Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
[music]
We're in the Prado, in Madrid,
and we're looking at Albrecht Dürer's self-portrait from 1498,
where he shows himself, for me, almost like a dandy.
He painted this when he was 26,
and that's what the inscription says below the window.
You can see that he's proud of his looks,
and proud of his clothes, and mostly,
proud of how he could paint.
It's so interesting, because he is creating himself here.
But he's representing himself not only in terms of his likeness,
not only in terms of the class that he's aspiring to,
not only in terms of his representation of his own aesthetics,
in terms of his choice of costume,
but he's representing himself as a painter as well, right?
As a craftsman, as somebody who is extraordinarily capable.
And yet at the same time, he's also negating that very ability
by rendering himself not in the guise of an artist, of a workman,
but wearing actually incredibly expensive kid gloves,
and very much not in a workshop environment,
but as if he were a nobleman.
Right. I mean, it's important to remember that when an artist paints a self-portrait,
he's actually probably looking in a mirror,
and you know, he's got paint, you know,
he's got brushes in his hands, and he's in his studio, and he's painting.
So there's a real conscious decision to remove those things,
and to show himself in another way.
And so the hands are completely fabricated.
And yet, in some ways, this is still very much, for me,
tied to his identity as an artist.
I think he's not only representing himself,
but he's representing his abilities, in a sense,
a kind of portfolio piece.
Laying claim to art as something that is intellectual.
Ah, see! That's the key, right?
This notion that painting is in fact, as you said, an intellectual activity -
not just the work of the craftsman, of the cabinetmaker.
Exactly. But something which happens in the artist's mind,
and therefore worthy of a different kind and level of respect.
And I think that's very much here.
[music]