Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
The economical thought at Caritas in veritate
with Sergio Morisoli
THE POVERTY IS NOT NICE TO SEE
This poverty has another risk,
which is insidious,
being seen, by who detains
then the possibility to do something,
to see it only from an aesthetic point of view.
It’s something that should not exist.
Not a poverty to understand,
and then undertake in order to make
it so it’s produces less, that it minimizes,
because the abolition will never be possible,
already Christ thought us that the poor
will always be between us,
while, if we see it under an esthetical aspect
it’s something to remove,
it’s something to eliminate,
then, more or less, with different sensibilities,
one may be more sensible,
to be engaged in the real centre
of what causes the poverty,
but, in preview it’s becoming
a phenomena which must disappear,
because it’s not aesthetic
for our way of living.
A little like the free distribution of the drugs,
it’s not aesthetic because we would have
children who break shop windows
to provide the means to buy the dose.
That means, we are on this slope,
namely this things very difficult to solve,
become partially solvable if
they're put under an optic of cleaning,
of aesthetic and order.
But we don't solve the problem with this,
we put it aside, it hides its self.
It’s probably this, this phenomena are not,
are no more called with it’s correct way,
namely education, culture, school and other,
and language, not last; and in the same time,
through the law, they are neither regulated,
not solved, not having called them
in the right way, correctly,
with the articles, so it's maybe,
that there is a vicious circle in this sense,
exactly also of definition of meaning.