Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
c_b_s_ news chief les moonves as
uh... attended up president obama fundraiser and he also out in journalism
is being partisan this is kind of interesting because mood as overseas the
news division at c_b_s_ news ok and then it's interesting that he told the new
york times
that's uh... all bomber has shown great leadership on the issue of gay marriage
that he leads the news division but ultimately journalism has changed
partisanship is very bunch apart of journalism now and he said are running
news division i'd given no money any candidate even though he is attending
the fundraiser and presumably
helped to fundraise although he may have given his own money
what do you think of this in a lot of conservatives are calling the saddest
typical liberal hypocrisy
because our journalism as partisan but he's admittedly going to a fundraiser
for obama
and running in news division therefore c_b_s_ news
must be
partisan journalism
later on there was a statement i think put out by wannabes spokespeople
basically just
flatly denying but he was referring to c_b_s_ news itself is being a partisan
news outlet
recent journalism has changed the partisanship is a part of journalism
your income missing everything when you say that i'm you know including his own
use the part of the a_t_f_ you not excluding c_b_s_ trade i mean that seems
to be a blanket statement
is it is it appropriate for someone in his position to be attending obama
fundraiser we're not talking about the white house correspondent dinner for
example where two people from from both all sides
this is a fundraiser for one particular presidential candidate even if he's not
by the letter of the law
donating money
bc there representing c_b_s_
it looks like he's not i'm assuming he's not assuming he's not so now i mean i
don't have a problem with it he sees a person in every person has there
has there
stance on issues in august question then i'm what i'm going to then is is he in a
position to be making comments about journalistic partisanship and be taken
seriously
i think anyone in his position is in a position to be making comments about
journalistic partisanship
notes on what do you think
yeah i don't think because ameen
if someone supports one of the two candidates they might have something
useful and interesting are true to say but i did my religion can you support
the more privately if you are in the business of managing news about those
candidates
lovelier asking is does it look bad
it obviously looks bad because we're talking about it because everyone's
talking about it yet but if you're asking it is an example of something
that shows the c_b_s_ news will be biased not necessarily
i think that it would be best friend to avoid political fund raisers given his
position
i guess you could hurt but i mean i'm fighting
appalling that he's doing so