Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
>> GOOD EVENING. PG THANKS FOR JOINING US.
PG THANKS FOR JOINING US. I'M ANYONE HOST OF AD
I'M ANYONE HOST OF AD ILLUSTRATED.
ILLUSTRATED. OUR WEEKLY POLITICAL COMMENTARY
OUR WEEKLY POLITICAL COMMENTARY ON LOCAL, STATE AND NATIONAL
ON LOCAL, STATE AND NATIONAL FARES.
FARES. ON TONIGHT'S SHOW WE'LL SPEAK
ON TONIGHT'S SHOW WE'LL SPEAK ONE ON ONE WITH STATE
ONE ON ONE WITH STATE REPRESENTATIVE ABOUT HIS PLANS
REPRESENTATIVE ABOUT HIS PLANS TO RUN FOR CONGRESS THIS YEAR.
TO RUN FOR CONGRESS THIS YEAR. PLUS OUR ROUNDTABLE LOOKS AT THE
PLUS OUR ROUNDTABLE LOOKS AT THE GOVERNOR'S WE TOPOGRAPHY SB 1062
GOVERNOR'S WE TOPOGRAPHY SB 1062 AND MAYOR ROTHSCHILD'S STATE OF
AND MAYOR ROTHSCHILD'S STATE OF THE CITY ADDRESS.
THE CITY ADDRESS. ALL THAT AND MUCH MORE IS COMING
ALL THAT AND MUCH MORE IS COMING UP NEXT.
UP NEXT. FIRST A LOOK AT TODAY'S TOP
FIRST A LOOK AT TODAY'S TOP STORIES.
STORIES. >>> VICE PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN WAS
>>> VICE PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN WAS IN PHOENIX THIS MORNING.
IN PHOENIX THIS MORNING. HE STOPPED BY A PANCAKE
HE STOPPED BY A PANCAKE RESTAURANT TO TALK ABOUT HEALTH
RESTAURANT TO TALK ABOUT HEALTH CARE.
CARE. THE WHITE HOUSE IS TRYING TO GET
THE WHITE HOUSE IS TRYING TO GET MORE PEOPLE TO SIGN UP FOR
MORE PEOPLE TO SIGN UP FOR HEALTH INSURANCE UNDER THE
HEALTH INSURANCE UNDER THE FEDERAL HEALTH CARE LAW.
FEDERAL HEALTH CARE LAW. SINCE THAT BECAME AVAILABLE
SINCE THAT BECAME AVAILABLE ABOUT 40,000 ARIZONA RESIDENTS
ABOUT 40,000 ARIZONA RESIDENTS HAVE SIGNED UP FOR PRIVATE
HAVE SIGNED UP FOR PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE.
HEALTH INSURANCE. ANOTHER 60,000 HAVE SIGNED UP
ANOTHER 60,000 HAVE SIGNED UP FOR MEDICAID SINCE THE LAW WENT
FOR MEDICAID SINCE THE LAW WENT INTO EFFECT.
INTO EFFECT. >>> AN INDEPENDENT AUDIT OF THE
>>> AN INDEPENDENT AUDIT OF THE U.S. BOTHERED PATROL FOUND
U.S. BOTHERED PATROL FOUND AGENTS MAY HAVE STEPPED IN FRONT
AGENTS MAY HAVE STEPPED IN FRONT OF MOVING CARS ON PURPOSE TO
OF MOVING CARS ON PURPOSE TO JUSTIFY SHOOTING AT THE DRIVER.
JUSTIFY SHOOTING AT THE DRIVER. THE AGENCY NEVER MADE THE YEAR
THE AGENCY NEVER MADE THE YEAR OLD REPORT PUBLIC BUT IT WAS
OLD REPORT PUBLIC BUT IT WAS LEAKED TO A NEWS OUTLET AND
LEAKED TO A NEWS OUTLET AND INVITING CONTROVERSY.
INVITING CONTROVERSY. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION
CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION HIRED THE POLICE EXECUTIVE
HIRED THE POLICE EXECUTIVE RESEARCH FORUM KNOWN AS PERK TO
RESEARCH FORUM KNOWN AS PERK TO REVIEW PAST SHOOTINGS ACCORDING
REVIEW PAST SHOOTINGS ACCORDING TO THE "L.A. TIMES" WHICH
TO THE "L.A. TIMES" WHICH OBTAINED A COPY OF THE REPORT.
OBTAINED A COPY OF THE REPORT. IT CONCLUDED AGENTS SOMETIMES
IT CONCLUDED AGENTS SOMETIMES FIRED AT ROCK THROWERS WHEN THEY
FIRED AT ROCK THROWERS WHEN THEY COULD HAVE MOVED OUT OF THE WAY
COULD HAVE MOVED OUT OF THE WAY INSTEAD.
INSTEAD. IT WAS RECOMMENDED RESTRICTIONS
IT WAS RECOMMENDED RESTRICTIONS ON WHEN AGENTS CAN SHOOT AT
ON WHEN AGENTS CAN SHOOT AT DRIVES AND ROCK THROWERS A
DRIVES AND ROCK THROWERS A SUGGESTION THE AGENCY REJECTED.
SUGGESTION THE AGENCY REJECTED. ADVOCACY GROUPS ARE CALLING FOR
ADVOCACY GROUPS ARE CALLING FOR A PUBLIC RELEASE OF THE AUDIT.
A PUBLIC RELEASE OF THE AUDIT. >>> SOUTHERN ARIZONA WILL BEGIN
>>> SOUTHERN ARIZONA WILL BEGIN MARCH WITH A WINTER WEATHER
MARCH WITH A WINTER WEATHER WARNING.
WARNING. IT'S PREDICTED SNOW ABOVE 7,000
IT'S PREDICTED SNOW ABOVE 7,000 FEET TOMORROW NIGHT IN BOTH THE
FEET TOMORROW NIGHT IN BOTH THE SANTA CATALINA MOUNTAINS.
SANTA CATALINA MOUNTAINS. RAIN IS PREDICTED FOR THE
RAIN IS PREDICTED FOR THE VALLEY.
VALLEY. THAT'S A LOOK AT TONIGHT'S
THAT'S A LOOK AT TONIGHT'S HEADLINES.
ś >>> ORAL VALLEY TO MOIRNO TO
>>> ORAL VALLEY TO MOIRNO TO FLAGSTAFF IN THE GRAND CANYON
FLAGSTAFF IN THE GRAND CANYON AND HAS THE EASTERN HALF OF
AND HAS THE EASTERN HALF OF ARIZONA.
ARIZONA. THREE CANDIDATES ARE VYING FOR
THREE CANDIDATES ARE VYING FOR THE JOB.
THE JOB. THEY ARE ADAM QASMAN, ANDY TUR
THEY ARE ADAM QASMAN, ANDY TUR BIN AND JOEY KEENAN.
BIN AND JOEY KEENAN. JOINING ME IS KWASMAN.
JOINING ME IS KWASMAN. WELCOME TO THE SHOW.
WELCOME TO THE SHOW. BIG NEWS IN ARIZONA THIS WEEK
BIG NEWS IN ARIZONA THIS WEEK HAD TO BE THE SB 1062, THE BILL
HAD TO BE THE SB 1062, THE BILL THAT GOVERNOR BREWER VETOED THIS
THAT GOVERNOR BREWER VETOED THIS WEEK AFTER GREAT DEAL OF
WEEK AFTER GREAT DEAL OF NATIONAL ATTENTION.
NATIONAL ATTENTION. YOU VOTED FOR THIS BILL.
YOU VOTED FOR THIS BILL. WERE YOU DISAPPOINTED IN THE
WERE YOU DISAPPOINTED IN THE GOVERNOR'S VETO?
GOVERNOR'S VETO? >> SO, LET'S START FIRST AND
>> SO, LET'S START FIRST AND FORENORTHWEST SAY THAT NOBODY
FORENORTHWEST SAY THAT NOBODY WHO VOTED FOR THIS BILL, NOBODY
WHO VOTED FOR THIS BILL, NOBODY BELIEVES THAT ANY TYPE OF
BELIEVES THAT ANY TYPE OF DISCRIMINATION SHOULD EVER OCCUR
DISCRIMINATION SHOULD EVER OCCUR AMONG INDIVIDUALS OR BUSINESSES.
AMONG INDIVIDUALS OR BUSINESSES. JAN BREWER'S VETO, WHILE SWAS
JAN BREWER'S VETO, WHILE SWAS DISAPPOINTING BECAUSE I BELIEVED
DISAPPOINTING BECAUSE I BELIEVED IN WHAT THE BILL DID, IT ALLOWED
IN WHAT THE BILL DID, IT ALLOWED US TO MOVE FORWARD AND START
US TO MOVE FORWARD AND START CONSENT STRAIGHT ON REPEALING
CONSENT STRAIGHT ON REPEALING OBAMACARE.
OBAMACARE. I HAVE A BILL TO REPEAL THE
I HAVE A BILL TO REPEAL THE MEDICAID EXPANSION IN THE
MEDICAID EXPANSION IN THE LEGISLATURE AND GET FOCUSED ON
LEGISLATURE AND GET FOCUSED ON JOB CREATION.
