingenuous offer I was more than aware
that you’d most likely grab the opportunity to accuse me of cowardice as eagerly as VenomFangX
snatching a dollar bill from a leukemia patient, but I also hoped that this might provide me
with some material with which to highlight your dishonesty. As you know, Pisspants, I’m
not a religious man, but if I were then your response would have convinced me beyond a
shadow of a doubt that my prayers had been answered.
“Now he says that we have the ability… the opportunity to gain some credibility.
However he has less than twenty thousand subscribers and only one-and-a-half million viewers. We
have twenty four thousand one hundred and forty-six subscribers, twenty-seven and a
half million views. So this would be a boon to him, not to us. Right? And Shock, he has
twenty-three thousand subscribers and almost as many views. So this would be a lift up
for him.” Well, Pisspants, I do have to admit that I
find the fact that a pair of mentally subnormal and morally bankrupt shitbags like you two
have more subscribers than I and many other rationalist channels just a little depressing,
and this certainly doesn’t help in alleviating my current video-making malaise.
But other than reminding me of the shabby state of the so-called community on this site,
I’m afraid the only thing this argument did was show that when it comes to the unforgiving
battlefield of ideas, you’ve turned up wearing just a diaper and swinging a rattle whilst
foolishly expecting to leave with your testicles and dignity intact.
That’s because, Pisspants, it seems that you’re unaware that sub count and total
video views are not the only metrics of channel success. The fact that realizing this would
only have taken a moment’s investigation and a just a tiny soupcon of thought suggests
that you’re either too lazy or uninterested to do the work to determine whether the thoughts
your brain is excreting have any merit, or that you lack the requisite number of functional
neurons to perform the necessary evaluations. If you had investigated further, you might
have realized how easy it would be for me to *** you brutally with your own malformed
thought, but since you didn’t, allow me to do the work for you. You see, it doesn’t
take a genius to discover that your stats are obscuring the bigger picture once you
notice that the average views on my videos are just a tad higher than those on yours.
In fact, with just a small amount of extra effort, you could have taken the 68 videos
on my channel and compared them to, say the last 68 malodorous offerings from yours, and
discovered that while my videos average a potent and virile 17,000 views each, yours
trail pathetically behind with a limp and flaccid 6400.
And if you think that’s bad, Pisspants, watch what happens when we look our medians.
Mine drops slightly to 16,000, indicating a fairly tight distribution around the mean,
while your drops like a preachers pants in a *** to just a hair over 1000. The
reason for this discrepancy rapidly becomes obvious after just the most perfunctory of
investigations. You see, the only thing inflating your views are your vile, repugnant and, frankly,
border-line treasonous videos against your own president. In fact, looking through your
videos by order of popularity it becomes clear that the primary reason your total views are
in the millions is because of your dishonorable and repulsive slanders against President Obama
and the hordes of racist metal defectives that they attract.
But when it comes to your anti-science and religious videos, Pisspants, it seems that
mine average about 16-times more views than yours. It doesn’t take a genius to work
out, why, of course, but since I realize that you’re a few standard deviations to the
left of average, I’ll give you a clue. In fact, I’ll also point out that this video
that I’m responding now has double the views of most of your regular offerings after I
pointed out its existence in the description of a recent shout-out I gave.
So when all’s said and done, Pisspants, it should now be quite clear who’d be the
true beneficiary of any publicity arising from such a debate. It wouldn’t have been
me, it would have been yourself and Cockshite, who’s channel stats are every bit as impotent
as yours. Now I suggest you pull up your diapers and pick up your balls while I play the next
clip. “If he could take on Shock and destroy him
in a debate… I would have moderated it, er, fairly…this… this would… there would…
there is no way for him to lose really - unless he can’t debate. Unless he just hides behind
his moniker, and his filthy language and his… his cartoony channel. And that’s essentially
what he’s doing here.” And here’s another problem with your offer
that you’re apparently oblivious to, Pisspants. I suppose you weren’t paying much attention
during the election, presumably because you’d already decided that nothing was going to
change your mind about not supporting a Kenyan nig-nog, but anyone who watched the presidential
race will understand that debates have nothing to do with finding out who has the stronger
position, but rather who has the most experience and can lie the most convincingly. And that
latter point would put me at a particularly disadvantage, because I-don't-lie. Not only
is this because, unlike you, I actually have some character, but also because one tends
not to have to when one has the facts on one's side. People like you and Cockshite, on the
other hand, who have the moral turpitude of Tea-Partyer walking past a breadline and no
facts whatsoever, have resort to spewing lies like a busted sewer line.
