Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
CONTENT.
>> AND ALSO ESCALATING CRITICISM
ON THE'S 41%.
SO LO AND BEHOLD, MAYBE
REPUBLICANS COULD GO ON HOLD.
KP LISTEN TO THIS, ALMOST IN
AGREEMENT.
>> THERE'S REAL, REEM DANGER THE
DEMOCRATS COULD SUFFER BIG
LOSSES BECAUSE THE REAL ESTATE
AND THE TURF ON WHICH THESE
ELECTIONS ARE TAKING PLACE,
GIVEN WITH AN ADVANTAGE OF THE
REPUBLICANS.
>> THERE WAS 14 SEATS IN PLAY
AND I THINK IT'S HIGHLY UNLIKELY
THAT THE REPUBLICANS PICK UP A
MAJORITY.
>> WE TALKED A LITTLE BIT ABOUT
THIS YESTERDAY.
EVERYONE IS STARTING TO THINK
THIS MAP IS EXPANDING FOR
REPUBLICANS WHEN IT COPS TO THE
SENATE.
ONE LAUCH IN THE "NEW YORK
TIMES" SAID THE PRESIDENT IS
POISONOUS TO THE PARTY'S
CANDIDATES.
>> I REMEMBER BACK IN 2010
ROBERT GIIPS GIBBS SAID A
SIMILAR THING ABOUT THE NUK.
>> I THINK THEY ARE PRESSING THE
PANIC BUTTON OVER AND OVER GIVEN
BECAUSE IT LOOKS LIKE THE GOP
HAS BEEN MORE DISCIPLINED THIS
SICKLE AND DEMOCRATS JUST
HAVEN'T BEEN ABLE TO DO IT.
>> IT FEELS LIKE 2006 IN SOME
WAYS WHERE THE REPUBLICANS WERE
RUNNING AWAY FROM GEORGE BUSH IN
ALL SPORTS.
HE'S STILL GOING TO BE
BENEFICIAL FOR DEMOCRATS WHEN HE
DID NOT DO THAT IN 2012.
SO THEY'RE GOING TO NEED HIM FOR
THAT.
>> IT DOES GO BACK TO THE IDEA
OF THE PRESIDENTIAL HAVING A
PARTY THE DAY AFTER ST.
PATRICK'S DAY.
THERE ARE OBAMA DEMOCRATS AND