Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
OLBERMANN: Finally, as promised, special comments on the remarks yesterday by Secretary of State
Rice. We already know about her suggestion that the president could just ignore whatever
congressional Democrats do about Iraq. Just ignore Congress? We know how that game always
turns out. Ask President Nixon, ask President Andrew Johnson.
But about what the secretary said regarding the prospect of Congress revising or repealing
the 2002 authorization of the war in Iraq, and here we go again. From Springs spent trying
to link Saddam Hussein, to Summers of cynically manipulated intelligence, through Autumns
of false patriotism, to winters of war, we have had more than four years of every cheap
trick and every degree of calculated cynicism from an administration filled with Three Card
Monty players.
But the longer Dr. Rice and these other pickpocket of the nation's goodness have walked among
us, waving flags and slandering opponents, and making true enemies, foreign and domestic,
all hat and no cattle all the while, the overriding truth of their occupancy of our highest offices
of state has only gradually become clear. As they asked once in the Avis commercial,
ever get the feeling some people just stop trying?
Secretary Rumsfeld thought he could equate those who doubted him with Nazi appeasers,
without reminding everybody that the actual historical Nazi appeasers in this country
in the 1930's were the Republicans. Vice President Cheney thought he could talk as if he, and
he alone, knew the truth about Iraq and 9/11, without anyone ever noticing that even the
rest of the administration officially disagreed with him. The president really acted as if
you could scare all the people all the time, and not lose your soul and your congressional
majority as a result.
But Secretary of State Rice may have now taken the cake. On the Sunday morning interview
show of broken record on Fox, Dr. Rice spoke a paragraph which, if it had been included
in a remedial history paper at the weakest high school in the nation, would have gotten
the writer an F, maybe an expulsion: "if Congress were now to revise the Iraq authorization,"
she said, out loud, with an adult present, quote, "it would be like saying that after
Adolf Hitler was overthrown, we needed to change then the resolution that allowed the
United States to do that, so that we could deal with creating a stable environment in
Europe after he was overthrown."
The secretary's resume reads that she has a master's degree and PHD in political science.
The interviewer should have demanded to see them on the spot. Dr. Rice spoke 42 words.
She may have made more mistakes in them than did the president in his State of the Union
Address in 2003. There is obviously no mistaking Saddam Hussein for a human being, but nor
is there any mistaking him for Adolf Hitler. Invoking the German dictator, who subjugated
Europe, who tried to exterminate the Jews, who sought to overtake the world, is not just
in the poorest of tastes, but it is hyperbole.
It insults not merely the victims of the Third Reich, but also those in this country who
fought it and who defeated it. Saddam Hussein was not Adolf Hitler, and George W. Bush is
not Franklin D. Roosevelt, nor Dwight D. Eisenhower. He isn't even George H.W. Bush, who fought
in that war.
However, even through the clouds of deliberately spread fear, and even under the weight of
1,000 exaggerations of the five years past, one can just barely make out how a battle
against international terrorism in 2007 could be compared by some to the Second World War.
The analogy is weak. It instantly begs the question of why those of the greatest generation
focused on Hitler and Hirohito, but our leaders of today seem to have ignored their vague
parallels of today, to instead concentrate on the Mussolinis of modern terrorism.
But in some small, you didn't fail junior, but you may need to go to summer school kind
of way you can just make out that comparison. But Secretary Rice, overthrowing Saddam Hussein
was akin to overthrowing Adolf Hitler? Are you kidding? Did you want to provoke the world's
laughter? And please, madam secretary, if you are going to make that most implausible,
dubious, subjective, ridiculous comparison, if you want to be as far off the mark about
the Second World War as, say, this pathetic Holocaust denier from Iran, Ahmadinejad, at
least get the easily verifiable facts right, the facts honed through history. Lie in your
own department.
The resolution that allowed the United States to overthrow Hitler, on the 11th of December,
1941, at 8:00 in the morning, two of Hitler's diplomats walked up to the State Department,
your office, Secretary Rice, and 90 minutes later, they were handing a declaration of
war to the chief of the department's European division. The Japanese had bombed Pearl Harbor
four days earlier, and the Germans simply piled on.
Your predecessors, Dr. Rice, did not spend a year making up phony evidence, and mistaking
German balloon inflating trucks for mobile germ warfare labs. They didn't pretend the
world was ending, because a tin pot tyrant could not hand over the chemical weapons it
turned out he had destroyed a decade earlier.
The Germans walked up to the front door of our State Department and said, we're at war.
It was in all the papers. And when that war ended, more than three horrible years later,
our troops and the Russian troops were in Berlin, and we stayed, as an occupying force,
well into the 1950's, as an occupying force, madam secretary.
If you want to compare what we did to Hitler, and in Germany, to what we did to Saddam,
and in Iraq, I'm afraid you're going to have to buy the whole analogy. We were an occupying
force in Germany, Dr. Rice. And by your logic, we are now an occupying force in Iraq. And
if that's the way you see it, you damn well better come out and tell the American people
so. Save your breath telling it to the Iraqis, most of them already buy that part of the
comparison.
"It would be like saying that after Adolf Hitler was overthrown, we needed to change,
then, the resolution that allowed the United States to do that, so that we could deal with
creating a stable environment in Europe after he was overthrown." We already have a subjectively
false comparison between Hitler and Saddam. We already have a historically false comparison
between Germany and Iraq. We already have blissful ignorance by our secretary of state
about how this country got into the war against Hitler. But then there's this part about changing
the resolution about Iraq, that it would be as ridiculous, in this secretary's eyes, as
saying that after Hitler was defeated, we needed to go back to Congress to deal with
creating a stable environment in Europe after he was overthrown.
Oh, good grief, Secretary Rice, that's exactly what we did do. We went back to Congress to
deal with creating a stable environment in Europe after Hitler was overthrown. It was
called the Marshall Plan, Marshall, General George Marshall, secretary of state, the job
you have now. Come on!
Twelve billion four hundred thousand dollars to stabilize all of Europe economically, to
keep the next enemies of freedom, the Russians, out and democracy in. How do you suppose that
happened? The president of the United States went back to Congress and asked it for a new
authorization and for the money. And do you have any idea, madam secretary, who opposed
him when he did that? The Republicans.
We have spent enough money in Europe, said Senator Taft of Ohio. We spent enough of our
resources, said former President Hoover. It's time to pull out of there. As they stand up,
we'll stand down. This administration has long thought otherwise, but you cannot cherry
pick life, whether life in 2007, or life in the history page marked 1945. You can't keep
the facts that fit your prejudices and throw out the ones that destroy your theories.
If you're going to try to do that, if you still want to fool some people into thinking
that Saddam was Hitler, and once we gave F.D.R. that blank check in Germany, he was no longer
subject to the laws of Congress or gravity or physics, at least stop humiliating us.
Get your facts straight. Use the Google.
You've been on Fox News Sunday, Secretary Rice. That network now has got another show
premiering tomorrow night. You could go on that one too. It might be a better fit. It's
called "Are You Smarter Than a Fifth Grader?"
That's Countdown. I'm Keith Olbermann, good night and good luck.