Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
one of the most objectionable in silly things that went on during the the first
election of prop obama was that idea that he was pallin around with
terrorists like bill ayers the would after the he got elected at
give them a room i guess in the west wing or something like that
uh... but we have uh... some recent footage of bilayers let's find out what
proc obama's powell thinks of them now
isn't morocco mama as the sole authority for drone using the agent i respect
absolutely
absolutely
do you think the obama he put on trial for absolutely every president
in in this century should be to put on trial everyone of them for one dash for
war crimes absolutely everything
absolutely
every one of them goes into office
and offers dripping with blood and adds to it
and yes i think that these are war crimes and i think they're acts of
terror
so if that works for for no
for some of the tune of actually it's like i can just picture taken with was a
little person is shown
it said that he drops the throes of this trial has a conversation
call morning commute an eight hundred
at school by cash cab
but not as exciting it happened next garcetti said everyone solicit record
and when you get a question wrong clearly don't have to get out of the
cathy catherine uh... so if you know anything about the the the history of
bilayers of course i doubt maybe you'd be surprised that he's somewhat radical
actually i mean he's got the hearing everything
unsold brought obama's pal not quite as powell anymore i'd know what's
interesting is that while characterize this is obviously an extreme reaction to
what you know be-bop a bomb in the previous presidents have done
on some level and to really disagree with them that that many of our proper
past presence of clearly by the standards we would apply to other
countries are administrations
engaged in war crimes
the killing of of the the extra did judicial killing of citizens of other
countries or our country's prosecuting wars where obviously things that again
but if other countries have done some of the things we've done it war in the past
two decades we would label them as war crimes
so is this an extreme position
it's not an extreme position night xa it's largely irrelevant position i
suppose it was uh...
uh... balances and distributes
extreme perceived can't get much more extreme somewhat
bilayers is saying so the position
if extremism defined as not being within the mainstream of opinion the invited
british inactive should it be outside the mainstream
you know and
i mean ek or should we just stopped
prosecuting heads of state for war crimes because of the heads of state and
they're trying to defend their states
in whatever way they see fit sometimes they're defended with extreme aggression
uh... as a preemptive strike
but you know i mean you could
you know you you you will just not going to warn the ruin of the world right
after seven straightened out for a more cynical even what you said i think we
should be honest in this state are actual position that we'll prosecute
four and leaders of countries were not allied with
but not our allies and not ourselves that we we are allowed to do this
israel might be allowed to do this on the close allies of ours might be a that
might be allowed to engage in some his actions but not countries or not allies
with the
first of all nothing to do something that that seems to be our standard
operating procedure what makes it an extreme position
is that there is a reasonable position
toehold that
that oh mama and bush and maybe clinton
uh... and the first bush should maybe all of them tried andrey and everybody
is he says could be tried for worker but that's not a conversation that you have
the morning drive-thru starbucks
i think it's incredibly complicated and as always
what is left out of these conversations not to minimize what bill is said and he
certainly has a right to his opinion these thought about it too
there is a counter-argument you know and and one thing that that i think that is
left out frequently in almost all these debates when you take a very strong
aggressive position is that there's gotta be somebody else's side is going
to make a different argument that argument's going to be reasons too
and so
who should allow the tribal war crimes i'd like to see i would be interested in
the bait
with bill ayers
and a constitutional law professor
whose sympathetic to that argument but who argue against it because it would be
an interesting org
you know that's not gonna happen in the car
you know i i i don't know what does that seem more officers fundamental it
i've always felt the like yes there there come a time when a prep when a
president might feel like if i don't do acts if i don't get in this action
than americans might die we might lose four something like that
and maybe uh... until our legal actions by the way and maybe you make the
decision at that time
this needs to be done or the nation will be harmed
i think that's perfectly fine to make that decision
but then issue prosecuted for it
and it and if you or a if you're a good strong patriotic american maybe saving
thousands of american lives or stopping the downfall of the country something
like that is worth you spending the rest of your life in jail
so i think that that i don't know what it really disagree i think being
president in this democracy is a nuance job i thinking nobody knows what it's
like
going to sleep brocco bomb a didn't know until he was president going to sleep at
night
knowing that you know that something you did that day may put somebody in harm's
way in a country that you hadn't heard of before you became president so uh...
i_d_ i can't pretend to know what that's like but
there are when you were the president united states there are things going
part of the job i'm not saying the person but the job
that that u
by default on fortunately because we do go to war because we are an aggressive
about democracy
because of that there are things you're going to do that
are that to eight a citizen two eight
civilian
seem as if what you're saying that this guy should be prosecuted took the risky
stabilizer issued in jail for
i think there is there has to be a different standard when it comes to the
way the president offered in does its job
jack bridgeable pointed like this are certain things that just defending your
sense of sensibility in fairness even in war and what gets me every time
uh... double tap
emdr on strike began it you're prosecuting enemy drawn strikes or prop
from 'em
bomb manned by people at the distinction that i don't
it's not station that strikes me is terribly interested
then when people come to save those guys and rescue people
and then you have another strike on them
that strikes me is
meeting a standard for which violates
terms of war of which i'm not anti really familiar with them
and and we're guest led to believe that that has happened and if it's happened
intentionally
and that that was the idea
uh... to sort of send a message
then that's then that would bet would cost to do something that i would say is
worth looking at