Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
More baby dinosaurs found, a new documentary on
Noah's flood, and we answer a boatload of
criticisms regarding overthrusts - this, is
Genesis Week.
[music]
Welcome! To this episode of Genesis Week, the
weekly program of creationary commentary on news,
views and events pertaining to the origins
controversy, made possible by the supporters of
CORE Ottawa, Citizens for Origins Research and
Education, and of course, carried on the
Christianima network - christianima.com - Christian
cinema at its finest. Excellence in pirate
broadcasting, we continue to bring you the
information the anticreationists don't want you to
see or hear, and giving glory to our Creator while
doing it. The Bible does not say "Be ye transformed
by the removal of your mind," rather we here at
Genesis Week believe your brain was intelligently
designed, and God wants you to use it. Remember if
you get lost in cyberspace, you can just punch in
wazooloo.com or genesisweek.com and you can find
us, and also subscribe to our youtube channel to
get extras like CrEvo rants and full interviews
with our guests. I'm your host, Ian Juby
A couple of episodes back, we discussed how
dinosaur egg nests actually provide good evidence
of a global flood. We also discussed the rarity of
dinosaur embryos in eggs, and in multiple episodes
we discussed the finding of preserved soft tissues
in dinosaur bones, and ultimately even living
organisms like toads in rocks alleged to be over
400 million years old.
Well let's add to that mix. This past week a report
came out in Nature mazagine, detailing a
spectacular find of dinosaur embryo bones in
varying stages of development. Multiple dinosaur
embryos were found in a disarticulated state - that
means they're all ripped apart. They were
identified as Lufengosaurus and were believed to
have been killed by... (drumroll please) Take a
guess - take a wild guess! What do you think the
scientists concluded killed these dinosaurs?
You guessed it - a flood! Notice a consistency
here? Go back and check out our "Eggsplained by the
flood" esipode to see this just falls in line with
everything else. It was a flood that
killed the dinosaurs.
Another interesting point about this new find is
that because the embryos were represented in
different stages of development, the researchers
were able to guage the growth rates of these
dinosaurs, and concluded that they grew remarkably
fast - even in the egg. If you'll recall, this
again ties in with points we discussed in our
"eggsplained by the flood" esipode, as the embryos
are exceedingly rare, and the ones we do find, may
even be development that occurred while the mother
was carrying the eggs. So these rapid growth rates
add more weight to that supposition.
And last but certainly not least, guess what they
found in the bones? (drumroll please)
You guessed it - collagen fibers! In other words,
protein matter which again SHOULD NOT BE IN BONES
that are alleged to be 70 million years old. Think
about that - 70 MILLION years. There should be
absolutely none left. There is NO known process by
which biomatter can be preserved for so long, and
every study conducted says it cannot last that
long. Again, this is consistent with what has been
seen throughout the rock record, and consistent
with the idea that the dinosaurs are NOT millions
of years old, but only a few thousand years old.
Exactly what the Bible would say.
You'll recall last week we discussed things like
the ATP synthase motor which we creationists and
the Intelligent design community would say CANNOT
evolve one small step at a time.
A paper out this week in Evolutionary Biology
magazine...agrees. Entitled "Complexity by
subtraction", authors McShea and Hordijk still
assume evolution and then go on to suggest that
complex systems like the bacterial flagellum must
have evolved from something MORE complex.
Well, creationists have been contending that
complexity of life IS breaking down and becoming
more simpler - which would be DE-evolution, but
this paper is loaded with (I'm sorry in advance, I
just....don't know any other way to say this) it's
loaded with astonishing oxymorons! Organs like the
brain are too complex - they must have evolved from
something more complex! That's right, they are
admitting they are operating on a deteriorated
brain - meaning their ancient ape-like ancestors
were smarter than they are. Well - how did the
first "more complex" molecular machine arise? Did
it arise from something more complex? And what did
it evolve from? Eventually, you get more and more
complex, ad infinitum, until you have infinite
complexity! More commonly known as .... God.
I'm sorry, but this paper gets the EPIC facepalm of
the day - I'd ask you to do it with me, but I don't
want youse hurting yourselves. We appreciate you
viewers. So, simulate it with me.
I am excited to make this announcement: Stephen
Orsatti, CEO of Christianima networks and myself
will be producing a documentary over the summer
entitled the "Mystery of Noah's Flood." You may
think you know what it's going to be about, but it
is going to be loaded with surprises and
information you have not seen before. But - we need
YOUR help to do it. We're aiming for the big
markets, but big markets require big budgets, and
make no mistake about it, we want to produce a
quality documentary that will rival the best: BBC,
PBS, CBC, and we'll be pitching this documentary to
all the major broadcasters as well. I'll be
traveling literally right across Canada, from the
most eastern point of North America, right out to
the Rocky Mountains. We're going to show you the
evidence that explains the mystery of Noah's flood.
