Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
Game Changing!
Look Who Just Slapped Obama With Spying Lawsuit, You’ll Be Speechless
The investigation concerning the spying of Donald Trump and his transition team by previous
President Obama and his insight organizations is increasing.
The government watchdog group, Judicial Watch, has documented a few Freedom Of Information
Act (FOIA) asks for, which have been overlooked by the U.S. Bureau of Justice (DOJ) and the
National Security Agency (NSA) in regards to Obama’s National Security Adviser Susan
Rice and her correspondences with both of those organizations.
Presently, Judicial Watch has caught up with a claim against both the DOJ and NSA to constrain
them to turn over those archives that are critical in deciding whether the Obama organization
unlawfully spied, unmasked, and uncovered the characters of Trump staff keeping in mind
the end goal to hurt his administration.
Undoubtedly, Obama may be somewhat stressed!
From Breitbart (Judicial Watch’s Tom Fitton writing):
The Obama administration’s surveillance of Donald Trump and his subsequent campaigns
and the subsequent illegal leaking of Obama’s direction, it has become even more critical,
Classified information in an effort to undermine the Trump administration.
A statement from Judicial Watch revealed:
We are pleased to inform you that the Obama National Security Advisor (NSA) for the US
Department of Justice (FOIA) The Judicial Watch v. The Duc computers, the suspected
communications between Russia and the Trump campaign / transition officials, and the unassuming
identities of any US citizen associated with the Trump presidential campaign or transition
team who were identified pursuant to intelligence collection activities (Judicial Watch v. US
Department of Justice and National Security Administration (No. 1: 17-cv-01002)).
You can see our FOIA request forms on the basis of the new lawsuit and comprehensive:
Susan Rice regarding about, about, or whether the National Security Advisor is a member
of the National Security Advisory Board, or any of the requests for information, analyzes,
summaries, assessments, transcripts, or similar records submitted to the Department of Justice
Related to the following: Any actual or suspected effort by the Russian
government or any individual acting on behalf of the Russian government to influence or
otherwise interfere with the 2016 presidential election;
The alleged hacking of computer systems utilized by the Democratic National Committee and / or
the Clinton presidential campaign; Any or actual or suspected communication between
any member of the Trump presidential campaign or transition team and any official or employee
of the Russian government or any individual acting on behalf of the Russian government;
or The identities of U.S. citizens associated
with the Trump presidential campaign or transition team were identified pursuant to intelligence
collection activities.
Any and all records created and / or produced in response to any request described in part
1 of this request; and Any and all records of the communication between
any of the official, employee, or representative of the Department of Justice (National Security
Agency) and any member, employee, staff member, or representative of the National Security
Council In Part 1 of this request.
The timeframe for this request is January 1, 2016, to the present.
This is the fifth Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit(see here, here,
here, and here) related to the surveillance, unmasking, and illegal leaking targeting President
Trump and his associates.
I am confident our investigation is more comprehensive than anything out of Congress, or from the
new “special counsel” (see below) in the Justice Department.
We concur with the finishes of Judicial Watch: that these archives are pivotal to closure
the civil argument for the last time.
Whatever data the reports contain requirements to turn out for the world to see so the Democrats
are compelled to quiets down about Trump and concede Obama and Hillary are degenerate swamp
rats that need to go imprison.
What do you think about this?
Do not hesitate and write your thoughts in the comment section below.
Thank
you
for reading.
H/T Breitbart