Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
HAVE THIS [ BLEEP ] SURGERY.
>> CLEARLY CRIMINAL DEFENSE
ATTORNEY ADAM THOMPSON, NONE OF
THESE WITNESSES BUY THIS GUY'S
ACT AND THEY ALL THOUGHT HE WAS
ACTING.
AGAIN, IS THERE SOMETHING MORE
THAT THE PROSECUTION CAN DO WITH
THAT AS OPPOSED TO, YEAH, IT'S A
PASSIVE ARGUMENT IF YOU KNOW
WHAT I MEAN AS OPPOSED TO HERE'S
WHAT HE DID DO.
>> IT IS.
YOU ALWAYS RATHER HAVE DIRECT
EVIDENCE RATHER THAN
CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE.
THERE'S A LOT OF CIRCUMSTANTIAL
EVIDENCE, HE HAD A MISTRESS
WAITING IN THE WINGS, PUSHING
HIS WIFE TO HAVE A FACELIFT AND
LOADING UP HER ON DRUG.
YOU CAN GO ON AND ON.
THE BOTTOM LINE IS THIS.
THEY ULTIMATELY HAVE TO PROVE
SHE WAS KILLED.
IT STARTS WITH THE AUTOPSY
REPORT AND ALL OF THE AUTOPSY
REPORTS COME BACK AS NOT SHOWING
HOMICIDE.
YOU MENTIONED WHY JODI ARIAS WAS
CONVICTED.
SHE TESTIFIED IN HER CASE.
AND LET ME TELL YOU, WHEN A
PERSON DOESN'T TESTIFY AND
YOU'RE CHARGED AS A DEFENDANT, A
JURY DOESN'T GET TO SEE AND HEAR
FROM YOU FIRSTHAND, IT'S ALL
HEARSAY THROUGH OTHER WITNESSES.
IN THAT CASE ONCE SHE GOT ON THE
STAND THAT PROSECUTION RIPPED
HER TO SHEDS AND EXPOSED HER AND
THEN THE JURY SAW HOW CRAZY SHE
WAS.
THAT WAS THE END OF HER.
IF SHE DIDN'T TESTIFY, WHO KNOW
WHAT IS THE OUTCOME WOULD HAVE
BEEN.