Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
What we will do today is talk about more about combustion because we identified that combustion
was one of the main reasons for most of the air pollutants that you see in the atmosphere.
We will quickly see what you have done probably in your undergraduate. We are looking into
the thermodynamics or engines. You study a little bit about engines irrespective of what
branch you come from. We all understand there are two-stroke engines and there are four-stroke
engines. Two-stroke engines are a little dirtier because ah we are not giving enough time for
the combustion to complete and not getting the equivalence in the process.
Anyway, let us have a quick look at four-stroke-engines that are spark ignition engines. In fact,
in India, a policy decision has been taken that we will not produce any more two-stroke
engines. I would like that you recall the two-stroke engines and four-stroke engines.
Within that, there are two types of engine ľ one is the spark ignition engine and the
other is the compression engine or that can be ignited on its own. When we talk about
compression-ignition internal engines, these are largely trucks, buses, locomotives, ships
and so on. Some large engines are compression engines but they may also be two-stroke. They
are very very few. Apart from that, we should understand or at least recall that there are
four cycles or four strokes ľ intake, compression, expansion and exhaust. Do not read so much
in here because there is a little figure that you will all recall. That is much better and
easier to understand.
The first stroke is intake. What you see on the top of this is the intake valve. The fuel
is withdrawn and the piston is moving down. This is the outlet or exhaust ľ you see that
it is closed here because there is a closing here. Once this is completely filled with
air and fuel, then compression starts. So the piston is moving up and both are closed
ľ see here, the intake is also closed and the exhaust is also closed (the little line
you see). So we get a compression stroke. Then, there is a power or expansion stroke.
In that case also, both the valves ľ inlet as well as outlet or exhaust ľ should be
closed. These are closed. Once you have the exhaust, the inlet is closed, the exhaust
should open, things move out from there and as a result, the cycle goes on and then we
continue to get the power stroke. You can also see that this position where the theta
is 0.ů Theta is called the crank angle between the piston rod and the crank rod and then
this is called as theta. When it is in this position, this is called top dead center ľ
we all know that, then theta is zero. Whatever the angle is, that is theta. When it is at
the bottom dead center, the theta is equal to 180.
In two-stroke engine, there will be only two strokes but most of the time, we in India
are talking mostly about the four-stroke engines. In fact, you see that all scooters have been
converted to four-stroke engines. We will probably see in the lecture that four-stroke
engines are cleaner than two-stroke engines. In two-stroke, you get the power very quickly.
Every second stroke, you are getting the power but in four-strokeů. The kind of pickup that
you have in scooters that were two-stroke (Priya and all) will be much more than the
other scooters, but the technology is changing very rapidly in this case. We do not want
to be experts on this but we still want to understand a few things.
This is the same thing that we described ľ the top dead center, the bottom dead center
and the crank angle. Sometimes, the emissions also depend on the position where the piston
is. I will pass this on to you, so you do not have to worry about this. I want to tell
you a little bit about fuels ľ not so much into detail but what are the fuels.
We all know natural gas or CNG (compressed natural gas). You are all seeing that there
is a revolution ľ more and more people are using CNG now. Earlier, most of the time,
it was gasoline but you see that CNG has become very popular now. CNG is largely methane;
it is a very clean fuel, simple and safe. It is not proper for somebody to say it is
not safe ľ it is safe. The burners that you require to burn CNG are very cheap burners
because the cost of the burner sometimes is exorbitant.
The earlier problem as to why methane was not used was largely with storage and refilling.
It was not easy to store at the petrol pumps or in the engine and refilling was more of
a problem ľ how do you refill the whole thing. But these problems have been taken care with
technology and now, you can find more and more outlets. It takes a while. First, of
course, you bring the pipeline and then the transport through the trucks is a little difficult.