JOB CREATION. >>> YOU SAY IT WAS NOT GOING TO
>>> YOU SAY IT WAS NOT GOING TO BE USED AS A SHIELD TO
BE USED AS A SHIELD TO DISCRIMINATE BUT OF COURSE IT IS
DISCRIMINATE BUT OF COURSE IT IS ILLEGAL TO DISCRIMINATE AGAINST
ILLEGAL TO DISCRIMINATE AGAINST CERTAIN CLASSES OF PEOPLE, WOMEN
CERTAIN CLASSES OF PEOPLE, WOMEN AND MINORITIES BUT NOT TO
AND MINORITIES BUT NOT TO ILLEGAL DISCRIMINATE AGAINST
ILLEGAL DISCRIMINATE AGAINST GAYS AT LEAST IN THE STATE OF
GAYS AT LEAST IN THE STATE OF ARIZONA OR ON THE FEDERAL LEVEL
ARIZONA OR ON THE FEDERAL LEVEL AND LAST YEAR THE U.S. SENATE
AND LAST YEAR THE U.S. SENATE PASSED THE EMPLOYMENT
PASSED THE EMPLOYMENT NONDISCRIMINATION ACT WHICH
NONDISCRIMINATION ACT WHICH WOULD HAVE ADDED GAYS AND
WOULD HAVE ADDED GAYS AND LESBIANS TO THE CLASS OF PEOPLE
LESBIANS TO THE CLASS OF PEOPLE WHO ARE PROTECTED FROM
WHO ARE PROTECTED FROM DISCRIMINATION.
DISCRIMINATION. THAT PASSED THE SENATE WITH THE
THAT PASSED THE SENATE WITH THE VOTES OF JOHN McCAIN AND JEFF
VOTES OF JOHN McCAIN AND JEFF FLAKE.
FLAKE. WOULD YOU SUPPORT LEGISLATION
WOULD YOU SUPPORT LEGISLATION LIKE THAT IN THE HOUSE IF YOU
LIKE THAT IN THE HOUSE IF YOU WERE ELECTED TO CONGRESS?
WERE ELECTED TO CONGRESS? >> I WOULD HAVE TO LOOK AT IT.
>> I WOULD HAVE TO LOOK AT IT. HERE'S THE DEAL.
HERE'S THE DEAL. I UNDERSTAND THAT PROTECTED
I UNDERSTAND THAT PROTECTED CLASSES SUCH AS RACE AND CREED
CLASSES SUCH AS RACE AND CREED WERE VERY IMPORTANT AT THE TIME,
WERE VERY IMPORTANT AT THE TIME, AT THEIR SPECIFIC TIMES.
AT THEIR SPECIFIC TIMES. I FOR ONE DON'T BELIEVE WE'RE IN
I FOR ONE DON'T BELIEVE WE'RE IN A SELMA, ALABAMA SITUATION IN
A SELMA, ALABAMA SITUATION IN MODERN SOCIETY.
MODERN SOCIETY. I BELIEVE THAT INDIVIDUALS
I BELIEVE THAT INDIVIDUALS ACTING AS INDIVIDUALS AS FREE
ACTING AS INDIVIDUALS AS FREE INDIVIDUALS AND TRADING WITH ONE
INDIVIDUALS AND TRADING WITH ONE ANOTHER -- I'LL GIVE YOU AND
ANOTHER -- I'LL GIVE YOU AND EXAMPLE.
EXAMPLE. IF THERE WERE A RESTAURANT THAT
IF THERE WERE A RESTAURANT THAT DIDN'T WANT TO SERVE HOMOSEXUALS
DIDN'T WANT TO SERVE HOMOSEXUALS OR JEWS OR PEOPLE WITH RED
OR JEWS OR PEOPLE WITH RED T-SHIRTS FOR ANY REASON, IF THEY
T-SHIRTS FOR ANY REASON, IF THEY WANT TO DISCRIMINATE I WOULD
WANT TO DISCRIMINATE I WOULD ABSOLUTELY BE AGAINST GOING
ABSOLUTELY BE AGAINST GOING THERE, I WOULD TELL MY FRIENDS,
THERE, I WOULD TELL MY FRIENDS, I WOULD FACEBOOK IT, I WOULD
I WOULD FACEBOOK IT, I WOULD PROTEST.
PROTEST. BUT PUTTING THE HEAVY YOKE ON
BUT PUTTING THE HEAVY YOKE ON GOVERNMENT WHO WANT TO PRACTICE
GOVERNMENT WHO WANT TO PRACTICE THEIR RELIGION FREELY WHICH BY
THEIR RELIGION FREELY WHICH BY THE WAY THIS BILL HAD NOTHING TO
THE WAY THIS BILL HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH *** ORIENTATION AS A
DO WITH *** ORIENTATION AS A CLASS STRUCTURE AS A PROTECTED
CLASS STRUCTURE AS A PROTECTED CLASS.
CLASS. THIS BILL HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH
THIS BILL HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH IT.
IT. IT WAS MADE INTO IT BY THE
IT WAS MADE INTO IT BY THE PROFESSIONAL LEFT.
PROFESSIONAL LEFT. BUT WHEN WE TALK ABOUT PROTECTED
BUT WHEN WE TALK ABOUT PROTECTED CLASSES, LIKE YOU SAID AT THE
CLASSES, LIKE YOU SAID AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL IT'S NOT TALKED
FEDERAL LEVEL IT'S NOT TALKED ABOUT AT THE STATE LEVEL THE
ABOUT AT THE STATE LEVEL THE STIFF TUCSON PLACED A PROTECTIVE
STIFF TUCSON PLACED A PROTECTIVE CLASS STATUTE IN WHICH THIS BILL
CLASS STATUTE IN WHICH THIS BILL STANDARDIZED BACK TO THE STATE
STANDARDIZED BACK TO THE STATE LEVEL.
LEVEL. BUT I WOULD HAVE TO REALLY LOOK
BUT I WOULD HAVE TO REALLY LOOK AT WHETHER WE WANT TO ADD MORE
AT WHETHER WE WANT TO ADD MORE PROTECTED CLASSES INTO OUR
PROTECTED CLASSES INTO OUR STATUTE.
STATUTE. I BELIEVE THAT FREE INDIVIDUALS
I BELIEVE THAT FREE INDIVIDUALS WILL DO THE RIGHT THING.
WILL DO THE RIGHT THING. I TRUST PEOPLE.
I TRUST PEOPLE. >> ONE MORE QUESTION ON THE GAY
>> ONE MORE QUESTION ON THE GAY AND LESBIAN TOPIC.
AND LESBIAN TOPIC. DO YOU BELIEVE GAYS AND LESBIANS
DO YOU BELIEVE GAYS AND LESBIANS SHOULD HAVE THE FREEDOM TO
SHOULD HAVE THE FREEDOM TO MARRY?
MARRY? >> YOU KNOW, WHEN IT'S IN FRONT
>> YOU KNOW, WHEN IT'S IN FRONT OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS
OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS WHETHER YOU BELIEVE IT OR NOT IT
WHETHER YOU BELIEVE IT OR NOT IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE
HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE PURVIEW OF ARTICLE I OF THE
PURVIEW OF ARTICLE I OF THE INSTITUTION.
INSTITUTION. I BELIEVE IN MARRIAGE
I BELIEVE IN MARRIAGE TRADITIONALLY.
TRADITIONALLY. >> LET'S TALK ABOUT IMMIGRATION
>> LET'S TALK ABOUT IMMIGRATION REFORM.
REFORM. THE STICKING POINT IS WHAT
THE STICKING POINT IS WHAT HAPPENS TO THE UNDOCUMENTED
HAPPENS TO THE UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS WHO ARE NOW IN THE
IMMIGRANTS WHO ARE NOW IN THE UNITED STATES.
UNITED STATES. THAT SEEMS TO BE PART THAT
THAT SEEMS TO BE PART THAT PEOPLE HAVE A HARD TIME SORTING
PEOPLE HAVE A HARD TIME SORTING OUT ONE TERMS OF GETTING SOME
OUT ONE TERMS OF GETTING SOME LEGISLATION PASSED.
LEGISLATION PASSED. HOUSE SPEAKER JOHN BOEHNER
HOUSE SPEAKER JOHN BOEHNER UNVEILED THAT SET OF PRINCIPLES
UNVEILED THAT SET OF PRINCIPLES AND HIS GENERAL THRUST WAS
AND HIS GENERAL THRUST WAS CITIZENSHIP FOR THE DREAM ACT
CITIZENSHIP FOR THE DREAM ACT KIDS AND SOME KIND OF LEGAL
KIDS AND SOME KIND OF LEGAL STATUS BUT NO CITIZENSHIP FOR
STATUS BUT NO CITIZENSHIP FOR OLDER UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS.
OLDER UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS. IS THAT SOMETHING COULD YOU HAVE
IS THAT SOMETHING COULD YOU HAVE SUPPORTED?
SUPPORTED? >> I DON'T.