We're going to go into the history of geology and
what has been the most effective war against the
Bible. We're going to reveal how Noah built the
ark, how did he get all the animals to the ark and
how did he get them all to fit! We're going to go
down so many unexpected rabbit trails that you'll
get dizzy, and as we follow all of these seemingly
disconnected rabbit trails, we'll be surprised to
find that they all bring us to the same place,
solving the Mystery of Noah's flood.
Stephen and I hope you'll support us in this
project - we've set up our crowdfunding page where
you can see the perks - like for a $25 donation,
you get to download the finished documentary in
High Definition and get an autographed poster for
the movie. For $35 you get a supporter edition
blueray copy, autographed by the producers, which
makes it much easier to forge our signatures and
steal our identities. Maybe we need to rethink this
Stephen. We have a whole list of perks - check it
out, and if you can, please help us produce this
documentary which we believe will have a profound
impact. Visit mysteryofnoahsfloo d.com and pitch in
today, and also - please send the link to all your
friends on twitfaceplus.
Speaking of geology, wow did we raise a ruckus with
our "Geologic column busted" episode. Got lots of
feedback, including from some atheistic geologists
saying I was all wrong on my facts.
I thought I would revisit what we discussed because
of all the feedback we received. I first of all
pointed out the absence of evidence of geologic
time in the rock record. Atheistic geology
professor, Dr. Derek Ager, in his book "the new
catastrophism" tried to portray this absense of
evidence as evidence of catastrophes. I completely
agree that the rock record is one of catastrophe -
but I would say one gigantic catastrophe -
specifically a world wide flood. Ager tried to
portray the "gaps" in the rock record as gaps of
time, and evidence of catastrophe. I'm pointing the
rock layers themselves as profound evidence of
catastrophe, not the alleged gaps in between.
I pointed out the alleged gaps of time in Grand
Canyon. Some then claimed that the unconformity
near the bottom of Grand Canyon was evidence of
time. For those not familiar, an unconformity
looks like this:
Rock layers were laid down originally horizontal,
and in the case of the Grand Canyon supergroup,
they were tilted. Then they were cut off by
erosion, then more layers laid down on top.
The rock layers do not conform to each other, and
so it's suggested that there was perhaps millions
of years of time between when the supergroup was
cut and these layers were deposited.
First of all, my point was that there was no
evidence of the 215 million You're welcome to argue
that, but where is the evidence? If all these rock
layers were laid down over millions of years, then
why was there mysteriously NO sediments laid down
during that 215 million years at the top of the cut
supergroup? That's a lot of years - think about
that for a second. Scientific studies I conducted
in my bedroom show that dust accumulates at almost
1 milimeter per year. At that rate, 215 million
years would accumulate 215,000 METERS - over
700,000 FEET of dust. Yet, those who argue for deep
time are arguing from an absence of evidence. There
is NO accumulation of sediments from the alleged
215 million years of time at the contact in
question. May I suggest that it's not the sediments
that are missing, it's the TIME that's missing. The
earth is young, and so is Grand Canyon!
And so it is throughout the entire geologic record
- there are HUGE GAPS of alleged deep time that
have come and gone, apparently without leaving a
single trace. May I suggest to you the much more
believable story is that there is no deep time.
Let's assume that my bedroom is an anomoly for dust
collection - personally, I think it is. I think the
accumulation of dust in my bedroom is much, much
higher than in nature. So let's assume an average
accumulation of sediments at a rate of 1/1000 of an
inch. For the alleged 600 million years of the
Phanerozoic period - which isn't a period at all
but a completely non existant, abstract construct.
600 million times 1/1000th of an inch is 600,000
inches, or 50,000 feet, or just under ten MILES of
dirt - 16 kilometers thick. Where's all the
deposits from deep time? You can start to see why
myself and others have said that the geologic
column does not exist except in textbooks and
museum displays. Some have claimed that the
geologic column DOES exist on several places on
planet earth - as you can see by our simple math,
even if there was the correct sequence found
somewhere, it would still be MISSING huge deposits
of sediments - absence of evidence of deep time.
So just because you happen to get a couple spots
where the layers can be dated from oldest to
youngest does not validate the fictitious
geological column, because you're still missing the
vast majority of it!
But then we get to the HUNDREDS of locations on
earth where the geological order is reversed -
allegedly older layers resting on top of younger
layers - as I pointed out in episode 30.
If even ONE of those hundreds was found to be a
genuine, out-of-sequence layering, it would nullify
the geologic column.
If you'll recall, I pointed out that these
out-of-sequence systems are explained away by
claiming that the older rock was THRUST over top of
the younger rock - hence the term overthrust. If
you'll recall, I also pointed out that sliding a
1,000 foot thick rock over top of the other would
leave glaringly obvious evidence - scratch marks in
the rock called slickensides. Heating and melting
of the rock. And rolling and balling of the rocks
into what is called mylonite.
