Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
German politic's Femme Fatale has struck again!
Not too long ago, Angela "Grimace of Reluctance" Merkel showed her true face.
The visage of dread, to be precise.
Instead of being worthy of her office, to fight discrimination and idiocy...
...Angie decided, on the 1st of december this year, to grace herself with a little bit more CDU profile...
... and to boost discrimination and idiocy all Stoiber-like.
Unlike a decent, not completly nutty person...
... who would've granted marriage equality as a matter of course and went on their merry way,
...proving to be truely grand,
... the winner of the "Inverted Smile '92" recommended...
... to her party to reject fiscal equality.
Since naturally there is no ACTUAL reasoning behind this,
... auntie Angela reached deeply into the box of lowered bars...
... to drag out the bottom sediment as an explanation.
I cite:
"I personally want to maintain the fiscal privilege of marriage,
... since our constitution sees marriage in direct relation with the family,
... and casts both under the special protection of the state's system."
Sounds astoundingly silly, and it actually IS.
What on first sight looks like a meaningless expression,
... reveals itself as an unequaled insult to multiple parts of the population on a closer look.
And the heir of 'Donation Scandal Pear' (Helmut Kohl) isn't even ashamed to blurt that out loud.
On one hand, the forced connection of marriage and family is already a laughably crazy idea,
... since not every marrige brings forth offspring inevitably.
And exactly for that reason both terms are mentioned separatly in the constitution...
... which could've been avoided if both were meant to be synonymous.
On the other hand it degrades marriage to a simple birthing machinery...
... in which the core reason for said marriage, the love of two people, doesn't matter any more at all.
Beside the point that children are not summoned via marriage,
... but through the occasional plugging together of genitalia,
... which is physically possible even without any marriage at all.
Seen that on a science show!
To utilize this kind of curled poop as an explanation...
... as to why one shouldn't grant marriage equality,
... announces, in flowery officialese, the assumption gays and lesbians would...
... NEVER found a family.
UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES! NEVER EVER! NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER! NUTHIN! NADA! ZILCH!
The concept of adoption seems to elude her together with the insight...
... that there won't be any more children with or without equality anyways.
The fact that homosexual couples can't have babies together through biological means...
... is no deeper insight of which the denial of basic human rights could be derived,
... but a simple human physiological fact of the likes of infertile heterosexuals being unable to have children through 'common' means.
Is our 'chancelloreuse' about to deny THEM marriage too?
Are we about to hear:' I'm very sorry, but you are physically insufficient to be granted the tax regulations that come with the institution of marriage.'
'No big deal, right? We have this civil union thing lying around that's for inferior citizens.'
'Could I maybe interest you into this kind of thing?'
I would LOVE to hear the outrage that'd rush through the public body.
But we won't...
After all one could utilize the many means of modern medicine,
... or adopt one of the many children that were left behind (by heterosexuals).
The fact that gays and lesbians could do exactly that as well,
... is again swept under the idiocy stained carpet of silence.
But we faggots looooove to get screwed over~
After all, we're just a bunch of perverted, promiscuous, motorway-restroom-opportunity-shaggers, whom sow AIDS into the wild like the peasant his GM corn. Right?
That's about what the CDU/CSU really thinks about us.
Prejudices, born out of ignorance and horrifyingly stupid assumptions.
Assumptions like:
Homosexuality is a choice!
Suuure, we CHOSE to be the clobbering sac for everyone... WTF!?!?
Homosexuality is a disease!
Shhh! No it isn't. It's called behavioural diversity and is completely normal for a population of primates.
The Bible vituperates homosexuality, ergo it must be a bad thing!
*sigh* The Bible also "vituperates" shellfish - which are quite popular on political congresses, so?
When the gays raise children, they'll become gay as well!
And when a caucasian kid grows up in an afro-american family... it'll become black!? I'd really like to see that!
Dem Homos gonna *** children if we let them!
*sigh* Yeah sure, cause we're gonna *** ANYTING that's not on a tree on the count of three. Helloooo? ***? The term HAS a meaning. You realize that right? ... Right?
And similarly untenable attempts to demonize one group of people, simply to justify their own aversions towards them.
Aversions that basically always come down to this:
"I find that kind of disgusting... sort of..."
Ain't I right, Madame Non?
You're free to feel that way, dear Angie. But simply because you and your christian clique have a somewhat suboptimal relation towards the diversity of human *** behaviour,
... you don't have charge at people, pooping straight in their faces, for it.
If you are unable to find the grandeur to grant people different than yourself the same rights than towards your own kind,
... maybe you should make room for people who can.
Or you could apply for a job in Uganda.
In any case, to perform with such a dark aged attitude, only to please your christian fundamentalist core group,
... doesn't exactly heighten your chances for a re-eclection with the rest of the people.
Or do you actually think, declaring about 15-20% of the population as second class citizens would be beneficial to that?
Let me give you a hint: IT ISN'T!
Additionaly it's not exactly helping to relay practically EVERY disagreeable decision towards the Federal Constitutional Court,
... JUST to grant you a little more time to look a tad more meaty to your 'Christian Dilettante Union'.
In that case we could just let the judges rule after all.
In this case it might've even be better... and more efficient... and less aggravating...
I would just like to have a piece of that cake, you and your "Sourpot" (her husband Mr. Sauer) are cramming into your greedy mouths for almost fourteen years now...
Start baking... on christmas we're having fish. (a german proverb meaning: Hurry up already!)