Moreover, how to transfer the CNG was a problem. The other associated problem with natural
gas is that when it comes out from its source, there is a significant amount of H2S along
with this. CO2 and then nitrogen and H2S especially must be removed. Sometime, the H2S can be
in percentage. Just imagine in percentage. Suppose there is a plant dealing with methane
production and there are some leakages there. Leakage of the methane in the atmosphere because
there is already a significant amount of methane in the atmosphere.
But if the H2S leaks along with this, there will be a hue and cry. The order threshold
of H2S is as low as 40 micrograms per meter cube. A little amount of methane makes people
uncomfortable. They may find there is something terribly wrong when H2S is in percentage.
Earlier because of these problems and storage and transportation, people were not using
methane. In fact, in many of the oil fields, methane was simply burnt because they were
interested in the liquid product but things have changed with technology and we are using
a lot of CNG. Liquefied petroleum gas that we use in houses
is largely propane. It is a clean fuel, simple, safe, cheap burners, easy to store and refill
because you cannot liquefy CNG whereas you can liquefy this because it is a higher molecular
compound. You can liquefy this and store it and right in the atmospheric temperature with
the pressure that you are dealing with, it can be liquefied as well as in the vapor phase
also and then you can use this. It is easy to store and refill. Many things are using
LPG ľ not just in houses but even in automobiles, we have started using LPG.
Both reasonably burn well but methane is directly available at the source. Wherever you are
doing the exploration, methane is a product along with liquid crude that you get. LPG
is to be produced and processed at the plant. LPG will not come out because CNG is in the
gas form and so it will come automatically but LPG is produced in the refinery. The problem
with LPG is refilling. If you go to CNG outlets, they are able to
fill CNG for you but for LPG, the cylinders are exchange because you cannot do refilling
of LPG so easily ľ this needs to be liquefied and stored. This little bit reminds meů suppose
you are at home and you have the LPG cylinderů we are drifting from our topic but ů.
This is the storage. LPG is really liquid inside and there is a vapor above this. So
it has vapor pressure and then this vapor constantly comes out. You are burning this
vapor. This is the problem. Since it is the pressure that is maintained by this and the
pressure is always the same, the problem with LPG in households is that you will never know
when LPG cylinders are likely to be emptied unless you put then on the weighing scale.
We all know that housewives suddenly say that gas is finished. Gas is finished because pressure
is always there here because of this. Pressure is not reduced but suddenly as this goes by,
the pressure is still maintained and then this disappears suddenly. This is a very simple
mechanism. It takes the heat from the surrounding environment and then this becomes in the vapor
phase and what you need is the latent heat, which it takes from the surroundings.
Suppose you run into the problem, try this. When you run into the problem and your mother
or your wife or whosoever you are working with suddenly says the gas is finished, you
canů. You might have even observed that shopkeepers or restaurant people will not keep it vertical.
Of course, you should keep it vertical but they will put it upside down and in the winter
especially, if you can put a little hot water on this ľ not very advisable but during an
emergency, you put hot water on this, lay it down and put a little hot water because
you can get hot water from electricity or you have the hot water somehow, you might
still be able to reuse the remaining little liquid that you have because that was not
able to vaporize because you need a little heat in that area. You have laid it down so
that the pressure is built up on this side and this can vaporize because this is a liquefied
gas and you can still use it. Some people wrap the clothes and put a little
hot water and then your LPG cylinder will work a little bit longer than ordinarily.
But now, people have ways by which they can even directly from the petrol pump fill the
propane into the vehicle. Of course, there is stationary combustion ľ people do use
this easily. Let us also talk about solid fuels. I will pass on this table. Just have
a look at this as to what are solid fuels because the major problem of air pollution
is largely from solid fuels.