>> I DON'T. I BELIEVE THAT WHETHER IT'S
I BELIEVE THAT WHETHER IT'S LEGAL STATUS OR PATH TO
LEGAL STATUS OR PATH TO CITIZENSHIP THESE ARE TANTAMOUNT
CITIZENSHIP THESE ARE TANTAMOUNT TO AMNESTY.
TO AMNESTY. MY PRIMARY OPPONENT SUPPORTED
MY PRIMARY OPPONENT SUPPORTED LEGAL STATUS IN AN ARTICLE.
LEGAL STATUS IN AN ARTICLE. HE WAS QUOTED EARLY LAST YEAR IN
HE WAS QUOTED EARLY LAST YEAR IN 2013, I DON'T KNOW IF HE'S BACK
2013, I DON'T KNOW IF HE'S BACK TRACKED ON THAT OR IF ANDY
TRACKED ON THAT OR IF ANDY TOBMAN DOES OR DOESN'T SUPPORT
TOBMAN DOES OR DOESN'T SUPPORT AMNESTY.
AMNESTY. HE'S RUNNING FOR CONGRESS SO HIS
HE'S RUNNING FOR CONGRESS SO HIS POSITION MIGHT CHANGE.
POSITION MIGHT CHANGE. AS FOR ME I DON'T BELIEVE THAT
AS FOR ME I DON'T BELIEVE THAT REWARDING INDIVIDUALS WHO BROKE
REWARDING INDIVIDUALS WHO BROKE THE LAW IS THE WAY TO GO ABOUT
THE LAW IS THE WAY TO GO ABOUT RIGHTING THE LAW.
RIGHTING THE LAW. I UNDERSTAND, I UNDERSTAND THERE
I UNDERSTAND, I UNDERSTAND THERE ARE THOSE WHO THROUGH NO FAULT
ARE THOSE WHO THROUGH NO FAULT OF THEIR OWN WERE PUT IN A
OF THEIR OWN WERE PUT IN A SITUATION THAT'S VERY DIFFICULT.
SITUATION THAT'S VERY DIFFICULT. BUT WE ARE A NATION OF LAWS.
BUT WE ARE A NATION OF LAWS. WE HAVE TO LOOK RIGHT NOW AT
WE HAVE TO LOOK RIGHT NOW AT SECURING THAT BORDER IF AND WHEN
SECURING THAT BORDER IF AND WHEN WE DECIDE TO ACTUALLY DO
WE DECIDE TO ACTUALLY DO SOMETHING ABOUT PROTECTING OUR
SOMETHING ABOUT PROTECTING OUR CITIZENS.
CITIZENS. BUT I DON'T BELIEVE THAT
BUT I DON'T BELIEVE THAT ANYTHING SHORT OF SECURING THAT
ANYTHING SHORT OF SECURING THAT BORDER, BUILDING THE DOUBLE
BORDER, BUILDING THE DOUBLE FENCE, I 9 ENFORCEMENT.
FENCE, I 9 ENFORCEMENT. WE CAN FIX IMMIGRATION IN THIS
WE CAN FIX IMMIGRATION IN THIS COUNTRY WITHOUT CREATING NEW
COUNTRY WITHOUT CREATING NEW STATUTES.
STATUTES. WE JUST NEED TO ENFORCE THE LAWS
WE JUST NEED TO ENFORCE THE LAWS ON THE BOOKS.
ON THE BOOKS. SO NO I DON'T RECALL THE
SO NO I DON'T RECALL THE REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP ON
REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP ON AMNESTY.
AMNESTY. >> WHAT SHOULD HAPPEN TO THE
>> WHAT SHOULD HAPPEN TO THE FOLKS WHO ARE NOW IN THE COUNTRY
FOLKS WHO ARE NOW IN THE COUNTRY ILLEGALLY.
ILLEGALLY. >> THIS IS A RED HERRING WHEN WE
>> THIS IS A RED HERRING WHEN WE TALK ABOUT IMMIGRATION REFORM AS
TALK ABOUT IMMIGRATION REFORM AS A WHOLE WITHOUT SECURING THAT
A WHOLE WITHOUT SECURING THAT BORDER, I FRANKLY DON'T WANT TO
BORDER, I FRANKLY DON'T WANT TO HAVE ANY CONVERSATION ABOUT
HAVE ANY CONVERSATION ABOUT IMMIGRATION REFORM.
IMMIGRATION REFORM. ONCE THAT BORDER IS SECURED AND
ONCE THAT BORDER IS SECURED AND NO, IT'S NEVER GOING TO BE 100%.
NO, IT'S NEVER GOING TO BE 100%. OF COURSE THERE'S NO POLICY,
OF COURSE THERE'S NO POLICY, THERE'S NO BILL, THERE'S NO
THERE'S NO BILL, THERE'S NO POLICY IN EXISTENCE THAT'S 100%
POLICY IN EXISTENCE THAT'S 100% FOOLPROOF BUT WE CAN GO FURTHER
FOOLPROOF BUT WE CAN GO FURTHER THAN WHERE WE ARE.
THAN WHERE WE ARE. RIGHT NOW I THINK WE SHOULD
RIGHT NOW I THINK WE SHOULD ENFORCE THE LAWS ON THE BOOKS,
ENFORCE THE LAWS ON THE BOOKS, AND, YOU KNOW, LET'S ALLOW LEGAL
AND, YOU KNOW, LET'S ALLOW LEGAL IMMIGRATION, THE CORRECT WAY.
IMMIGRATION, THE CORRECT WAY. LET'S ALLOW THAT TO BECOME
LET'S ALLOW THAT TO BECOME EASIER.
EASIER. SO WHERE WE HAVE BACKLOGS, WHERE
SO WHERE WE HAVE BACKLOGS, WHERE WE HAVE LIMITATIONS OF THOSE WHO
WE HAVE LIMITATIONS OF THOSE WHO ARE QUALIFIED FOR H1B VISAS
ARE QUALIFIED FOR H1B VISAS LET'S FIX THE PROGRAMS WE HAVE
LET'S FIX THE PROGRAMS WE HAVE IN PLACE AND SECURE THAT BORDER
IN PLACE AND SECURE THAT BORDER I THINK A LOT OF THESE
I THINK A LOT OF THESE SITUATIONS WILL SOLVE
SITUATIONS WILL SOLVE THEMSELVES.
THEMSELVES. >> IT'S YOUR HOPE PEOPLE ARE NOW
>> IT'S YOUR HOPE PEOPLE ARE NOW IN THE COUNTRY WOULD SELF-DEPORT
IN THE COUNTRY WOULD SELF-DEPORT OR FACE ARREST.
OR FACE ARREST. >> I BELIEVE THAT IF WE HAVE I-9
>> I BELIEVE THAT IF WE HAVE I-9 ENFORCEMENT AND WE HAVE THE
ENFORCEMENT AND WE HAVE THE POLICIES IN PLACE THAT PREVENT
POLICIES IN PLACE THAT PREVENT INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE NOT HERE
INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE NOT HERE LEGALLY FROM ACTUALLY FINDING
LEGALLY FROM ACTUALLY FINDING WORK, THEN I BELIEVE, YES, THEY
WORK, THEN I BELIEVE, YES, THEY WILL GO BACK TO THEIR COUNTRY OF
WILL GO BACK TO THEIR COUNTRY OF ORIGIN.
ORIGIN. >> YOU HAD A FORM LAST WEEK IN
>> YOU HAD A FORM LAST WEEK IN SADDLEBROOK AND YOU SAID SPEAKER
SADDLEBROOK AND YOU SAID SPEAKER ANDY TOBMAN WAS YUKON UNTRUTHFUL
ANDY TOBMAN WAS YUKON UNTRUTHFUL TO THE AUDIENCE WHEN HE SAID HE
TO THE AUDIENCE WHEN HE SAID HE OPPOSED OBAMACARE.
OPPOSED OBAMACARE. WHY DID YOU SAY THE SPEAKER WAS
WHY DID YOU SAY THE SPEAKER WAS LYING?
LYING? >> THERE'S A THING.
>> THERE'S A THING. WHETHER YOU'RE A REPUBLICAN OR A
WHETHER YOU'RE A REPUBLICAN OR A DEMOCRAT PEOPLE WHO WANT TO
DEMOCRAT PEOPLE WHO WANT TO ELECT OTHERS, THEY HAVE TO LIST
ELECT OTHERS, THEY HAVE TO LIST THEIR RECORD AND SEE WHAT
THEIR RECORD AND SEE WHAT THEY'VE DONE.
THEY'VE DONE. I'M ASKING FOR A JOB.
I'M ASKING FOR A JOB. I PLACED THESE ON MY RESUME WHEN
I PLACED THESE ON MY RESUME WHEN I APPLY FOR A JOB.
I APPLY FOR A JOB. I GO TO A POTENTIAL BOSS AND SAY
I GO TO A POTENTIAL BOSS AND SAY LOOK WHAT I'VE DONE, LOOK WHAT I
LOOK WHAT I'VE DONE, LOOK WHAT I HAVEN'T DONE.
