Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
letter yours alan even the militant moderate once again this is the oasis
for those who have an aversion to the left right black-white two-dimensional
broach covered up other things out of the g_o_p_ comes a two point five
trillion dollar proposal to cut spending let the fighting began i say also
i think boy talk about it anil unavoidable nepal
whole white governor neil have a problem cannot locate the document he said
would prove all bomb a citizenship
no wife table width given the brothers on this one disguises although
this was completely
unilateral in its
foot shooting
gloria is completely unilateral
anne what we have a for us all for the show david packard liberal host of the
internationally syndicated radio t_v_ program a david packard show heard it
over one hundred and twenty cities and towns on directv network anna david
pacman dot comhi is singularly the finest toll coast in the world at least
that's what his family says david abbey back
we prefer that it wasn't
i'll leave the house republican study committee
has this plan to cut spending
and i guess hopefully by extension the national debt by two point five trillion
dollars over the next ten years now
it will come out of discretionary spending meaning that the fence and
entitlement programs would not be vulnerable
when the question to you
while this approach
granted only addresses ninety percent of the budget
isn't the kind of beginning
most plausible simply because
it removes what is most loathsome to democrats know cutting entitlements as
well as what's most objectionable to republicans cutting defense which isn't
no i don't think this is not the right way to go i was disappointed iraqis i
was happy early finally
the what indicate that republicans want to cut it was impossible to make heads
or tails out of it from the pre-election interviews
uh... now that we've seen for example that amtrak subsidies are going to be
cut right would be lecturing behind in in rail already that's really going to
help
that the idea of utm under not funding nine hundred million dollars per
healthcare won't stop you right there with the and traci wright in texas is
easily cutting one point six billion per year
but unlike the post office where constitutionally required to keep this
sucker going i mean at one point or another enterprise like this should be
allowed to should have to meet the solvency standards
necessary to justify its existence now i think we can point to every area which
we might want to have a cot
as having a little more reason not to cut
but these are the these in the times in which we have to accept the dynamics of
competing interests wherein unless we choose the least of multiple evils
the worst evil could choose itself is not fair to say
it looks a bit com whether the constitution mandates that we shipped up
fund amtrak or not is not a question that the question of logic and if we are
going to talk about logic china
now is going to reap the benefits of the there
solar panel manufacturer in the u_s_
there kat they're going to china so robert behind and try and put behind the
alternative energy logic i think you need be involved in in the decision
out let me let me let me was amazed by you get some specific responses
the community development fund
four point five billion euro canada
aram yadav scrapping all that we can just come up with a lot of work
i think it's more important why don't you think of what you're going to usage
in in may be on that right
i'm giving him a party how about intercity in high-speed rail grants two
point five billion a year
bipin we have to believe that
or so you know that's unknown
architects subsidies you're really you know on that
absolutely
okay but wait a minute what about the fact that their operating least phele
and at what point does it become incumbent upon them to maybe start
pulling in their own belt just as the president expects the rest of us to
yet you know i i wish i spoke with michael dukakis who was on the board of
amtrak and we talked about the this tactic jack-booted amtrak is not
profitable on its own
the reality is
the government is i've believed going to need to help get that pointed same
argument which solar panels right now the government thirty-two exposed itself
as being grotesquely incompetent when it comes to financial management
let addresses that let's not just say we are going to bal do do do come on and
that's right way to do that's like you when i go to the k_k_k_ for
enlightenment on affirmative action
i mean i don't know what i want to the wrong source are we not at what point
does it become uncommon upon these institutions
to start functionally functioning successfully
acting the k_k_k_ comparison is nonsense i'm just trying to even get a word in
edgewise scared my point is
yeah everything that's a look at all and the argument is
right now
it cost too much to make a solar panel relative to how much energy we can do
right by agree with you one other than i did and i think it was it was about one
two thousand going to support houses
hudson truckers were interact with solar panels
needs a lot of form of maturity people to be calm pork
financially a viable
panels i can understand yeah i know that uh... you are in agreement a lot a lot
of this a lot of the new
conforms of energy renewable energy a lot of the a lot of the green energy
right now cost more then it generates in profit so which seems regressive and
unfair to hold it to that standard because it really is going through
evolutionary chair challenges but amtrak's a different story
they can't use the excuse of
wanting maternity as a justification for not being able to run as a successful
businesses that agree with me there
my quiet there would be best
how how amtrak possibly be profitable when it's going sixty miles an hour on
outdated track from where i live in aptitude in new york impart impart
because politicians from the midwest who have been low population density areas
can't city putting money into developing train good and i don't really have the
population to warrant it we're never going to move forward on that we can
fundamentally changed but nothing that you had said
recognizes the need
for this
uh... entity to execute some greater capacity for self appraisal you've got
some pretty swollen pension plans
you got some amazing of packages it sold as is it
they've become a privileged workforce it's almost as if really where where
were incentivize ng incompetence by waving accountability because these guys
know that they ten year after year after year prove themselves insolvent it
doesn't matter cuz opal sam will pick up the slack
by not telling you don't see any credibility in that observance
i am of hundred percent behind the idea that if we need to shake up management
if we can make other changes let's make them but let's not take all the money
away from anything that you were were already embarrassingly behind in the
world
where embarrassingly behind not that not because the government because this
business disabled functions as a business
then go ahead and put some stipulations that will change that i'm fine with that
i'm not saying we need to continue running at the exact same where what i
think if we can't afford to be funded and by the way when i made the analogy
with the k_k_k_ i'm just saying
you don't go to was source that is the direct it at this is for the very thing
you're trying to accomplish
the government has shown itself in breathtaking clarity
simply on able to reconcile their books and prove a budget just as they take a
carriers obviously comported themselves in the fashion
that is completely devoid of any racial sensitivity you have folks who are being
preventable pond to help out with a task that they've never had a track record
public t_v_
add to that degree i think it's goodbyes to go to folks who've already proven
they don't know what they're talking about
in the area of focus to which we refer to cook stick with us got more with the
packwood you all with that alignment radio network are melanie