Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
What kind of warhead would the missile have?
It was a standard warhead for this missile, a half megaton thermonuclear warhead.
Because this missile is the only nuclear missile.
There is no ordinary warhead for this missile.
It can only be nuclear, and it was nuclear.
A thermonuclear warhead. Thermonuclear.
It was launched from somewhere in the Atlantic,
at the Pentagon buildings and arrives.
Yes.
In your opinion, that's the only explanation.
Yes.
This is the explanation of the mechanics of the Pentagon attack,
and also of the behavior of the US government.
It explains everything. OK.
We'll come to the origins of the missile.
Because in your book, you disclose where it comes from,
when and how it got to be in the hands
of people that wanted to attack United States.
But let's talk for a second about the total events, the chronology.
within 45 minutes, two explosions,
they say planes hitting, you say explosions, the WTC.
A missile attack on Washington.
And a short time after that,
a plane landing in--crashing in Shanksville Pennsylvania.
What do you say happened after the Pentagon attack?
This is a little bit complicated story.
Because in order to understand this,
you have to understand first about the demolition scheme of the WTC. OK.
Otherwise it will not be easy to explain.
Let's do it this way.
You had intimate knowledge because of your job in the Russian military
of specific peaceful arrangements for the WTC.
Yes, in the Soviet Union,
there was a knowledge of inbuilt nuclear demolition idea of the WTC.
Let's call it nuclear demolition scheme, if that's correct,
as I call it in my book.
I don't know from which year the Soviet nuclear intelligence knew about it.
But as myself, I knew it something like first time 1984, I guess.
So in 1984 I knew already that
Twin Towers of the WTC has a demoliton feature based on the nuclear device.
What would be the purpose of that?
As far as I understand, the story is like this.
The building code of New York in the 60s,
and as well as the building code of Chicago,
were different from the rest of the building codes of America.
They did not allow the constructor to build any skyscraper
unless the constructor can provide in advance some demolition idea.
meaning how he is going to demolish that building in the future.
So the department of building of New York
would never issue permission to build the incredibly strong WTC Twin Towers,
unless the people who propose the construction
would propose also the demolition scheme.
And because it's absolutely impossible to demolish
such a strong and rigid structure as the Twin Towers,
especially back in the 60s.
It was really a big problem for the constructor.
So they don't know how to demolish it.
They know how to build it, but they don't know how to demolish it.
So at this time, they hired one famous company
Nuclear Demolition Inc.
Sorry, Controlled Demolition Inc.
which actually deserve to be the name I guess.
Maybe a freudian slip. Yes.
So they hired the most famous demolition company
Controlled Demolition Inc. based in America
to figure out some demoliton scheme for the would-be WTC still back in the 60s.
And because at this time--you know the nuclear bombs they become evil now.
But in the 60s they were still OK.
I mean it was acceptable to use them for civil purposes as well.
And the Controlled Demolition Inc. proposed the idea
that if they plant the underground nuclear device under each of the tower,
and detonate it, it will cause the collapse of the building,
without actually damaging the surrounding.
And this scheme was accepted by the department of building.
So the permission to build the WTC was issued.
So they built WTC with this kind of thing,
It was a building feature from the beginning.
How would the Russian intelligence know about it.
The first of all, there was an agreement
which is called "Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Treaty"
between the Soviet Union and the United States of America.
And in this agreement, they have limitation and mutual obligations
in regard to so called peaceful nuclear explosions.
So, according to this agreement,
each side have to inform another side of any peaceful nuclear explosions.
So I guess that the Soviet nuclear intelligence was informed based on that treaty.
And... In any case, this was not a secret.
I remember that it was published in some newspapers even.
I remember that there was a discussion in some American newspapers
in regarding to the nuclear demoliton scheme of the WTC in--
I think in the beginning of 80s.
They just forgot now, but before it was publicly available.
And the Sears Tower in Chicago.
Yes, the Sears Tower in Chicago has the same kind of feature,
also designed by the Controlled Demolition Inc.
OK, to a layman, it does seem mad, frankly,
here we have the WTC with thousands people live and work,
surrounded by other places where people live and work,
that there might be a nuclear device underneath, standing by to be used,
in case it requires demoliton.
That does seem to the layman quite mad!
Would it be a safe thing to do?
Look, it doesn't only look mad for the layman.
It also looks mad for the Soviet nuclear intelligence.
Because??? it was a standing joke amongst our officers.
It was such a crazy thing that I give you one example.
In the middle of Bangkok, there was a big supermarket which was also called WTC.
Nowadays it's renamed.
They don't want the people to remember the words.
But back in the 90s, it was still a WTC.
So, there was a funny story.
I visited Bangkok in 1992, while still in the military,
with one of my colleagues, from the same service.
When we were passing in the taxi by the world trade center in Bangkok.
The taxi driver point it to us that this is the world trade center.
Both of us began to laugh.
So I ask my colleague why you are laughing.
He said, he know that I'm just figuring out how many kiloton
of the nuclear explosion would I need to demolish the world trade center.
It was really like a crazy idea, it's really a mad idea.
But it was, otherwise they cannot get the permission to build it.
But there must have been a reason for Peaceful Nuclear Demolition Treaty
to be agreed between the Russians and the Americans,
the Russians must have had similar arrangements
for peaceful use of nuclear technology.
First of all, this is--what you call a Peaceful Nuclear Demolition Treaty
is a Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Treaty.
It has nothing to do with the demolition.
So, peaceful nuclear explosions in the Soviet Union,
They were never used for demoliton of anything.
They were primarily used for making artificial lakes,
canals, tunnels, and gas holders.
Because it's a perfect thing to make a gas holder, for example.
When you detonate a nuclear explosion deep underground,
it will creat a cavity with hermetic walls,
which is represented by volcanic glass.
And it is a perfect thing to keep gas under pressure. Yes.
So like for example, in the Soviet Union,
the most of the peaceful usage of the nuclear explosion
was to create the gas holders.
But Americans they decided to use it for demoliton.
And not tell the public. Of course not.
But even though they did not tell the public, it was publicly available.
Because I remember there was a scandal in the beginning of 80s.
Because some guy who worked at the WTC,
he accidentally discovered a blue print
of the nuclear demoliton scheme in the library.
And he complained to some newspaper.
It was really a scandal, I remember it.