HAVEN'T DONE. ANDY TOBMAN BECAUSE HE VOTED
ANDY TOBMAN BECAUSE HE VOTED AGAINST THE GOVERNOR'S PLAN FOR
AGAINST THE GOVERNOR'S PLAN FOR MEDICAID EXPANSION YOU CAN'T
MEDICAID EXPANSION YOU CAN'T IGNORE THE FACT THAT HE WROTE
IGNORE THE FACT THAT HE WROTE HIS OWN MEDICAID EXPANSION PLAN.
HIS OWN MEDICAID EXPANSION PLAN. HE WROTE HIS OWN OBAMACARE PLAN.
HE WROTE HIS OWN OBAMACARE PLAN. HE FLOATED IT.
HE FLOATED IT. IT WAS IN THE NEWSPAPERS.
IT WAS IN THE NEWSPAPERS. HE WAS QUOTED IN ARTICLES ABOUT
HE WAS QUOTED IN ARTICLES ABOUT IT.
IT. HE TRIED TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE
HE TRIED TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE GOVERNOR FOR OBAMACARE.
GOVERNOR FOR OBAMACARE. I DON'T BELIEVE WE SHOULD HAVE
I DON'T BELIEVE WE SHOULD HAVE ANY NEGOTIATION WHEN IT COMES TO
ANY NEGOTIATION WHEN IT COMES TO OBAMACARE.
OBAMACARE. WE SHOULD REJECT THAT WHOLE
WE SHOULD REJECT THAT WHOLE CLAUSE.
CLAUSE. AS A CONSERVATIVE WE BELIEVE IN
AS A CONSERVATIVE WE BELIEVE IN FREE MARKET ALTERNATIVES.
FREE MARKET ALTERNATIVES. NOT BIGGER GOVERNMENT THAT WILL
NOT BIGGER GOVERNMENT THAT WILL BANKRUPT US.
BANKRUPT US. IN FACT ANDY TOBMAN'S PLAN HE
IN FACT ANDY TOBMAN'S PLAN HE FLOATED THAT'S PUBLISHED IN THE
FLOATED THAT'S PUBLISHED IN THE NEWSPAPER TAXES HOSPITALS AT A
NEWSPAPER TAXES HOSPITALS AT A GRATER RATE THAN THE GOVERNOR
GRATER RATE THAN THE GOVERNOR DID AND HE SAYS BECAUSE HE VOTED
DID AND HE SAYS BECAUSE HE VOTED AGAINST THE GOVERNOR'S PLAN HE
AGAINST THE GOVERNOR'S PLAN HE WAS AGAINST MEDICAID EXPANSION.
WAS AGAINST MEDICAID EXPANSION. IT'S NOT HONEST.
IT'S NOT HONEST. WE HAVE TO ANSWER TO WHAT WE'VE
WE HAVE TO ANSWER TO WHAT WE'VE DONE FOR BETTER OR WORSE BECAUSE
DONE FOR BETTER OR WORSE BECAUSE WE'RE APPLYING FOR A JOB AND I
WE'RE APPLYING FOR A JOB AND I JUST DON'T -- I DON'T SEE IT AS
JUST DON'T -- I DON'T SEE IT AS LEGITIMATE OR HONEST TO SAY HEY
LEGITIMATE OR HONEST TO SAY HEY I DID THIS BUT I WAS AGAINST IT
I DID THIS BUT I WAS AGAINST IT THE WHOLE TIME.
THE WHOLE TIME. ITS JUST NOT RIGHT.
ITS JUST NOT RIGHT. >> WE'LL HAVE TO LEAVE IT.
>> WE'LL HAVE TO LEAVE IT. I APPRECIATE YOU COME BIG THE
I APPRECIATE YOU COME BIG THE STUDIO TODAY AND WE'LL BE RIGHT
STUDIO TODAY AND WE'LL BE RIGHT BACK WITH OUR ROUNDTABLE
BACK WITH OUR ROUNDTABLE CONVERSATION.
>>> EARLIER THIS WEEK GOVERNOR JAN BREWER STROEED SB 1062 WHICH
JAN BREWER STROEED SB 1062 WHICH WOULD HAVE ALLOWED INDIVIDUALS
WOULD HAVE ALLOWED INDIVIDUALS AND BUSINESSES THE RIGHT TO
AND BUSINESSES THE RIGHT TO REFUSE TO PROVIDE SERVICES TO
REFUSE TO PROVIDE SERVICES TO CERTAIN CUSTOMERS ON RELIGIOUS
CERTAIN CUSTOMERS ON RELIGIOUS GROUNDS.
GROUNDS. THE LEGISLATION PUT THE STATE IN
THE LEGISLATION PUT THE STATE IN THE NATIONAL SPOTLIGHT AND WAS
THE NATIONAL SPOTLIGHT AND WAS WIDELY PO LLY OPPOSED BY GAYS A
WIDELY PO LLY OPPOSED BY GAYS A BLAENS AND OTHERS.
BLAENS AND OTHERS. JOINING US TO TALK ABOUT THIS IS
JOINING US TO TALK ABOUT THIS IS BRUCE ASH AND DON?
BRUCE ASH AND DON? JORGE JENSEN
JORGE JENSEN JORGENSON.
JORGENSON. >> THE BILL DIDN'T FEEL RIGHT.
>> THE BILL DIDN'T FEEL RIGHT. THE BILL HAS MERITS.
THE BILL HAS MERITS. THIS WAS ILL TIMED.
THIS WAS ILL TIMED. IT WAS AN OVER REACTION I THINK
IT WAS AN OVER REACTION I THINK TO CERTAIN PARTS OF OBAMACARE,
TO CERTAIN PARTS OF OBAMACARE, WHICH HAVE HAD AN IMPACT ON
WHICH HAVE HAD AN IMPACT ON ORGANIZATIONS OF CONSCIENCE.
ORGANIZATIONS OF CONSCIENCE. THIS WAS NOT THE TIME TO DO SUCH
THIS WAS NOT THE TIME TO DO SUCH A THING.
A THING. THE GOVERNOR ACTUALLY, I THINK,
THE GOVERNOR ACTUALLY, I THINK, VETOED THE SAME BILL TWICE IN
VETOED THE SAME BILL TWICE IN THE PAST.
THE PAST. CAME UP AGAIN.
CAME UP AGAIN. THERE WASN'T AS MUCH IN THE NEWS
THERE WASN'T AS MUCH IN THE NEWS AT THE TIME.
AT THE TIME. THE LGBT COMMUNITY, I THINK,
THE LGBT COMMUNITY, I THINK, JUST HAD A FIELD DAY AND IT
JUST HAD A FIELD DAY AND IT REALLY GOT EVERYBODY'S EMOTION
REALLY GOT EVERYBODY'S EMOTION UP.
UP. I WOULD ASK THIS QUESTION.
I WOULD ASK THIS QUESTION. I'M JEWISH.
I'M JEWISH. MEMBERS OF THE ORTHODOX
MEMBERS OF THE ORTHODOX COMMUNITY WOULD HAVE A HARD TIME
COMMUNITY WOULD HAVE A HARD TIME IF YOU LOOKED AT ALL THE FACTS
IF YOU LOOKED AT ALL THE FACTS AND SO ON OF 1062 IF A RELIGIOUS
AND SO ON OF 1062 IF A RELIGIOUS MAN, AN ORTHODOX MAN WAS
MAN, AN ORTHODOX MAN WAS REQUIRED TO BAKE A CAKE AND
REQUIRED TO BAKE A CAKE AND DELIVER IT ON SATURDAY, IS THE
DELIVER IT ON SATURDAY, IS THE GOVERNMENT GOING TO FORCE HIM TO
GOVERNMENT GOING TO FORCE HIM TO DO THAT BECAUSE HIS RELIGIOUS
DO THAT BECAUSE HIS RELIGIOUS BELIEFS DON'T PERMIT HIM?
BELIEFS DON'T PERMIT HIM? THESE ARE VERY, VERY DIFFICULT
THESE ARE VERY, VERY DIFFICULT AREAS.
AREAS. THIS BILL, AGAIN, WAS THROWN
THIS BILL, AGAIN, WAS THROWN TOGETHER WITHOUT ANY TYPE OF
TOGETHER WITHOUT ANY TYPE OF DISCRIMINATION INTO GETTING THE
DISCRIMINATION INTO GETTING THE BILL RIGHT AND TO REALLY TALKING
BILL RIGHT AND TO REALLY TALKING ABOUT THE ISSUES.
ABOUT THE ISSUES. THIS WAS AN ISSUE NOT IN SEARCH
THIS WAS AN ISSUE NOT IN SEARCH OF A SOLUTION.
OF A SOLUTION. IT WAS A SOLUTION IN SEARCH OF
IT WAS A SOLUTION IN SEARCH OF AN ISSUE.
AN ISSUE. WE DIDN'T NEED THIS BILL RIGHT
WE DIDN'T NEED THIS BILL RIGHT NOW.
NOW. >> WE'RE GOING TO TALK ABOUT
>> WE'RE GOING TO TALK ABOUT THIS IN MUCH MORE DEPTH LATER
THIS IN MUCH MORE DEPTH LATER THIS EVENING ON "ARIZONA WEEK."
