Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
thank you mister chairman i i'd appreciate the opportunity i would just
make one brief comment and i only have one question
at first of all this in the interest of
transparency which seems to be defeated
we should take note the four of the seven presenters here today so
interrelated
uh... city and each other's boards of directors at the constitu really one
opinion is like one
incestuous union-busting daisy chain of
it's really
you know
i know they history of america sharper than doing within three years there
crated for the express purpose of boston unions in the construction industry
that's that declaration to serve them interested particularly
in one comment uh... made by mister smith fit
the cost of we're looking at him and we may be witnessing the genesis of a
boondoggle in terms of the complexity of the re reporting contemplated here
and why would we setup this expensive bureaucracy just for further in the
private commercial entrust
of america contractors or the true architecting protagonists of this bill
the chairman of time you spend the t_m_ pima lately drafting this thing mister
ebert might be carrying the ball but it was crafted
by a notary issue in boston
terrence ho ki
so why would we want to spend all this money to further the commercial
self-interest
of wonder tourist union buster within that industry mr smith for
the opinion