You see coal and all. This is a little analysis that is taken from a book. You can burn wood,
heat, lignite, sub-bituminous and bituminous coal. As the ageing process happens, the carbon
content goes up. You have the wood. You have carbon, hydrogen and oxygen, some amount of
nitrogen is there, some amount of sulfur is there and ash of course is a very significant
part. These are the typical numbers. They can vary significantly depending on what source
we are talking about. There are coals that may have sulfur content
as high as 4 percent, there are coals from certain that may have the ash content or especially
the bituminous coal, ash content as high as 50 percent, but we still burn them because
we get energy. Therefore, the coal will have many things that can burn other than carbon
and hydrogen. Solid fuels will have a lot of emissions of ash, a lot of emissions of
oxides and nitrogen and also a lot of emissions of sulfur dioxide. Here, what you need to
see is the carbon, hydrogen, oxygen and nitrogen sulfate.
When you want to reduce the carbon dioxide emissions, when you want to reduce the carbon
dioxide emission, these fuels are obviously no good because nowadays, people are looking
very comprehensively at what kind of fuel we should use to reduce CO2 emissions because
of global warming. Some of the students may know this ľ now, you can trade. This also
becomes a factor that you want to use this coal or this coal because the emissions of
carbon dioxide will be much lower here. This is the general formula for getting the
heating value of the coal in terms of the dry values computed from the equation. The
high heating values as the British thermal unit per pound, you can always do the conversion,
is times of the carbon and times the hydrogen minus oxygen because if the oxygen is more,
that is not going to burn plus this quantity with the sulfur. This becomes very very small
in terms of the heat value but this sulfur can also burn and it can give you some heat.
This will be in very very small quantities. Just do some calculation. We have some values
here. Average wet basis as delivered receiving,
heating values are given here and then this is on the dry basis. I do not know if you
want to try this. Try this and see that you get this number to indicate as to how much
heat will be available. Depending on your source, you can useů. Why I am talking to
about especially about the carbon content is we might just quite relate it toů. Some
of you know but let me alsoů.
We all know that we have to reduce the CO2 emissions. One of the techniques is CDM. In
this case, rich countries can invest in developing countries in terms of low CO2 emission technology
and get carbon credit. Here, the idea isů. Suppose I have mostly anthracite coal in the
country and I am going to burn most of the anthracite. I am a developing country and
I have no choice, I have to still develop. Suppose some country comes forward and says,
ôPlease do not burn this. For part of the coal, we will supply you with better coal,
which has low carbonö, the CO2 emission will reduce but the reduction in the CO2 emission
that will occur will go to as a credit to the other country and that is called as CDM.
This is the mechanism. CO2 is a global issue. Wherever you can control, it is an advantage.
That is what I wanted to tell you about fuels. Let me also tell you about the SO2 issue,
which you see here.
SO2 is largely in the organic form and it can even burn much before the carbon burns.
The moment you fire, you might not able to burn some carbon and then carbon may appear
in your ash, but sulfur will never appear in your ash because sulfur will quickly take
off and burn. That is very very important to understand because sometimes, people will
say some sulfur will be in the ash, some sulfur will not burn but most of theů I should say
sulfur. One of the first things to burn is SO2. You should have an idea of the fuels,
what kind of, what is lignite and what is wood.
Wood has very low ash content but then again, the energy per ton of coal is more here. When
compared to what we burn in India, it is a little bit on the higher side because in India,
the ash content will be very very high. These are not the picture from theů. Are we burning
lignite somewhere in India? NLC. Neyveli Lignite Corporation. They have a huge power plant
based on lignite and they also have other uses for the lignite.
I am still talking about the engines. The emission depends on the air-fuel ratio ľ
we will examine that in detail, ignition time, compression ratio, combustion chamber geometry,
engine speed and type of fuel. The pollutant emission will depend on the internal combustion.
We will see some of them and we will not see some of them because it depends on what extent
we want to go. We can skip this slide because I do not want to discuss so much.
The pollutants in the combustion processes are nitrogen oxides, CO, hydrocarbons and
soot. You can add sulfur dioxide, because sulfur dioxide is also a very very important
issue. Let us see how it is happening.