THIS EVENING ON "ARIZONA WEEK." THE BACKLASH WAS REMARKABLE TO
THE BACKLASH WAS REMARKABLE TO WITNESS.
WITNESS. WHY DO YOU THINK THERE WAS SUCH
WHY DO YOU THINK THERE WAS SUCH A BACKLASH AFTER THE BILL
A BACKLASH AFTER THE BILL PASSED?
PASSED? >> WELL IT WAS DISCRIMINATION
>> WELL IT WAS DISCRIMINATION AND DISCRIMINATION IN A LOT OF
AND DISCRIMINATION IN A LOT OF WAYS AND I THINK THERE WERE
WAYS AND I THINK THERE WERE THREE DIFFERENT AREAS OF FOCUS
THREE DIFFERENT AREAS OF FOCUS OR INTEREST GROUPS THAT WERE
OR INTEREST GROUPS THAT WERE REALLY ALIGNED.
REALLY ALIGNED. THE FOLKS THAT WERE CONSCIOUS OF
THE FOLKS THAT WERE CONSCIOUS OF AN EROSION OF RIGHTS THAT HAVE
AN EROSION OF RIGHTS THAT HAVE BEEN OCCURRING OVER AND OVER IN
BEEN OCCURRING OVER AND OVER IN THE ARIZONA LEGISLATURE SEVERAL
THE ARIZONA LEGISLATURE SEVERAL BILLS ATTACKING VOTING RIGHTS,
BILLS ATTACKING VOTING RIGHTS, WOMEN RIGHTS AND HERE LGBT
WOMEN RIGHTS AND HERE LGBT RIGHTS, FOLKS WHO HAVE THEIR
RIGHTS, FOLKS WHO HAVE THEIR RADAR UP ABOUT DISCRIMINATION
RADAR UP ABOUT DISCRIMINATION BILLS THANKS TO SB 1070
BILLS THANKS TO SB 1070 PREVIOUSLY AND NOW 1062.
PREVIOUSLY AND NOW 1062. THE GROUPS THAT ARE WATCHDOG
THE GROUPS THAT ARE WATCHDOG GROUPS LOOKING FOR THAT HAD
GROUPS LOOKING FOR THAT HAD THEIR EYE ON IT.
THEIR EYE ON IT. THIRD THE BUSINESS INTEREST FROM
THIRD THE BUSINESS INTEREST FROM THE ARIZONA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
THE ARIZONA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE TO THE NFL ON DOWN WHO REALIZED
TO THE NFL ON DOWN WHO REALIZED THAT PASSING THAT BILL WOULD
THAT PASSING THAT BILL WOULD HAVE CATASTROPHIC ECONOMIC
HAVE CATASTROPHIC ECONOMIC EFFECTS ON THE STATE.
EFFECTS ON THE STATE. ALL THOSE GROUPS KIND OF ALIGNED
ALL THOSE GROUPS KIND OF ALIGNED AGAINST IT AND BECAUSE OF
AGAINST IT AND BECAUSE OF ARIZONA'S HISTORY OF BAD BILLS
ARIZONA'S HISTORY OF BAD BILLS RECENTLY, THEY HAVE BEEN
RECENTLY, THEY HAVE BEEN WATCHING IT.
WATCHING IT. IT DIDN'T COME OUT OF NOWHERE.
IT DIDN'T COME OUT OF NOWHERE. THIS IS A BILL THAT HAD BEEN
THIS IS A BILL THAT HAD BEEN BROUGHT FORTH IN VARIOUS FORMS
BROUGHT FORTH IN VARIOUS FORMS IN ABOUT TEN OTHER STATES.
IN ABOUT TEN OTHER STATES. THIS WAS A NATIONAL EFFORT TO
THIS WAS A NATIONAL EFFORT TO PROMOTE THAT TYPE OF RELIGIOUS
PROMOTE THAT TYPE OF RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION, AND THIS TIME
DISCRIMINATION, AND THIS TIME THESE GROUPS THAT WERE PREPARING
THESE GROUPS THAT WERE PREPARING FOR IT WERE READY.
FOR IT WERE READY. >> ONE OF THE GROUPS BEHIND THIS
>> ONE OF THE GROUPS BEHIND THIS WAS CENTER FOR ARIZONA POLICY
WAS CENTER FOR ARIZONA POLICY SWAY POWERFUL CHRISTIAN
SWAY POWERFUL CHRISTIAN CONSERVATIVE LOBBYING
CONSERVATIVE LOBBYING ORGANIZATION AND THE HEAD OF
ORGANIZATION AND THE HEAD OF THAT IS KATHY HAROD.
THAT IS KATHY HAROD. DO YOU THINK SHE LOST SOME OF
DO YOU THINK SHE LOST SOME OF HER INFLUENCE AMONG LAWMAKERS?
HER INFLUENCE AMONG LAWMAKERS? >> I THINK THE TIMING WAS BAD.
>> I THINK THE TIMING WAS BAD. I DISAGREE WITH DON THAT WAS
I DISAGREE WITH DON THAT WAS DISCRIMINATION BILL ANY MORE
DISCRIMINATION BILL ANY MORE THAN 1070 WAS.
THAN 1070 WAS. ILL CONCEIVED PERHAPS, NOT
ILL CONCEIVED PERHAPS, NOT THOUGHT OUT IN THE POLITICAL
THOUGHT OUT IN THE POLITICAL SENSE.
SENSE. THIS IS AN ELECTION YEAR.
THIS IS AN ELECTION YEAR. GENERALLY DON'T EXPECT TO SEE
GENERALLY DON'T EXPECT TO SEE SOMETHING LIKE THIS COME UP THAT
SOMETHING LIKE THIS COME UP THAT COULD BUBBLE UP AND CREATE SUCH
COULD BUBBLE UP AND CREATE SUCH A PROBLEM.
A PROBLEM. I'M NOT SURE THAT I WANT TO BE
I'M NOT SURE THAT I WANT TO BE IN CHARGE OF THE POLITICAL
IN CHARGE OF THE POLITICAL STRATEGIES RIGHT NOW AT THE
STRATEGIES RIGHT NOW AT THE ARIZONA LEGISLATURE.
ARIZONA LEGISLATURE. THIS WAS NOT VERY GOOD STRATEGY.
THIS WAS NOT VERY GOOD STRATEGY. WE CAN ARGUE ALL WE WANT,
WE CAN ARGUE ALL WE WANT, WHETHER THERE WAS DISCRIMINATORY
WHETHER THERE WAS DISCRIMINATORY OR NOT.
OR NOT. THE GOVERNOR DIDN'T SIGN IT.
THE GOVERNOR DIDN'T SIGN IT. IT'S NOT LAW.
IT'S NOT LAW. THESE OTHER STATES WHO LOOKED AT
THESE OTHER STATES WHO LOOKED AT THIS AND NOBODY HAS GOT IT RIGHT
THIS AND NOBODY HAS GOT IT RIGHT YET.
YET. >> DON YOU MENTIONED ABORTION
>> DON YOU MENTIONED ABORTION RIGHTS EARLIER AND CENTER FOR
RIGHTS EARLIER AND CENTER FOR ARIZONA POLICY HAS ANOTHER BILL
ARIZONA POLICY HAS ANOTHER BILL THAT WOULD ALLOW UNANNOUNCED
THAT WOULD ALLOW UNANNOUNCED INSPECTIONS OF ABORTION CLINICS.
INSPECTIONS OF ABORTION CLINICS. THIS IS ON THE VERGE OF PASSING
THIS IS ON THE VERGE OF PASSING THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.
THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. I WANT SEEMS THAT CAT HAS SOME
I WANT SEEMS THAT CAT HAS SOME JUICE.
JUICE. >> SHE HAD A BAD WEEK BECAUSE
>> SHE HAD A BAD WEEK BECAUSE THEIR PREVIOUS BILL ATTACKING
THEIR PREVIOUS BILL ATTACKING PLANNED PARENTHOOD WAS THROWN
PLANNED PARENTHOOD WAS THROWN OUT BY THE U.S. SUPREME COURT.
OUT BY THE U.S. SUPREME COURT. IN THIS CURRENT BILL THAT AS YOU
IN THIS CURRENT BILL THAT AS YOU SAY WANTING TO ALLOW UNANNOUNCED
SAY WANTING TO ALLOW UNANNOUNCED WARRANTLESS INSPECTIONS OF
WARRANTLESS INSPECTIONS OF ABORTION CLINICS IS ESSENTIALLY
ABORTION CLINICS IS ESSENTIALLY A REHASH OF A BILL THAT WAS
A REHASH OF A BILL THAT WAS PASSED TEN YEARS AGO AND THROWN
PASSED TEN YEARS AGO AND THROWN OUT BY THE COURTS THEN.
OUT BY THE COURTS THEN. IT IS SIMPLY ANOTHER SCARE
IT IS SIMPLY ANOTHER SCARE TACTIC FOR WOMEN THAT ARE
TACTIC FOR WOMEN THAT ARE SEEKING THE NEED OF THESE
SEEKING THE NEED OF THESE CLINICS FOR EVERYTHING FROM
CLINICS FOR EVERYTHING FROM BREAST CANCER SCREENINGS TO
BREAST CANCER SCREENINGS TO ABORTION TO PREVENTATIVE HEALTH.