I then showed the contact of the Coleman overthrust
in Banff National Park, where rocks claimed to be
520 million years old are resting on top of 75
million year old shale. I then showed this picture
where you can see there are NO slickensides or
scratch marks in the rock.
YouTuber Wildwood Claire got quite excited, calling
me a moron because the slickensides would be on the
bedding plane. Yes, I agree they would be on the
bedding plane. In fact apparently Claire and others
did not understand they were looking at the bedding
plane - the camera is looking straight up, at the
underside of the rock. Exactly where there should
be those slickensides if the rocks had actually
slid across each other. The slickensides are absent
- missing. And so is the dramatic heating
of the rock.
In fact, I did find slickensides and heating of the
rock - known as metamorphosis. Guess where I found
it? On the VERTICAL fractures in the rocks. So the
only evidence of sliding is from the vertical
movement of the rocks, where they broke during
tectonics, and slid against each other vertically.
So you can see here in this photograph, it was just
a little itty bit of movement - at most a couple of
feet, and yet it produced lots of evidence of
movement. We are then supposed to believe that the
thousand foot thick rock layer somehow slid for
KILOMETERS over top the other rock, and yet left no
trace of such movement?
The Empire Mountain thrust fault, just south of
Tucson, Arizona, has Permian rocks on top of
Cretaceous. What's especially interesting here is
that the Cretaceous limestone is actually marble -
it has undergone heating and pressure - it has
changed its state because of this, and it's called
metamorphosis. The Permian rocks have not
experienced this heat and pressure. So this would
actually indicate that the Cretaceous rocks ARE
older than the Permian rocks. It further indicates
that this out-of-order sequence is GENUINE. There
is no overthrust here - as Burdic and Slusher
documented back in 1969, and I further verified in
2009, no slickensides, the Permian rocks haven't
been heated, the rocks are locked together in what
Burdic described as a "gear mesh fit" - the rocks
on the bottom were gouged out, and then filled in
with upper rocks. Obviously, the rocks did not
slide relative to each other.
Several people suggested that perhaps the rocks
slid veeeerrrrrry slooooowly - like, 1 or 2
centimeters per year, and that's why the rocks
didn't heat up and melt. In fact several people
mentioned the San Andreas fault of California as a
classic example of slowwww movement over long
periods of time.
Let's examine some basic physics first. I mentioned
this in the show, but apparently several skeptics
did not understand the physics, so allow
me to demonstrate.
Here we have a block of wood on a ramp. Right now,
gravity is pulling on the block, attempting to pull
it down the ramp. However, there is another force
resisting the movement - friction. In this case, it
is static or standing friction, and the resistance
is greater than the force of gravity. However,
watch what happens when I break the static friction
by pushing the block.
The force of gravity didn't change, yet the block
is now sliding downhill. What happened? It's
because static friction is greater than moving
friction. So whatever force would move the
mountain, has to overcome static friction. There's
a lot of elastic force that would get stored up in
the force, so that when the mountain did start
moving, it would move in huge jumps, creating an
incredible amount of heat at the sliding point.
Now some, including Wildwood Claire, claimed that
the San Andreas fault is proof that I'm wrong!
Really? Evidently these skeptics overlooked a major
point: The San Andreas fault is not an OVERthrust.
It is rocks sliding beside each other. It doesn't
have a thousand foot layer of rock sliding up over
top of the others - and the San Andreas fault moves
in jumps - why do you think there's so much
earthquake activity there? The san Andreas fault is
completely irrelevent to the discussion. So why did
the skeptics bring it up?
Secondly, tell me: Are there slickensides left from
the rocks of the San Andreas fault sliding against
each other? You bet! So Claire and the other
skeptics validated my point: there is NO evidence
that these out of sequence rock layers are actually
overthrusts sliding over top of one another.
So I leave an open challenge to the skeptics: Go
visit the Keystone thrust, the Castle Mountain
thrust, the unnamed thrust by Bragg Creek, Alberta,
the Coleman thrust, the Empire Mountain thrust, the
Lewis thrust, and the Valley of Fire thrust. Take
lots of notes and pictures, and when you're done,
then we'll talk and compare notes. Please notice
the lack of slickensides, metamorphosis and
mylonite - all the evidence that should be there if
these thrust faults were genuine. Please notice the
gear-mesh interlocking of the layers that shows
that there was NO movement between the layers -
they're locked together. Please notice that while
I'm referring to my own personal research on the
matter, you'll also find these things mentioned in
the secular geological literature as well. So I
aint the only one seeing it!
These are not overthrusts. These are genuine
sequence reversals of the evolutionary time scale.