Let us talk about nitrogen oxide because that is a very serious issue we have and let me
also define phi. You remember that we defined the equivalence ratio last time. What was
that if you wrote that? This is the same thing, the equivalence ratio.
Now, quickly tell me if the equivalence ratio is less than 1. Am I on the leaner side or
am I on the richer side? Leaner side. Leaner side, okay. If that is the case, let us have
a look at someů. We have defined phi. When the people look at the actual thing, I am
trying to give the reason behind this, when is the peak NO? NO is only formedů happens
when the slightly lean of stoichiometric and phi is close to 0.9.
If it is on the leaner side, here you see the NO peak is not here at stoichiometry but
it is here somewhere. The formation is somewhere here, because the oxygen surplus is there.
Then in that case, we are talking about the excess oxygen. It does not necessarily mean
that NO levels will continue to go high as you increase the emissions. Why? It is because
you need certain temperatures also. What happens? It is very sensitive to the temperature because
you need high activation energy. In the process when you are going too much on the leaner
side, it means you are not supplying enough fuel, so temperature will drop.
As the temperature drops, then NO will not form although you may have a lot of oxygen
because as you are moving this side, you are having more and more of oxygen or excess of
fuel on this side. But two combinations are required ľ you should have excess air also
we talked and high temperature. When you want to manage things, you can either manage by
controlling the oxygen or by controlling the temperature. We will see that maybe today
or maybe in the next class. Note there is a terminology here. You see
prompt NO ľ we will see that in a moment, but stay with the term prompt NO. Prompt NO
is that NO which is formed first and we will see how that is formed. Before you can think
of anything else, prompt NO happens. These methods with thermal NO were devised by Zeldovich
and so, that is sometime called Zeldovich NO. The person who identified prompt NO was
Fennimore. It could be due to oxygen atoms that are in the flame front or due to carbon
and hydrocarbons and C2 molecules in the flame, which is in the front. Before even nitrogen
and oxygen in the atmosphere can react, what you see here is that this thing can occur
and you will see that even this hydrocarbon can react to some extent with the nitrogen
and can produce nitrogen dioxide. Earlier, we were talking about just N and O. That is
fine, that is one route.
What you see hereů. One route is of course if you have the O, if you have this, then
this can be quickly formed because the activation energy requirement isů
This is a slow process, the activation requirement is high and with this, it can react and it
can form NO. The activation requirement is this reaction must faster. Zeldovich NO occurs
in the burned gases because excess everything had happened. This reaction of formation of
N2O2 is slow and the burned gases are downstream of the flame front and not in the flame front
itself. But this does not tell us the whole story because something else occurs right
in the flame. What happens? Experiments show that some NO forms inside the flame that is
called prompt NO. It may not depend on temperature, it may not depend on the nitrogen in the fuel.
We will show you the plot of NO versus distance from the flame. Extrapolate back to the flame
front location. This is defined asů. I will show you this picture in a moment. Experiments
show that prompt NO is more prevalent in the hydrocarbon flames and for fuel-rich flames.
Even if the fuel is rich even though there is less oxygen in the rich fuel, this situation,
for prompt NO, this is not very important ľ what is the temperature and so on but the
reactions that may occur ů.
You see here when people plotted this, they found that there was a quick NO level and
then stabilized. That was more because of the thermal NO as we moved away from this.
The point I am trying to make here is that for this formation, it does not even matter
whether you have excess air or not. A part or a very small amount of the oxygen that
you are supplying even for the combustion might just be taken by the nitrogen there.
