Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
it's side so let me clarify a couple of things i'm no longer on air america in
this show is not cohost of buchanan grovel
in you pronounce my name cedar but do you know when i got radio use a seder
doesn't bother me because the more people are likely to find the show that
way
the good marker institute in two thousand eleven
shows that if you give free birth control
to win
the insurance premiums
per individual on that plan
cross the border
will rise anywhere from thirty seven to forty one dollars a year
that is
in relationship to a five to fourteen thousand dollar
uh... premium
however that does not factoring
the fact
of how much savings down the road
both insurance companies and frankly all of us
will save
from
uh... preventing unwanted pregnancies
from all the other health issues that bad people take contraception for
because the contraceptive pill for
so you have uh...
couples using known method of contraception money wha in five percent
chance of unintended pregnancy within twelve months
insures that wave co-pays also avoid shelling out for complications that are
often accompany unplanned pregnancies including iris situations as birth of
success in children that are probly spaced out a woman doesn't know that
she's pregnant drinks during those first crucial months preteen girls having
children
contraception does not cost insurers nearly as much as people assume
only twenty eight percent of women use the most expensive for our former birth
control the pill
will back a lot likely
but thirty seven percent of couples choose tubal sterilization asian or back
of the second e
that won't change
um...
and so we know
that the savings are going to be much higher down the road
like i said
yet two thousand study by the national business group on health
it winds up costing employers fifteen to seventeen percent more
than providing this free contraceptive coverage
because
peter shifts premiums will go up
here's the problem
peter doesn't spend his day
going over the actuarial tables
so peter schiff does not realize
that by not providing
contraceptive care for his employers that his premiums that he will play
for his in pointers
goes up because
one of them
or two of them or five of them i don't know the numbers it's in the study
will have complications that will arise
maybe he's hurting productivity 'cause one as an unplanned pregnancy
maybe there's a other odd complications that happen because they don't get
peers not aware of this because he has a business tour
but he refuses to look at the data because it doesn't fit into his paranoia
and
that is not to mention the cost that is born by
uh... other people outside of uh... uh...
woman gets pregnant
loses her job
happens to switch our job
has no insurance
we end up paying for it to uh... medicaid
the
this is going to say it's a siding money it's going to save
uh... employer's money
as his savior insurer's money
the data is there
he has no data decide anything
the idea that insurance companies haven't jumped on this is the functional
equivalent of people saying in new york in nineteen ninety six or whatever was
what was a two thousand three
when they have banned
um...
uh... transects
in restaurants
you remember when they did this
and it was a he's going to strongly the restaurant business in new york
it's going to destroy
here's later no in fact it has an impact of the restaurant business at all
but what we do know
is that the uh... through
uh...
through surveys and tess a blood reports
that the level of trans fats
plastic
artificial trans fats and americans blistering is at half of what it was
ten years ago
there have been significant
benefits
and i ecosalon if it's to society
and despite the fact
that uh...
all these restaurant for dinner
close up because i can't use plastic in their cooking
it didn't happen
you do not have to travel very far
for industries to assume
that certain things are going to destroy their industry and find out it doesn't
assist human nature people like change
and it would also appears to be human nature is dating or data
because it doesn't fit in
with their libertarian ideology
customer service that i think peter was being disingenuous
because if this really was about cost
for a libertarian
they would have gone and dug up to date
he would have a safe no sam you're wrong i've seen the two thousand study by the
national business go buy health
but you're not aware of the two thousand three study by the blah blah blah blah
blah
not libertarians philosophically
do not
government intervention
unless
it's just sort of like the receded government intervention
that sets up things like corporations
or
the ones that protect their property
through government violence
i mean that's the problem libertarianism
is that they just want the status quo
because more often than not it benefits
certain group of people that they perceive
really are deserving that benefit remember unit these people
you know one point
all people are gonna start buying the pell more
uh... because it's gonna be free but in the next breath he says these people so
irresponsibly probably needed to tell
at statement
ten-second clip of that entire exchange is the most
illustrative
of really what is behind libertarianism
f the suckers
half the week after stupid
half the less fortunate
but guess what folks
even if these people
are stupid
even if these people are irresponsible
they live in society with us
and we cannot deny their existence
and we can either
have society function to absorb the stupidity
or we can just simply
pay for it
in many other ways
we cannot build
that
barge in the ocean
and bring all the stupid people there
and read ourselves of all the week in the infirmary society
they're here
you're not going anywhere and we can either address it
or we can pay the consequences