So it’s rather telling that you place so much weight on the debate format, Pisspants,
and seem to think that if I weren’t a good debater that this would somehow mean that
my position was invalid. I'm convinced that vermin like you prefer this format because
there’s little or no chance for your opponents to fact-check your ***, nor to demand
that you supply evidence of your ludicrous assertions. And that, of course, works perfectly
for underhanded fuckwits who have no facts to offer.
“The reason he was blocked – the reason he was kicked out, essentially, is because
he’s so foul. I mean, the kind of language he uses – we don’t… we don’t permit
people to come into our living rooms and sit down and use that kind of language in front
of us and our wives and children. And we treat our Youtube channel like we treat… like
it’s our home. So if you’re going to come in and disrespect us, be rude to us, use that
kind of language around us – you’re gone.” OK Pisspants. I hope you didn’t spend too
long gluing your knackers back on because those babies are coming off again in the next
few minutes. You see, the analogy you drew made it sound
like you’re sitting quietly in your living room and then being forced to fend off hordes
of home invaders like the paragon of virtue that you are. However, a more accurate description
of what you’re really doing is leaning out of your window shouting disgusting insults
at random passersby, and then cravenly refusing to open the door when they demand to be let
in to give you the damn good kicking that you so sorely deserve. Because, make no mistake,
Pisspants, the things you say about atheists, and the lies you try to smear over the work
of the people responsible for you not living in a hovel subsisting on a diet of rotten
turnips and rat-***, are every bit as vile and disgusting as anything I’ve ever said.
So the only difference between us when it comes to manners is our choice in vocabulary,
and since I’ve been demonstrably and consistently more intellectually honest and honorable you've
ever been, and all I’ve ever done is respond to ***-baggery initiated by you, I contend
that that makes you twice the arsehole I am, and more.
In addition, your claim that I've been excluded from your parlor because of my earthy lexicon
also falls rather short since I now have quite a collection of testimonies from users who’ve
been blocked or had comments rejected or removed, not because of any bad language, but merely
for having the gall to disagree with you. In addition, I've included in the description
links to two videos by AtheismTV providing videographic documentation of both you and
Cockshite blocking them out-of-hand for merely asking a polite question that might have made
you feel uncomfortable. I should also add that since I didn’t make much of an effort
to gather all this evidence, I contend that it’s just the very tip of a gigantic iceberg
floating on the ocean of *** that your channel has produced over the years.
Of particular note on this list is the Christian user, TrustinJC, who’s explained in both
written and video form how he’s not only been blocked by both you and Cockshite, but
how you personally, Pisspants, tried to badger him into retracting his unfavorable review
of Pastor Bollox’s book on Amazon – yet another example of your fine, upstanding Christian
behavior, no doubt. And funnily enough, I also later discovered that a comment of his
on one of my videos that included an exposition of your abject dishonesty in the Amazon incident
was mysteriously the only one to have been marked as spam. Quite the coincidence, don’t
you think? Now, I’ve seen you back-peddling on this
blatant lie regarding your censorship policies on your comment page where you’re now claiming
that your gagging isn’t restricted to just obscenity, but to anything that you would
not accept in your home. Well, again, based just on my testimonies, it seems that disagreeing
with you in any way whatsoever falls into that category. That in itself, of course,
would be fine if you had the decency to admit that that’s what you’re doing – that
is blanket censorship of all dissenting voices. But instead you try and justify your cravenness
by hiding behind your weasel words and ignoring the fact that you’re *** who started
hurling your disgusting assertions into the public forum from the safety of your filthy
hovel. So while you’re free to behave in this despicable
manner, Pisspants; while you’re free to sling your *** around the internet like a
chimp in a cage and then act horrified when some of it gets slung back; while you’re
free to cower behind your censorship and hide the weaknesses in your pitiful arguments from
your subscribers, do be aware of the consequence. That being that no one outside of your cadre
of sycophantic, self-affirming cretins takes you, your arguments or your pathetic challenges
seriously, because your behavior makes you about as credible as a priest who can’t
wash the ***-stains out of his cassock. “And besides, using that kind of language
– I tell my children this all the time – if you’re use that kind of lang… using that
kind of language is the leading indicator of a lesser intellect. So if you can’t use
proper intellectual language – then you’re not welcome on our channel.”
