Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
We'd think: after the shocking event from September 11th, America was saved from any hypothetical assassin.
We would think...
But others thought something else:
Like; well, let's make use of the unexpected chance,
let us improve the occassion...
Yemen must be occupied, because the Al-Qaeda got a foothold there!...
Because the outlet of the Red Sea, like the Suez-Canal, Egypt, Sudan and Israel, their vessel traffic
and the Chinese tankers can all be controlled by here.
Because the loyal ally Saudi Arabia bewares of the Yemenian rebels.
And because a huge crude oil fields were found in Yemen!
They have to break into Yemen for that.
The "terrorist" is a great excuse.
It happened exactly what Patrick Kennedy said: as referenced by the department of foreign affairs on November 20th,
the secret services department asked the state department not to revoke the Nigerian young man's visa.
They did it for keeping an eye on- and roll up the whole criminal organisation. If that exists, of course.
After all, it'd be a believable, logical reasoning.
So the state dept. left his visa untouchable, while that American scholar holder was really preparing in that Yemenian camp.
And the secret services agents did such a good work by keeping their eyes on him,
that he could get onboard with a bomb under his clothes on the Christmas flight.
The detectors stood quiet, eventhough the security guards can see naked even the british queen.
They didn't find the bomb by searching,
eventhough they check everyone strictly in principle.
The American secret services monitored, tracked and they left him to get on the plane with his 'load'.
At the board meeting they argumented - they were waiting for him on the Detroit airport,
to catch and interrogate him.
But why did they have to wait till that?
Since they could had easily taken him into custody before the flight.
They also could had given an escort next to him, to keep him from doing that,
instead of the passengers, right on a Christmas flight by a divine inspiration.
But no. Men of the secret services would have waited for Abdulmutallab in America.
If it's true. Because if someone doesn't believe, can check it, if dares.
This is where the investigation has gone.
They wanted to prevent, they only messed it up - or they tried to make use of the attempt, for themselves.
Or by any chance did they - the secret agents - manage it?
This question has been occupied the minds of the thinkers since September 11th.
After September 11th, the indignation of the public opinion
made people to blot out the simmering economic and financial crisis.
It also empowered the White House to bomb Afghanistan and Iraq, to occupy them,
and the wars were supported also by the world's majority, or took note of it,
Albeit it got clear later, the Afghan Talibans successfully
confined the production of the primary commodity of drugs in Afghanistan, for instance.
Which is - by "our" support, blooming again and its world's biggest illegal exporter is the freed,
democratized, liberalized Afghanistan.
And we have to negotiate with the Talibans,
we pay the headmen for the peace, even if we could pay them without war, too.
And about Iraq; not long ago, even Tony Blair, the british ex-prime minister admitted:
the reasons to war were lies:
their weapons of mass destruction and its Al-Qaeda contact.
If the Christmas Detroit attempt would have succeeded, the simmering financial crisis of nowadays
- harder than the previous, escaped the notice,
and made possible the occupy of Yemen and Iran.
And, as it is known, the Iranian petroleum reserve is the second largest in the world.
Plus Nigeria, the assassin's homeland isn't also marginal.
It's a crude oil extraction gigant of Africa.
I mentioned Tony Blair: at the board meeting, that investigated the "September 11th",
the british ex-prime minister blamed the secret services, that they misinformed him.
Yes, but well, sometimes the secret services work like the dear buyer commands.
Saddam's weapon of mass destruction? "C'mon, just show them some vials.. Just show them the UN Security Council,
let's frighten with it the well-fed diplomats, whom got used to sit in comfortable seats.."
And voila, they just have the authorisation to attack!
Exactly this had been done by the ministry of foreign affairs right before the invasion of Iraq, if you remember.
And is anyone interested in this?
That how many people have died (and still dying) till today because of the lies?
Has anyone been punished for this?
Even the immemorial conventions of the international martial law specify,
it's the invader's role to keep the order and public safety in the land occupied by it.
Not only the terrorists, the rebels, the partisans, the guerillas, the resistants, the guilties.
Not only them are responsible. It's the army of occupation, that are also responsible.
But, the international troops are not capable to keep the order, public safety in Iraq, nor in Afghanistan.
And the fronts are still expanding.
The war with Iran is coming, which is more difficult than Iraq and Afghanistan together.
And then Pakistan. Which is more difficult to Iran, Iraq and Afghanistan together.
Plus, Pakistan holds even nuclear weapons. The question is: who will hold them, when we liberate it then?