How it happens is that you have some hydrocarbons. With this hydrocarbon , there are two routes
possible. people are still discussing how it happens. This hydrocarbon can react with
nitrogen also, which is there along with the air and it can make atomic nitrogen. This
atomic nitrogen can react with oxygen. If you recall from the last slide, was this reaction
faster or slower? Faster. It was much faster. This reaction can happen and you can get some
NO because it is much faster than the form and 2 plus O. Some people also say that some
carbon may be available for the nitrogen to form CN. CN can react with the oxygen to give
CO and NO. This can also happen. You can also see that although you may have a lot of oxygen,
you may still produce CO in the process. But the most likely process is the one where you
can get the prompt NOx. There is nothing much you can do about prompt NOx ľ that will be
formed. You cannot do much about that because this happens right in the flame. People are
always looking at the ways and means to control the prompt NO but again, this is not a very
significant amount. I do not really know how much it is but it could be 2 percent, 3 percent
or 4 percent. The new thing that you have learnt is prompt
NO. It is formed because of the reaction between the hydrocarbon and nitrogen before it can
be taken up by the oxygen. It may produce atomic nitrogen and that can very quickly
react with the oxygen even before this oxygen can take on the hydrocarbons. That is what
is called the prompt NO. This is a little picture that you shouldů. Let us spend some
time on this.
People did two experiments to say how much can be thermal NOx and so on. First, they
did with the normal oxygen. They were burning petroleum, dried fuels, shell fuel and coal-derived.
The coals are shown as little squares as you can see there ľ one, two, three, four. They
did a regular operation. Nitrogen content was there in the fuel. Then, the next time
they did the same experiment with different fuels with different matter in content but
this time what they did was they supplied pure oxygen or pure oxygen along with the
argon. Obviously, the NOx formation will be much less.
Probably I should say the same thing. The lower curve shows the fuel nitrogen conversion
as is determined by substituting an argon/oxygen mixture for the combustion air. Obviously,
it will be only the fuel NOx that will be formed so that with the difference, they could
find out what is the quantity of the total and this will be largely with the thermal
NOx. That is what probably you can control or you
can try to minimize this NOx as opposed to the NOx that may come out from the fuel. Then,
you can also see that well this thing is somewhat higher than the coal that you will see here.
This is here, this is here and the corresponding revaluation will be somewhere here because
all need to have one-to-one correspondence. Coal is in fact a very significant source
of oxides of nitrogen. This gives you a little idea of how people could figure out that part
of this was NOx. There is another picture that is very similar to what we have shown
you earlier.
Now, I am not talking in terms of theů. It is a reverse. Same thing. Here, we are plotting
air to fuel ratio and in, we were talking about the equivalence ratio. Equivalence ratio
will be something like reciprocal of the two ratios ľ af by and this. Again, this peaks
at this point. If I have to plot stoichiometry, where will be the stoichiometry? Will the
stoichiometry be on this side or this side?
You have to answer this. Stoichiometry has to be on which side? Left side. See the one
on the top. That is stoichiometry because equivalence ratio is (fuel to air ratio)actual
divided by (fuel to air ratio)stoichiometry. If it is 1, it means we are at stoichiometry.
You see here on this side, in terms of the air to fuel ratio, as we go on putting more
and more air, then NOx formation is more and more. Then why does it decrease? It is because
although there is more nitrogen and more oxygen, your mixture is becoming so lean that the
temperatures that you are getting are not very high. When the temperatures are not high,
it will tend to decrease because you need both temperature as well as excess oxygen.
Very funny but very very important graph.
It is the same thing and it is more of a mechanism for the formation. This is the same graph
that we need to understand. It is showing both NO and NOx. You see here largely it is
NO. Very small amount of NOx can be formed depending on the equivalence ratio that you
have. Then as you are increasing the equivalence ratio, it will peak until 0.9 or so and then,
this will come down. Let us talk about the unburned. We are not talking about the control
ľ we will talk about control in the next class but let us talk about the hydrocarbons.
In the engine, emissions of unburned hydrocarbon come from the raw unburned fuel because some
fuel can escape unburned, fuel that did not burn all the way to CO2 and H2O. Some might
just escape as such. Some might escape ľ they are converted into something else but
hydrocarbon but did not burn because you start with some hydrocarbon and they are the intermediate
oxidation of the fuel that can take place.