ABORTION TO PREVENTATIVE HEALTH. EVEN IF THE GOVERNOR SIGNS IT
EVEN IF THE GOVERNOR SIGNS IT WE'RE LOOKING AT ANOTHER LAWSUIT
WE'RE LOOKING AT ANOTHER LAWSUIT AND MORE TAXPAYER MONEY WASTED.
AND MORE TAXPAYER MONEY WASTED. >> WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THIS
>> WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THIS LEGISLATION?
LEGISLATION? >> I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM HEALTH
>> I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM HEALTH OFFICIALS DOING WHAT THEY ARE
OFFICIALS DOING WHAT THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO THE MAKE SURE
SUPPOSED TO THE MAKE SURE THERE'S A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT
THERE'S A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT THAT EXISTS IN THESE VARIOUS
THAT EXISTS IN THESE VARIOUS CLINICS.
CLINICS. IT'S NOT UNFAIR TO WOMEN FOR
IT'S NOT UNFAIR TO WOMEN FOR THAT TO HAPPEN AND NOBODY NEEDS
THAT TO HAPPEN AND NOBODY NEEDS A WARRANT TO DO THAT.
A WARRANT TO DO THAT. FRANKLY ANY PROPERTY, MY COMPANY
FRANKLY ANY PROPERTY, MY COMPANY OPERATES IS SUBJECT TO
OPERATES IS SUBJECT TO INSPECTION AT ANY TIME FOR ANY
INSPECTION AT ANY TIME FOR ANY REASON THAT ANYBODY WANTS.
REASON THAT ANYBODY WANTS. PUBLIC OFFICES SHOULDN'T BE
PUBLIC OFFICES SHOULDN'T BE EXEMPT FROM ANY SCRUTINY WHEN
EXEMPT FROM ANY SCRUTINY WHEN THEY COME UNDER THE JURISDICTION
THEY COME UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE STATE GOVERNMENT OR THE
OF THE STATE GOVERNMENT OR THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. >> DON, THE CONCERN FROM PLANNED
>> DON, THE CONCERN FROM PLANNED PARENTHOOD IS NOT THAT THE
PARENTHOOD IS NOT THAT THE CURRENT HEALTH DEPARTMENT WOULD
CURRENT HEALTH DEPARTMENT WOULD HAVE PROBLEMS WITH THEM BECAUSE
HAVE PROBLEMS WITH THEM BECAUSE THEY SAY THEY HAVE A GOOD
THEY SAY THEY HAVE A GOOD RELATIONSHIP WITH OFFICIALS
RELATIONSHIP WITH OFFICIALS THERE NOW BUT THEY ARE AFRAID IT
THERE NOW BUT THEY ARE AFRAID IT WOULD BE POLITICAL SITUATION
WOULD BE POLITICAL SITUATION WHERE THE SURPRISE INSPECTIONS
WHERE THE SURPRISE INSPECTIONS WOULD BECOME VERY ROUTINE.
WOULD BECOME VERY ROUTINE. >> ABSOLUTELY.
>> ABSOLUTELY. IT'S NOT A GOVERNMENT OFFICE,
IT'S NOT A GOVERNMENT OFFICE, THESE ARE PRIVATE OFFICES.
THESE ARE PRIVATE OFFICES. BRUCE RUNS A TERRIFIC BUSINESS
BRUCE RUNS A TERRIFIC BUSINESS BUT IT DOESN'T INVOLVE HEALTH
BUT IT DOESN'T INVOLVE HEALTH CARE PRIVACY AND WOMEN'S
CARE PRIVACY AND WOMEN'S PRIVACY.
PRIVACY. THEY HAVE A THE RIGHT PRIVACY,
THEY HAVE A THE RIGHT PRIVACY, THE DOCTORS HAVE A RIGHT TO
THE DOCTORS HAVE A RIGHT TO PRIVACY.
PRIVACY. THIS IS NOTHING MORE THAN,
THIS IS NOTHING MORE THAN, AGAIN, A WAY TO BRING MORE
AGAIN, A WAY TO BRING MORE ATTENTION TO THESE ABORTION
ATTENTION TO THESE ABORTION CLINICS AND ANOTHER KIND OF STEP
CLINICS AND ANOTHER KIND OF STEP THAT THESE RIGHT-WING CHRISTIAN
THAT THESE RIGHT-WING CHRISTIAN GROUPS ARE TAKING TO TRY TO
GROUPS ARE TAKING TO TRY TO ELIMINATE THAT LEGAL RIGHT OF
ELIMINATE THAT LEGAL RIGHT OF WOMEN TO SEEK ABORTION IN
WOMEN TO SEEK ABORTION IN ARIZONA.
ARIZONA. >> YOU MENTIONED THAT SUPREME
>> YOU MENTIONED THAT SUPREME COURT DECISION, NOT A DECISION
COURT DECISION, NOT A DECISION BUT THE COURT'S DECISION NOT TO
BUT THE COURT'S DECISION NOT TO REVIEW THE CASE IN ARIZONA THAT
REVIEW THE CASE IN ARIZONA THAT HAD BEEN REJECTED BY THE FEDERAL
HAD BEEN REJECTED BY THE FEDERAL COURTS EARLIER, AN ARIZONA LAW
COURTS EARLIER, AN ARIZONA LAW THAT SAID NONE OF THE FEDERAL
THAT SAID NONE OF THE FEDERAL HEALTH DOLLARS THAT WERE PASSING
HEALTH DOLLARS THAT WERE PASSING THROUGH THE STATE COULD GO TO
THROUGH THE STATE COULD GO TO PLANNED PARENTHOOD CLINICS TO
PLANNED PARENTHOOD CLINICS TO PROVIDE OTHER THAN ABORTION
PROVIDE OTHER THAN ABORTION CARE, CANCER SCREENINGS OR STD
CARE, CANCER SCREENINGS OR STD TREATMENTS OR BIRTH CONTROL AND
TREATMENTS OR BIRTH CONTROL AND THEY TRIED TO SAY THAT PLANNED
THEY TRIED TO SAY THAT PLANNED PARENTHOOD WAS NOT QUALIFIED TO
PARENTHOOD WAS NOT QUALIFIED TO RECEIVE THESE FUNDS AND THE
RECEIVE THESE FUNDS AND THE COURT SAID YOU CAN'T DEFINE
COURT SAID YOU CAN'T DEFINE QUALIFIED IN THAT MANNER.
QUALIFIED IN THAT MANNER. >> THAT'S CORRECT.
>> THAT'S CORRECT. THAT WAS THE PLANNED PARENTHOOD
THAT WAS THE PLANNED PARENTHOOD POSITION THEY WERE QUALIFIED.
POSITION THEY WERE QUALIFIED. AND THE FEDERAL LAW SAID THE
AND THE FEDERAL LAW SAID THE STATE COULD NOT REFUSE TO PASS
STATE COULD NOT REFUSE TO PASS THROUGH THOSE DOLLARS TO ANY
THROUGH THOSE DOLLARS TO ANY QUALIFIED PROVIDER.
QUALIFIED PROVIDER. THEY WANTED TO STATE THAT THESE
THEY WANTED TO STATE THAT THESE CLINICS WERE UNQUALIFIED SIMPLY
CLINICS WERE UNQUALIFIED SIMPLY BECAUSE THEY ALSO PROVIDE
BECAUSE THEY ALSO PROVIDE ABORTION SERVICES AND AS YOU
ABORTION SERVICES AND AS YOU SAID THE COURTS THREW THAT OUT.
SAID THE COURTS THREW THAT OUT. >> BRUCE, THIS IS NOT THE FIRST
>> BRUCE, THIS IS NOT THE FIRST STATE TO GO DOWN THIS ROAD AND
STATE TO GO DOWN THIS ROAD AND THE COURT THAT PRETTY WELL
THE COURT THAT PRETTY WELL ESTABLISHED THIS WAS THE
ESTABLISHED THIS WAS THE PRECEDENT.
PRECEDENT. DO YOU THINK ARIZONA MADE A
DO YOU THINK ARIZONA MADE A MISTAKE BY SPENDING SO MUCH
MISTAKE BY SPENDING SO MUCH MONEY TO NIGHT ONE?
MONEY TO NIGHT ONE? >> NO PLANNED PARENTHOOD IS THE
>> NO PLANNED PARENTHOOD IS THE CHIEF LEADER ON THE WAR ON WOMEN
CHIEF LEADER ON THE WAR ON WOMEN AND AGAINST MINORITIES FROM THE
AND AGAINST MINORITIES FROM THE OUT SET THAT THE ORGANIZATION
OUT SET THAT THE ORGANIZATION WAS FORMED.
WAS FORMED. AND WHEN MILLIONS AND MILLIONS
AND WHEN MILLIONS AND MILLIONS OF DOLLARS, TAXPAYER DOLLARS ARE
OF DOLLARS, TAXPAYER DOLLARS ARE GOING TO PLANNED PARENTHOOD
GOING TO PLANNED PARENTHOOD SUPPOSEDLY TO DO BREAST CANCER
SUPPOSEDLY TO DO BREAST CANCER SCREENINGS AND THE REST IT'S
SCREENINGS AND THE REST IT'S REALLY GOING TO ABORTIONS.
