Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
Although it’s covered with scientific loopholes
and it’s been getting more critics and adherents revolting against it.
yet, it’s still considered to be the cornerstone in the doctrine of the new atheism
"return to your Origin" youtube channel
Taseel Center for Research & Studies
All praise is due to Allah (God) and may peace and blessing be upon Muhammed -The Messenger of Allah-
One of the most controversial topics
and most sensitive in the whole atheistic issues
the issue of “Darwinian Evolution theory”
The dominant theory in the biological field
by receiving major acceptance in most scientific societies today
But, the important question now is:
Why eliminating –by force- all voices voting to criticize Darwinism?
Do Darwinists really defend “science”?!
Or rather “a faith and a doctrine”?
Let's see
Despite the diversity of the voices which are opposing Darwinism
To include evolutionary biologist,
prominent agnostics,
deified and believers
some atheists awkwardly insist to encapsulate all of the objections (regarding Darwinism) only as follows:
‘'Believers reject evolution only because it contradicts with their faith’'.
and the observed reality tells that,
when Darwinists present evolution to people
They do practice a kind of a “scientific deception”!
assisted by, the fact that
many people are “Passive recipients”
Blindly Trusting the integrity of the academic institutions, and the dominant media broadcasts today.
But, should we deny something that has been scientifically proven?
And why would you!
There is no argument over what has been scientifically proven
We are merely discussing what has not! my dear
Let’s explain
when we discuss evolution in general
Then, according to Dobzhansky, -a central figure in the field of evolutionary biology-
There are two types of evolution:
the one which takes place within the same species
it could be observed
also, it’s supported by great number of laboratory evidence
and faced no questioning whatsoever
The second type is:
An evolution that includes the claim of a common ancestor between different species
evolved from each other over millions of
years years years years years years years years
years years years years years years years years
years years years years years years years years
years years years years years years years years
millions of years
Linking mankind, flies, and bacteria!
This is Macro-evolution
or (General Theory of Evolution ) as some people call it
is the one we doubt and question, not the first type (Micro-evolution)
Why?
because it’s not scientifically proven
or I would say it's impossible for “Macro-evolution” to be appropriately proven according to the obvious Empirical Approach
without amending it.
Therefore, the evolutionary biologist
G.A. Kerkut
Explicitly says:
In addition, the best evidence provided by Darwinists
or at least Richard Dawkins
“Darwinists spokesman and expert”
To proof Macro-evolution
is the very striking similarity in the genetic codes of living organisms
Telling you: since there is a huge similarity in the
genetic codes
Then Macro-evolution is a “fact”!
"A FACT"
I wish that was the end of this story
However, this assumption is presented as an admissible fact!
Whoever disagrees with it shall be labeled with stupidly and ignorance!
even though it’s only an explanation doesn’t necessarily reflect the truth,
Nevertheless, there is another explanation, yet seems more rational, and logical
What is it?
''This striking similarity in the genetic code clearly indicates that the creator of all is one!''
but such explanation is the core of atheists’ hatred
even though all evidence indicate that
Listen...
Have you realized now that we are talking about dogma and unproven assumption
shared with people as a nonnegotiable fact
Taboo
and whoever stands against it, is considered as an ignorant and anti-science
Not to mention the ready charges of retrogression and reactionary
then finally, exclusion
Hence, you can comprehend the words of
Atheist and Darwinist professor Michael Ruse when he said:
A mere doctrine that some of its adherents took “godless churches”
in some of which '' The Origin of species'' is sacredly chanted
Finally, a Darwinist may object and say :
You said: we are practicing a “scientific deception”
my reply would be: '' I have no doubt about that''
So, In addition to what I have mentioned
I really wonder this level of deception done by Darwinists when it comes to explain the diversity of living organisms!
Darwinists induce the results of Microevolution
which is scientifically Proven
and astonishingly apply them to Macro-evolution
which is NOT scientifically Proven
to mislead the public in presenting evolution as if it’s only one type
Then, he or she (Darwinist) strikes you with this question:
If you don't believe in evolution, then why do you take medicines?
my answer would be: In the 1980
some of the world’s leading evolutionary biologists held a conference
at The Chicago Field Museum of Natural History
the central question was whether the mechanism underlying microevolution
can be extrapolated to explain the phenomena of macroevolution
so, what do you think the majority of answers to this question were?
Listen to SCIENCE magazine report
So, the matter is not like the way atheists desperately trying to picture us for the public
‘‘They deny evolution’'!
We approve whatever is scientifically approved
and simply deny what is NOT
By this we conclude
Support us by LIKES
SUBSCRIBE
FOLLOW
SHARE
on all Social Networks
we will meet again in another episode
years years years years years years years
thank you for watching