You started with let us say methane. Some may burn directly and some may convert something
likeů and then, what you might find is that some might as unburned and you may find this
could not burn in the process. This was never in there but this might also be seen at the
exhaust. That is the difference between raw unburned and fuel that did not burn all the
way to CO2 and water. Lubricating oil is a serious problem. We all
use lubricating oil in engines, especially in two-stroke engines using the fuel plus
oil mixture. What happens is that in the two-stroke engine, if you recall, what we do is we put
the lubricating oil every time along with the fuel. I do not know if you recall it but
in old scooters, you would go and add 2 liters of petrol and 3 percent of that was lubricating
oil ľ you always add that from outside. In that case, you are adding the lubricating
oil especially in the two-stroke engine and sometimes, the lubricating oil causes a lot
of emissions because in the process, that can also get burned and can give out fumes.
Is anyone from Delhi here? Have you seen the petrol pumps in Delhi? Earlier, what people
were doing was that they would put the oil from outside, the lubricating oil. That may
be dirty or people had the tendency of using more oil. They think there should be better
lubrication, but you do not need more oil. More oil can lead to more problems. It can
be raw unburned fuel or it can be fuel that did not burn all the way to CO and H2O. There
could be lubricating oil because of the two-stroke engine ľ those emissions are more because
people put more and more lubricating oil. Then, other than the tailpipe which are more
or less these thingsů. I was giving the example in Delhi. In Delhi, they have banned that
you cannot put the lubricating oil from outside. There is a dispensing machine along with the
petrol machine. The petrol delivery pump you put this and then it will dispense the exact
amount of the lubricating fuel in there. You cannot buy it from outside.
Other than the tailpipe, there are crankcase fumes that can come out, fuel tank ľ older
cars did not have any evaporative emission control system, filling stations in regions
without second hose to recover the gas tank vapors and we also know that tires give a
lot of organic vapors, but that is not from the combustion sources. It may be a good idea
that I do not leave you thinking. We might talk about this a little bit latter but I
want to give you a little feel of the emissions here ľ the crankcase fumes.
This is a piston and this is inside the cylinder. At the piston, what do you find? A round thing?
You always find piston rings are there. The piston is here and the piston rings. Not a
very good picture. What is the role of piston rings? To keep it tight. They are a little
flexible. They can press and then, they will expand themselves so that it becomes a little
fixed. What happens when you have the piston rings here?
As the engine gets old, there is wear and tear of everything. Of course, there are two
metal parts hitting each other all the time. What happens with this? This thing is worn
out and the piston rings are also worn out. As a result, when you have the expansion stroke
or power stroke, there is a huge pressure here and because of this pressure, which is
very high here, because of the wear and tear, even before it burns or is partially burned,
the hydrocarbon can come out from the space here and then come out in the crankcase. This
can also come from this side. Obviously once this comes out, there is no way that you can
burn it. These are called the crankcase emissions or more popularly known as blow-by emissions.
Combustion engineers or IC engine people will be experts on everything but we need to know
at the air pollution level what are these emissions and why these crankcase emissions
can be of huge significance. We will talk about the control of this maybe in the next
class, but in most of the control that they do, the blow-by emissions are recaptured and
recycled in the car only. But at least now, you know that this is what we were referring
to ľ crankcase fumes (older engines without crankcase gas recycling). If you can recycle
these emissions back in there, we are more or less handling the situation but if you
do not, then these emissions occur. Therefore, we say that for old cars, we say
that you must get the engine done well, the maintenance is very important. Sometimes,
the old engines can go so bad that that there is a government regulation that engines more
than 15 years old should go out of business, because these emissions can become very very
significant. This will be the emissions of hydrocarbons. You can also see the fuel tank
emission ľ maybe we will talk a little later about the fuel tank.