REALLY GOING TO ABORTIONS. THEY CAN SEGREGATE THE DOLLARS
THEY CAN SEGREGATE THE DOLLARS HOWEVER THEY WANT.
HOWEVER THEY WANT. AT THE END OF THE DAY, IT'S
AT THE END OF THE DAY, IT'S FUNDING ABORTIONS AND THAT'S, I
FUNDING ABORTIONS AND THAT'S, I THINK, NOT A GOOD THING.
THINK, NOT A GOOD THING. MILLIONS OF BABIES ABORTED OVER
MILLIONS OF BABIES ABORTED OVER SEVERAL DECADES.
SEVERAL DECADES. >> THOUSANDS OF WOMEN GO TO
>> THOUSANDS OF WOMEN GO TO PLANNED PARENTHOOD, THEIR ONLY
PLANNED PARENTHOOD, THEIR ONLY OPTION FOR PREVENTATIVE HEALTH
OPTION FOR PREVENTATIVE HEALTH SERVICES AND WOMEN'S HEALTH
SERVICES AND WOMEN'S HEALTH SERVICE OF ALL RACES, OF ALL
SERVICE OF ALL RACES, OF ALL SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS.
SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS. TO SAY THAT THEY ARE PROMOTERS
TO SAY THAT THEY ARE PROMOTERS OF WAR ON WOMEN IS SAYING UP IS
OF WAR ON WOMEN IS SAYING UP IS DOWN.
DOWN. IT'S JUST NOT CORRECT.
IT'S JUST NOT CORRECT. >> I'M SURE WE'RE NOT GOING TO
>> I'M SURE WE'RE NOT GOING TO SETTLE THAT ONE AT THIS TABLE
SETTLE THAT ONE AT THIS TABLE TODAY.
TODAY. EARLIER WE HAD STATE
EARLIER WE HAD STATE REPRESENTATIVE KWASMAN AND HIS
REPRESENTATIVE KWASMAN AND HIS CAMPAIGN.
CAMPAIGN. YOU HAVE THREE REPUBLICANS
YOU HAVE THREE REPUBLICANS RUNNING IN THAT DISTRICT.
RUNNING IN THAT DISTRICT. AND GARY KEENY WHO IS A NEWCOMER
AND GARY KEENY WHO IS A NEWCOMER TO POLITICS.
TO POLITICS. I SAW THEM DEBATE LAST WEEK UP
I SAW THEM DEBATE LAST WEEK UP IN SADDLEBROOK.
IN SADDLEBROOK. MR. KEENY HAS THIS FOLKSY CHARM
MR. KEENY HAS THIS FOLKSY CHARM HE WAS TRYING TO EXPRESS AND
HE WAS TRYING TO EXPRESS AND SAYING THE OTHER TWO ARE CAREER
SAYING THE OTHER TWO ARE CAREER POLITICIANS.
POLITICIANS. BRUCE HOW DO YOU READ THIS RACE
BRUCE HOW DO YOU READ THIS RACE AND HOW IT'S GOING UP THERE?
AND HOW IT'S GOING UP THERE? >> KEENY WILL RAISE A LOT OF
>> KEENY WILL RAISE A LOT OF MONEY.
MONEY. OTHER TWO HAVE RAISED A LOT OF
OTHER TWO HAVE RAISED A LOT OF MONEY.
MONEY. THERE'S AN AWFUL LOT OF FOLKS
THERE'S AN AWFUL LOT OF FOLKS WHO ARE DISSATISFIED WITH ANN
WHO ARE DISSATISFIED WITH ANN KIRKPATRICK, HER STAND ON
KIRKPATRICK, HER STAND ON OBAMACARE, HER CONTINUED SUPPORT
OBAMACARE, HER CONTINUED SUPPORT OF OBAMACARE, OBAMACARE IS NOT
OF OBAMACARE, OBAMACARE IS NOT POPULAR AT ALL IN CD 1.
POPULAR AT ALL IN CD 1. WHICHEVER CANDIDATE, I THINK, IS
WHICHEVER CANDIDATE, I THINK, IS MOST ABLE TO CONNECT WITH VOTERS
MOST ABLE TO CONNECT WITH VOTERS WILL BE THE ONE THAT WINS THIS
WILL BE THE ONE THAT WINS THIS ELECTION.
ELECTION. IT'S GOING TO BE A HORSE RACE
IT'S GOING TO BE A HORSE RACE ALL THE WAY UNTIL THE END.
ALL THE WAY UNTIL THE END. KEENY GOT INTIGHT LITTLE LATE.
KEENY GOT INTIGHT LITTLE LATE. HE'S RAISED A LOT OF MONEY.
HE'S RAISED A LOT OF MONEY. HE'S TRAVELING EVERY WHERE
HE'S TRAVELING EVERY WHERE AROUND THE DISTRICT TO MEET
AROUND THE DISTRICT TO MEET PEOPLE AND SEEMS TO BE MAKING A
PEOPLE AND SEEMS TO BE MAKING A PRETTY GOOD NAME FOR HIMSELF.
PRETTY GOOD NAME FOR HIMSELF. >> A RODEO COWBOY.
>> A RODEO COWBOY. HAS PHOTOS OUT THERE OF HIM
HAS PHOTOS OUT THERE OF HIM ROPING CALVES.
ROPING CALVES. >> IT'S AUTHENTIC IN THAT
>> IT'S AUTHENTIC IN THAT DISTRICT.
DISTRICT. LOOK, ADAM HAS SERVED HIS
LOOK, ADAM HAS SERVED HIS CONSTITUENTS WHO ARE PART OF CD
CONSTITUENTS WHO ARE PART OF CD 1 AS WELL.
1 AS WELL. AS HAS ANDY SERVING AS SPEAKER
AS HAS ANDY SERVING AS SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE.
OF THE HOUSE. HE'S BEEN AROUND FOR A LONG TIME
HE'S BEEN AROUND FOR A LONG TIME AND HANDLED VERY GOOD
AND HANDLED VERY GOOD LEGISLATION FOR THE BENEFIT OF
LEGISLATION FOR THE BENEFIT OF ALL ARIZONANS.
ALL ARIZONANS. >> THEY SAY IT'S A TOUGH YEAR
>> THEY SAY IT'S A TOUGH YEAR FOR DEMOCRATS.
FOR DEMOCRATS. PRESIDENT'S SIXTH YEAR,
PRESIDENT'S SIXTH YEAR, MID-TERM.
MID-TERM. DIFFERENT ELECTORATE TURNING
DIFFERENT ELECTORATE TURNING OUT.
OUT. ANN KIRKPATRICK WON THAT RACE BY
ANN KIRKPATRICK WON THAT RACE BY FIVE OR SIX PERCENTAGE POINTS.
FIVE OR SIX PERCENTAGE POINTS. HOW DOES SHE WIN THIS TIME OUT?
HOW DOES SHE WIN THIS TIME OUT? >> IT'S A COMPETITIVE DISTRICT.
>> IT'S A COMPETITIVE DISTRICT. EVERY TWO YEARS WILL BE A
EVERY TWO YEARS WILL BE A CHALLENGE.
CHALLENGE. I THINK SHE CAN RUN ON HER
I THINK SHE CAN RUN ON HER RECORD, FREEZE WARNINGLY.
RECORD, FREEZE WARNINGLY. SHE'S PROVEN HER STOEFBL A
SHE'S PROVEN HER STOEFBL A MODERATE.
MODERATE. SHE'S WORKED IN A BIPARTISAN WAY
SHE'S WORKED IN A BIPARTISAN WAY ON MANY ISSUES RELATED TO JOBS,
ON MANY ISSUES RELATED TO JOBS, VETERANS BENEFITS.
VETERANS BENEFITS. SHE WAS THE ONLY CONGRESSIONAL
SHE WAS THE ONLY CONGRESSIONAL DEMOCRAT FROM ARIZONA TO PASS A
DEMOCRAT FROM ARIZONA TO PASS A BILL AND THAT WAS REDUCING THE
BILL AND THAT WAS REDUCING THE VA BACKLOG.
VA BACKLOG. SHE KNOWS THAT DISTRICT.
SHE KNOWS THAT DISTRICT. IT'S RURAL.
IT'S RURAL. IT'S VERY DIFFERENT.
IT'S VERY DIFFERENT. THAT WILL BE A CHALLENGE FOR
THAT WILL BE A CHALLENGE FOR WHOEVER COMES OUT OF THE
WHOEVER COMES OUT OF THE REPUBLICAN PRIMARY TO SHIFT FROM
REPUBLICAN PRIMARY TO SHIFT FROM RUNNING TO THE FAR RIGHT TO WIN
RUNNING TO THE FAR RIGHT TO WIN THE PRIMARY BACK TO THE MODERATE
THE PRIMARY BACK TO THE MODERATE AREA.
