Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
a
today
i'd see signs
bc in the
disaster movies
where the road starts cracking
the whole purpose fitting in
i don't pay since israeli said this to me before i don't know why would ever be
surprised by this
for the democrats i can
feel that man i could feel it in the stores is popping out at me
there about that
possibly
the greatest collapsed
of all time
that they can get it but is it what what
how could it be everyday events omitting his support collapses
well they might be a correct
let's hook ups let me give you the details of what's happening with
and democrats have gone a couple iron
notes mobilized
that pat fish ill nor do i made history say and i resubmitted republicans were
clueless
now the reality
now he also told politico quote the issues that won't work but willing to do
is what the republicans are willing to
that's exactly right
because the democrats
for cattle dairy then take it into your browser
so the issue is in the democrats though
doug abandoned all give in and they want
that the other
any and all circumstances
your issuers whether republicans
decided it
even though by the way the democrats controlled two-thirds of government
they could go white house and the senate
but harry concedes doesn't matter what we think four years old as the republic
fantastic greg so lets get started
well look uh... it turns out that the body parts of already identified one
point five to one point seven trillion dollars
in cuts that was a lot of numbers floating out there at one point order
future etcetera
it turns out it's right in that one point five one four seven trillion
odd number that's jagadics
and excited two point four trillion
so already
two-thirds of the cuts
uh... or how will balance the budget comes from spending cuts none for
revenue yet
they feel like i don't think there's a one-third that's pretty bad it should be
okay maybe we live with it
believing that a third is just going to be
increasing revenue
no thirty is now we're being told
avonex uh... revenue increases
as a more spending cuts
so well
but making the ratios every much much worse
is another fun part apparently when these negotiations began politicos
reporting and i think they're accurate on this as far as i can tell from other
sources well
uh... that president obama of when dead negotiations began said
approximately sixty billion dollars of
revenue increases on the table whether it's closing tax loopholes subsidies
etcetera etcetera
as polo ponies or do you picked from this list and let's get to reasonable
first while insulate travel negotiation
what you do is
shakir seven sixty billion dollars in cuts that we demand a
that of the republican all the time right miserable cuss they have it
revenue increase a she said the bones of reduced so far
so wanted apresentava i'm a deal of course is usually does
he got a from seven hundred sixty billion the four hundred so there goes
that is exhibiting dot right
now either republics of the four hundred billion of course not
so what happens next well you just get smaller
exam seven loving opposes reporting ideas a headline
democrats that nuestro lines after mcconnell reaffirms position
the tax revenues
in-depth view
meeting mcconnell came out and i believe it was just reset
i'm not gonna give you anything
there will be no tax increases not
and i told you if you saying that
he thinks
my god
you might be able to get a deal
with its only spending cuts
and he thinks he's
close enough
that he can come out publicly say that
his remember p greece lewis
tax-increases a couple days later
user workflow looks right cuz it looks like he went back to his wife
that's going to have with the tea party
i think the complex all my god these democrats
solve week
so pathetic
i might be able to get one hundred percent of what i want
so that's why some present clear on that and
now the new number being offered
this perhaps
two hundred billion
in taxes
so that would make the ratio
to point two trillion in spending cuts two hundred billion
revenue tax increases whatever you want to call
that would be a female lab in to one ratio
first of all
justice and common sense dictate
that he should be
at least
one-by-one
that's fed that make sense
level one do really painful spending cuts that's going to hurt
the poor the milk last sale badly
but okay we've got a budget probably let's do it ok and i got my first exam
m_s_n_b_c_ a greater that
before you realize what it was agreed to
is no one did you
the same amount of tax increases the rich and the corporations financially or
otherwise subsidies that sarah
that's not the president obama start
he said his commission said and he said in his speech
that it would be three oh one
three times a spending cuts as taxing reasons why why why
well this because
but again we don't know whether excessive negotiation
or he just is playing with the other side in when good cop bad cop right so
here we go again
now that three oh one was the starting point now that might be at the eleven oh
one
facet of attitude
uh... operative in
uh... washington
well waiting about that he says that's not shared sacrifice democrat should be
shamed into of themselves
but they go along with a plan that undermines the quill priorities
democrats up brockport in last fifty years
fifty years we were fighting for that but the last time you saw democrats
fighting for quote priorities
they have a good student duties
republican parties i do you think
says that there's a new new plan
but that uh... it just gets you get a lot of
joe lieberman so you know it's that billy berman has come out with tom
coburn
a so-called bipartisan plan
bipartisan about
who think charlie was a democrat
these are the most hard-core republican senate
so they have been really come up with a plan
i had to fix the problem here
highly offensive
fight cutting medicare
bike six hundred and
forty billion dollar
and none of these are not cuts
the hospitals of the drug companies aren't anything like that
ninety five percent of the cuts would go towards beneficiary
that means you are
that's the middle class
and that's what many fibers so if that's
they're cutting medicare
so another fellow democrats or not it's ok
uh... tax increases whatsoever
will cause the difference are blue
two point four trillion that we demanded
by cutting medicare more that way you can attack as politically
for wanting to cut medicare cuz you signed off on cutting medicare
and will get there by the middle class even more
and the ritual pay moulin of their share
none
and that is a plan apparently
being considered
in watch
it makes me wanna bonnet mammy looked
you raise your timings from six five six seven out-of-pocket deductibles up to
five hundred fifty dollars
you would raise your premiums
and the list goes on an on it is growth
so now the possibilities are
that the democrats in a best case scenario take about
two hundred billion dollars in tax increases day
and other possibility is by the date philip everything was just medicare cuts
which dessert
that would be the collapse both
historic proportions i don't mean in the u_s_ i mean in world history
great any at all records
for disastrous negotiation
and then finally one other possibilities
they do it but short term view that doesn't cover the whole two point four
trillion
and what they do is
only take the spending cuts
and begin
zero on the tax side
zero the revenue side
so i i twelve i think it was about one point six
trillion in spending cuts will take it would send for a little bit more
and then as elections come will be chocolate again
and then we will get more spending cuts because the democrats for the worse
negotiators if that's what they're doing
in the history of the war
it makes me not want to cover this stuff
sygate manifold should the whole thing for