But if you have a car (I do not know how good or bad the car looks), if this is the front,
you have the light on this side and then you will have the fuel tank here. When they fill
this, the petrol is up to here. As you are filling, the pressure here builds up and then
there leakage starts. This is called as the evaporation losses in the tank. This can occur
all the time ľ it is not only when you are filling it up. That time, it is more because
you have opened the valve and that is the time the emissions are more, but this occurs
all the time ľ there will be some leakages. Even if there are no leakages, you can seeů.
In a petrol vehicle, where is this fuel taken through the fuel pump? It is taken to the
carburetor. Of course, the new technologies have changed but in the old thing, you have
the carburetor. The carburetor vaporizes this and then you mix the oxygen with that. Even
if your pipeline is open, the fuel is going to your carburetor and this engine is hot,
the fuel continues to go there and then this is the liquid but it can evaporate from here
and there could be constant emissions from here. There can be just evaporation unless
the whole thing is cooled off and there can emissions. Some people say that in earlier
scooters, the moment you are off the scooter, then you switch this off so that at least
this thing does not go anywhere. But now what people are doing is (we will
probably see this in the next class) that they are able to recapture these vapors and
put them back in there so that you can completely recycle. We will probably see a line diagram
because you should know and have an idea of the latest things that people are doing. I
do not know if you have notice that as you are driving, they say your car is showing
the empty kind of thing. Then, you stop somewhere for half an hour or one hour and this slightly
goes back and it seems as if you have more petrol in your car.
This is all captured by the operations. It is very complicated. The amount of research
and development that has gone into cars, I think there is no other machine where changes
or technology have so many efforts ľ from the comfort to combustion, from air-conditioning
to heating and then adjustment of the seats. Sometimes, the seats have four or five motors
so that you can adjust it back and forth. Everything is there. Otherwise if you do not
have these, there will be very significant emissions from theů. Filling stations, of
course, have to have some system that they can capture even at the filling stations.
We will see the sources of hydrocarbon that comes. We will do this and you really need
to pay attention. This is a very interesting and useful figure. What I am trying to do
is that I am running the engine, I am trying to see what is happening in the exhaust. I
am running the engine let us say for different conditions of the air to fuel ratio and trying
to look at three important things ľ carbon monoxide, hydrocarbon and NOx.
Their concentration can definitely look very very different. Be careful about the units.
CO is in percentage, hydrocarbon is in ppm ľ it can even be more and then NOx is again
in ppm. Thanks to ľ he has put this animation into this. For example, our stoichiometry
is here. I have put my engine on and then you see this here. In this region, I am not
putting enough of oxygen. I will have a lot of CO, which can be of the order of 5 percent
or so. We have some measurement of CO. Sometimes, we have found CO up to 8 percent in old Ambassador
cars of '70s. You see that here. As you supply more and more oxygen almost up to stoichiometry,
you see the emissions are quite. Fair enough, simple thing but then the CO emissions will
reduce depending upon where you are. Look at the hydrocarbon. Now we are in the
measurements of ppm. Again, what you are doing is you are putting more and more hydrocarbon.
The hydrocarbon is reducing because you are able to burn more and more hydrocarbon, but
it does not really go very low like CO because the emissions can vaporize before it can burn
ľ something like blow-by or something. These emissions can continue to happen and they
may reduce at this point to minimum but it does not go so low also. There is a little
tendency here that it may go up. Why? It is because now, there is not enough of
the fuel ľ not able to burn; chances of the unburned fuel also escaping become larger
and larger here. You do not have enough things to burn. In fact, even if you go so low below
20 or so, you may not even be able to fire because you have made your mixture very very
lean. If you have made it very very lean, then hydrocarbon might just escape because
you are not even able to burn. This side also, you may not be able to burn anything if you
have just the fuel and not the oxygen. These are the two extremes. Your engine cannot
operate beyond this and the engine cannot operate beyond this. So you see hydrocarbon
emissions will continue to be there ľ it does not go to 0 so easily. Obviously, we
have discussed a lot about NOx. As you go higher air to fuel ratio, something like this,
it will peak here and the equivalence ratio will be close to 0.9. We have also explained
the reasons as to why the NO or NOx for that matter will come down. If you are operating
your engine somewhere here, there is a lot of emissions that we have.
