Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
I would offer a small apologue for saying of this pathologic condition.
This is the story of a COO of a big company that have had an invitation to a concert in which was played among others the Shubert’s Symphony No. 8, “the unfinished”.
The CEO could not go, so he turned the invitation to the Head of Human Resources.
He was a young graduate of the Bocconi University, with Masters at the London School, which also dealt with politics, asking for efficiency and for a youth politics, which went to the concert.
The day after the COO asked the Chief of HR if he had liked the concert and he received the surprising answer that at noon would have had a report on his desk.
At noon received the report and started to read the content, which was divided into five sections:
1) During substantial periods of time, the four oboes don't do anything,
it should be minimized the number and distributed the work among the rest of the orchestra so to eliminate peaks of ustilization;
2) The 12 violins play the same note, the staff of violinists should be drastically reduced
3) It isn’t of any utility that the brass repeats sounds that are already been performed by the strings
4) If such redundant passages were eliminated, the concerto could be reduced by one quarter
5) If Shubert had taken account of these remarks, he had finished symphony
I want to live in a world where we can continue to hear the Shubert's symphony as is