You really are a spectacularly stupid man, aren’t you Pisspants? I swear that if someone
told you that nut-sweat cured erectile dysfunction that you’d be signing yourself up for yoga
classes in a heartbeat. And, considering what I’m sure you’re teaching your poor, educationally
bereft children about modern science, this freshly crimped-off erroneous *** is but
a drop in the ocean. To elaborate, I’ve already demonstrated
what a pile to *** your prudish remonstrations amount to, but the point of this clip was
to show you resorting to that old stalwart of the *** who utterly incapable of responding
to an intellectual superior – that being the “people who swear are dumb” defense.
Unfortunately, for you though, you made an error so large here that, since I’m still
in possession of your *** from the last segment, I shall now proceed to stuff them so far up
your bunghole that you’ll be tasting them every time you burp.
Because coming from the person who claims that I’m the one who can’t use “proper
intellectual language” it’s priceless that shortly afterwards you also said this
about me: “In fact schoolgirls are probably got more,
er, more, er… bravado than this person.” I can only assume that you have no idea what
“bravado” means, do you Pisspants? Because last time I looked Webster’s defined it
as “blustering swaggering conduct” or “a pretense of bravery”. Thus, in effect
what you said here is that a schoolgirl is able to talk smack better than I. And while
that may or may not be the case, I think it’s safe to say that your intent was to cast aspersions
on my valor, in which case the word you were looking for and yet failing dismally to find
was “courage”. Or “bravery”. Or “fearlessness”. Or “doughtiness”.
So if you think profanity is a unique indicator of a “lesser intellect”, Pisspants, what
do you think your abysmal grasp of the English language means? Again, since I know that thinking
isn’t your strong suit, I’ll give you a clue. You’re a moron, dipshit.
“We were not ignoring the challenge. We offered the debate to him. A real debate.
With… er… with… with… with…guidelines, and rules, and so on. But he refuses. He runs
away like a… like a coward. Like a little schoolgirl.”
Well, Pisspants, aside from the fact that you managed to not ignore the challenge for
two and a half years, I think I've clearly demonstrated why the "debate" you were offering
was as laughable as your pretentions to intellectualism. Furthermore, seeing as how even your definitions
for your censorship guidelines during just this whole sorry incident were as elastic
as Kent Hovind's *** sphincter, I think it's pretty clear that the "rules" you would have
enforced as an "impartial" moderator would have essentially amounted to "anything you
*** felt like". And if you want to protest that – if you want to maintain that you're
a decent Christian and that you would never behave in such a despicably dishonest manner
- then I suggest you take some time to reflect on your demonstrated public behavior to date.
Because from your track record it's evident that you can be trusted about as much as a
priest in a confessional with a choirboy. And if any of your subscribers happen to watching
this I would recommend that you spare a moment to take an honest and open minded look that
record, because if you do you'll discover that all people like Pisspants and Cockshite
are doing is making all Christians erroneously look like a bunch of disingenuous, dishonest,
dishonorable, disgusting ***. Hello everyone. As part of this whole incident
I was contacted by ShockofGod and he asked me mention that he would love any atheists
to join him for discussions at his chat-room at shockawenow-dot-net. He says he's, and
I quote "extremely tolerant to my atheist friends there", and would welcome you all.
While I can't confirm or deny the veracity of that claim, I did say I'd pass on the message,
and since I'm a man of my word, there it is. Also, I'm taking what may well be an extended
sabbatical from making videos to both recharge my batteries and try recover my lost enthusiasm.
While I can't promise I'll get back to it I will make every effort to do so, but in
any case, I'll still be posting shout-outs and still be around in the comments sections
of others' videos. In the meantime, if you're wondering what you're going to do to replace
your regular dose of brutal pwnage, might I suggest you head over and subscribe to the
channel of the spectacular Snakepliskinist. This gentleman is obviously well versed in
the sciences and uses his knowledge to disabuse not only creationists, but all manner of delusional
*** in all manner of amusing ways. If you like to watch facts being inserted violently
into well-deserving recta, you can't go wrong with this channel.
Finally, AnticitizenX, an incredibly talented video maker that you should all be subscribed
to, made an excellent suggestion to me that I counter Pisspants' offer with a more equitable
one of my own. As a result I've included terms for an unbiased video-exchange based debate
with either he or Cockshite in the description. Should either decide to try their luck in
a situation where facts are more important than rhetoric and where they'll be expected
to back up assertions with evidence, then I'll be happy to put my hiatus on hold. Feel
free to pass on the message to either defective, as I've been blocked by both channels.
As always, thanks for your support, and until (hopefully) next time – all the best and
take care. �