I have explained to you earlier and that also is very clear. We will complete this, do not
worry. Water is being produced. I can also show how the water will change. This water
will change something like this ľ increase, increase, it will go up to here and then,
this water will decrease. Why will it decrease? Water also you can think in terms of the pressure.
Why would the water decrease? It is because of the simple dilution effect. You have more
and more air. These are all concentration units. So it will peak up to there and after
that, I am drawing in more air and the air to fuel ratio is becoming higher. The concentration
will decrease. The mass is probably the same. In fact, mass is the same but the concentration
decreases because I am putting more and more air.
You see here, it will probably decrease. There is no dilution for the oxygen but at some
point, oxygen shouldů. Will it continue to rise ľ the concentration of the oxygen? At
some point, it will stabilize to the atmospheric oxygen. It will be in percentage. Maybe if
I go a little bit more on this side, this becomes stable. Agreed? So I can draw this.
Before we go to the next slide, normally, my petrol vehicles operate somewhere close
to here. It means I am really supplying less oxygen because you want the good pickup and
so on. If I ask you what are the issues with petrol
engines, your answer will be carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons and not so much of NOx. Do
you agree or you disagree?
Sorry, carbon monoxide.No, if you come this side somewhere here, you will see that the
carbon monoxide is again in percentage. It is not small ľ 1.5 to 2 percent. These units
are in percentage. Let us see the issue in the relative sense. If I am operating my engine
somewhere here, then I am likely to get a huge amount of hydrocarbon, huge amount of
CO for that matter (in the relative sense) and not so much of NO. Agreed? Look at how
the two engines will give you different emissions. As I operate on the diesel side somewhere
here, I get a lot of power, I get a lot of energy, I can drive huge trucks and I can
drive huge locomotives. You see here that hydrocarbon may not be so much of a problem.
If you go and measure in the diesel truck, you will not get any CO but what will you
get? Huge NOx. NOx is a serious problem in the diesel engine.
The other thing is smoke ľ the smoke from the diesel engine. We will talk about that
maybe in the next class, but you can see how with this little knowledge of stoichiometry,
we can deal properly with the petrol-driven vehicles and diesel-driven vehicles. We can
set standards for petrol-driven vehicles. For petrol-driven vehicles, you set the standard
that all NOx should be less than this. Where is the problem?
NOx should be they will say all happily, but then, you have to set the standard for CO
and hydrocarbon for petrol vehicles. In fact if you see the regulations Euro 1, Euro 2,
Bharat I, Bharat IIů. You are all aware of Bharat I, Bharat II, Bharat III. Bharat I,
Bharat II and Bharat III for petrol-driven vehicles, then they will say for CO and hydrocarbon.
Bharat II and III for diesel-driven vehicles. Then it will be largely about smoke because
diesel produces smoke ľ we have not discussed that in the class but there is huge amount
of NOx. I do not think that we have a summary here. What else is drawn? CO2. CO2. Have we
done CO2? Where is the CO2 going?
This one? That also should correspond with the CO. Decreasing CO2 will increase obviously
and after some time, what will happen is that because ofů. These are all the dilution effect.
More oxygen, more air so that will ů. This is one important thing that we learned today.
Something more?.
Summary of the figure 1. summary. We got it wrong here ľ there is not so much of hydrocarbon,
which a little comparatively.NOx is the highest, soot is low here and hydrocarbon is low here.
Sometimes, hydrocarbons can be more in the diesel engine because you are going up and
you try to push more and more fuel, which cannot even burn; that can come out. We will
stop here.