These reversals of alleged time demonstrate that
there is no deep time. If there is no deep time,
then there is no evolution. The Biblical
interpretation would not even interpret these rock
layers as being "out of sequence" because in a
world wide flood, it was all laid down at once -
there is no time involved.
This is all powerful evidence refuting deep time,
and affirming a global, watery catastrophe which
laid down all the rock record as we know it. Hey -
if evolution was wrong about that, and the Bible is
right about that, then what else is the
Bible right about?
Jesus talked about the world wide flood as fact,
and in fact he cited the flood as judgment from
God, and warned that in the last days, it would be
on earth, just like it was before the flood. And
that in the last days there would be a final
judgment on earth. The great white throne judgment.
For 120 years, Noah warned the people of earth of
the judgment to come, and pointed to the ark which
was free salvation from the judgment to come. This
was symbolic of Jesus Christ. You are being warned
of judgment to come, and we are pointing to Jesus
Christ being the salvation from that judgment to
come. As the Apostle Paul wrote in Romans:
Why don't you call upon Christ for salvation today?
This show sponsored in part by Canada's first
permanent Creation Museum, in the heart of
Alberta's dinosaur beds, the Big Valley Creation
Science Museum. bvcsm.com
And by Genesis Park.com get your own beautiful hard
covered copy of the Chronicles of Dinosauria, the
history and mystery of dinosaurs and man. Now
available from New Leaf Publishing.
What does the Bible say about aliens? Is there life
on other planets? What can science tell us about
the possibility of aliens? Ian Juby gives answers
to these and many more questions in this
fascinating and highly disturbing subject.
Looking analytically at the subject, complete with
testimonies of people who claim to have been
abducted by aliens. The answers will probably
surprise you. In this 1 and a half hour lecture,
Ian shows that the alleged "aliens" are a problem,
and that Jesus is the solution.
Order on line today at Ian's bookstore.
[scary, dramatic music]
Wahoo! Mail for me?
Aaaa!
Yup, that's it!
The East Vietnamese jumping spider.
The venom is so strong that one bite will kill any
child, and 95% of adults. The surviving 5%
typically slip into a coma for three to six months,
only to wake up with permanent paralysis.
Hmmmmm.....
[scary, dramatic music]
[music]
A couple of weeks back, we aired the "Flat earth"
rant. Now it was several years ago I produced that
rant, and I had forgotten that I had mispoken one
part there, which several people asked me about. I
mentioned that Jesus had addressed evolution in his
day. Obviously the modern day neo darwinian theory
of evolution was not around in Christ's day, so
obviously that's not what I was talking about, but
evolution has been around for far, far longer
than Darwin.
I had gotten this from Brock Lee's excellent little
book "Comparative Views on Origins" which, much
like its title suggests, is a book examining the
many many theories of origins of humans. Brock's
point was that in Christ's day, a version of
evolution was around - the Greeks had a belief in a
form of evolution. So if evolution was true, we
would expect that Christ would have just said to
the Jews "Go check out what the Greeks are thinking
- they on the right track."
Instead, Jesus spoke of Creation, Adam and Eve,
Noah, the ark and the flood, as literal history and
fact. I like the way Brock put it:
Desiree wrote in:
Excellent questions, thank you for writing in. I
will answer your first question of Who created God?
with a question: How did the first life
on earth arise?
The reason I ask that question is because it cannot
be answered. Because natural processes dictate that
life only arises from life, therefore the first
life on earth had to be by a SUPERnatural process.
Just like no one can answer the question of where
did the first life come from, because it is a
question about the SUPERnatural, we also cannot
answer the question of Where did God come from? All
we can say is that He came from outside of the
natural realm - the supernatural.
In fact, to take it a step farther, if you were
capable of understanding the supernatural, and
where God came from, then technically YOU could be
GOD. So we could not even understand the answer to
that question, even if we had the answer - because
it is beyond our comprehension.
As for the vast differences in genetics in humans,
it is surprising how rapidly those variations can
occur. And your question aludes to a very common
question of "Where did Cain get his wife?" The
answer comes from Genesis 5:4:
*** wasn't a problem back then because the human
genes were perfect. *** is a problem now,
because of genetic defects. Thanks for writing in,
I gotta call this a wrap, thank you for watching.
You can send in your comments and questions to us
in a number of ways,
and let us remember those
words of warning from our Creator, the Lord Jesus
Christ who said "I am the way, the truth and the
life - No man comes to the Father but through me."
See you next week.
We are a viewer supported program and need your
support to keep this program on the air. Please
pray for us, and if you wish to financially support
the program, Canadians can make a tax-deductible
donation to CORE Ottawa, Kanata North Post Office
Box 72075, Ottawa, ON. Canada, K2K 2P4
While we cannot offer tax deductable receipts
outside of Canada, donors wishing to financially
support the program can do so on line at
ianjuby.org/donations and thank you for your
support.
[music]