AREA. BUT THEN THEY ARE FACING
BUT THEN THEY ARE FACING CONGRESSWOMAN KIRKPATRICK WHICH
CONGRESSWOMAN KIRKPATRICK WHICH HAS SUPPORTED OBAMACARE PROUDLY
HAS SUPPORTED OBAMACARE PROUDLY BECAUSE IT REPRESENTED TENS AND
BECAUSE IT REPRESENTED TENS AND TENS OF THOUSANDS OF ARIZONANS
TENS OF THOUSANDS OF ARIZONANS HAVING ACCESS TO HEALTH CARE FOR
HAVING ACCESS TO HEALTH CARE FOR THE FIRST TIME.
THE FIRST TIME. MANY OF THOSE RURAL AND POOR WHO
MANY OF THOSE RURAL AND POOR WHO NOW HAVE HEALTH CARE.
NOW HAVE HEALTH CARE. >> LET'S SHIFT GEARS OVER TO THE
>> LET'S SHIFT GEARS OVER TO THE CITY OF TUCSON, MAYOR ROTHSCHILD
CITY OF TUCSON, MAYOR ROTHSCHILD DELIVERED HIS STATE OF THE CITY
DELIVERED HIS STATE OF THE CITY SPEECH.
SPEECH. SPOKE TO ONE PERSON IN THE
SPOKE TO ONE PERSON IN THE AUDIENCE THEY LEFT OUT TATOOS,
AUDIENCE THEY LEFT OUT TATOOS, TACOS AND TRANSIENTS.
TACOS AND TRANSIENTS. WHAT DO YOU THINK WAS THE
WHAT DO YOU THINK WAS THE IMPORTANT TAKEAWAY FROM THAT
IMPORTANT TAKEAWAY FROM THAT SPEECH?
SPEECH? >> THAT TUCSON IS ON THE RIGHT
>> THAT TUCSON IS ON THE RIGHT TRACK.
TRACK. THE MAYOR HAS DONE A GREAT JOB
THE MAYOR HAS DONE A GREAT JOB IN TWO YEARS.
IN TWO YEARS. IF YOU LOOK AT DOWNTOWN AND WHAT
IF YOU LOOK AT DOWNTOWN AND WHAT DOESN'T EXIST ANY MORE, WHICH IS
DOESN'T EXIST ANY MORE, WHICH IS A REAL DEBACLE.
A REAL DEBACLE. PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS
PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS HAPPENING DOWN THERE TO
HAPPENING DOWN THERE TO REVITALIZE DOWN.
REVITALIZE DOWN. THE STREET CAR HAS RESULTED IN
THE STREET CAR HAS RESULTED IN NEW JOBS AND A LOT OF NEW
NEW JOBS AND A LOT OF NEW INVESTMENT IN TOWN.
INVESTMENT IN TOWN. I THINK HE'S ON THE RIGHT TRACK
I THINK HE'S ON THE RIGHT TRACK WITH REGARD TO OBVIOUSLY TO
WITH REGARD TO OBVIOUSLY TO DISCUSSION ON TOURISM, TO
DISCUSSION ON TOURISM, TO DISCUSSION ON TECHNOLOGY BECAUSE
DISCUSSION ON TECHNOLOGY BECAUSE AS HE'S LEARNED COMPANIES WON'T
AS HE'S LEARNED COMPANIES WON'T RELOCATE TO A CITY BECAUSE YOU
RELOCATE TO A CITY BECAUSE YOU OFFER TAX INCENTIVES.
OFFER TAX INCENTIVES. THEY WILL RELOCATE IF THEIR
THEY WILL RELOCATE IF THEIR WORKERS WANT TO LIVE THERE WHICH
WORKERS WANT TO LIVE THERE WHICH MEANS GOOD SCHOOLS, GOOD ROADS,
MEANS GOOD SCHOOLS, GOOD ROADS, GOOD INFRASTRUCTURE AND THAT'S
GOOD INFRASTRUCTURE AND THAT'S WHAT THE MAYOR IS FOCUSING ON.
WHAT THE MAYOR IS FOCUSING ON. >> BRUCE HALFWAY THROUGH THE
>> BRUCE HALFWAY THROUGH THE MAYOR'S FIRST TERM WHAT KIND OF
MAYOR'S FIRST TERM WHAT KIND OF GRADE DO YOU GIVE HIM
GRADE DO YOU GIVE HIM >> I HAVE A LOT OF RESPECT FOR
>> I HAVE A LOT OF RESPECT FOR HIM.
HIM. HE'S TRYING HIS BEST.
HE'S TRYING HIS BEST. THE DEMOCRATS ON THE CITY
THE DEMOCRATS ON THE CITY COUNCIL CLEARLY BLOCK HIM IN
COUNCIL CLEARLY BLOCK HIM IN MANY THINGS HE WOULD LIKE TO DO.
MANY THINGS HE WOULD LIKE TO DO. WHEN THE ECONOMY WAS THE LOWEST
WHEN THE ECONOMY WAS THE LOWEST ONE THING THE STATE LEGISLATURE
ONE THING THE STATE LEGISLATURE DID WAS PASS A BILL TO LIMIT ANY
DID WAS PASS A BILL TO LIMIT ANY FUTURE REGULATIONS COMING FROM
FUTURE REGULATIONS COMING FROM THE STATE IN ORDER TO HELP
THE STATE IN ORDER TO HELP PROMOTE BUSINESS, STIMULATE JOB
PROMOTE BUSINESS, STIMULATE JOB GROWTH AND SO ON.
GROWTH AND SO ON. I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE SAME
I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE SAME THING HERE IN THE CITY OF
THING HERE IN THE CITY OF TUCSON.
TUCSON. THE COUNCIL HAS TALKED A LOT FOR
THE COUNCIL HAS TALKED A LOT FOR A NUMBER OF YEARS ABOUT BEING
A NUMBER OF YEARS ABOUT BEING PRO BUSINESS.
PRO BUSINESS. IT'S TIME THEY SHOW IT.
IT'S TIME THEY SHOW IT. JONATHAN ROTHSCHILD IS SOMEONE
JONATHAN ROTHSCHILD IS SOMEONE WHO WOULD DO WELL TO PROMOTE
WHO WOULD DO WELL TO PROMOTE THAT.
THAT. >> DEFENSE SECRETARY CHUCK HAGEL
>> DEFENSE SECRETARY CHUCK HAGEL ANNOUNCED HE WANTS TO
ANNOUNCED HE WANTS TO SIGNIFICANTLY SCALE BACK THE
SIGNIFICANTLY SCALE BACK THE ARMED FORCES INCLUDING THE
ARMED FORCES INCLUDING THE ELIMINATION OF THE A-10 FIGHTER
ELIMINATION OF THE A-10 FIGHTER JET.
JET. HUGE IMPACTS AND CONCERNS THAT I
HUGE IMPACTS AND CONCERNS THAT I WANT COULD CLOSE.
WANT COULD CLOSE. BRUCE, DO YOU THINK THE FUTURE
BRUCE, DO YOU THINK THE FUTURE OF THE A-10 IS SHAKY HERE?
OF THE A-10 IS SHAKY HERE? >> I THINK THE FUTURE OF THE
>> I THINK THE FUTURE OF THE A-10 IS LIMITED.
A-10 IS LIMITED. IT WILL BE HERE FOR A WHILE.
IT WILL BE HERE FOR A WHILE. THERE'S NO ALTERNATIVE TO THAT
THERE'S NO ALTERNATIVE TO THAT GROUND SUPPORT ATTACK PLANE AT
GROUND SUPPORT ATTACK PLANE AT THIS TIME.
THIS TIME. WE LACK INFLUENCE IN CONGRESS.
WE LACK INFLUENCE IN CONGRESS. RON BARBER REALLY HAS LITTLE, AT
RON BARBER REALLY HAS LITTLE, AT LEAST LITTLE THAT HE'S WILLING
LEAST LITTLE THAT HE'S WILLING TO EXERCISE.
TO EXERCISE. HE'S AGAINST MOST THINGS THAT
HE'S AGAINST MOST THINGS THAT ARE FOR THE COMMON DEFENSE OF
ARE FOR THE COMMON DEFENSE OF THIS COUNTRY.
THIS COUNTRY. SOMEBODY WHO HAS BOY KOTD,
SOMEBODY WHO HAS BOY KOTD, SANCTIONED BOYCOTTING ARIZONA.
SANCTIONED BOYCOTTING ARIZONA. WE NEED PEOPLE SERVING SOUTHERN
WE NEED PEOPLE SERVING SOUTHERN ARIZONA WHO TRULY HAVE THE
ARIZONA WHO TRULY HAVE THE INTERESTS OF ALL ARIZONANS.
INTERESTS OF ALL ARIZONANS. THERE ARE THOUSANDS OF JOBS
THERE ARE THOUSANDS OF JOBS INVOLVED AND DOESN'T JUST AFFECT
INVOLVED AND DOESN'T JUST AFFECT DAVIS MOUNTAIN, THIS GUT AFFECTS
DAVIS MOUNTAIN, THIS GUT AFFECTS RAYTHEON OWN OTHERS.
RAYTHEON OWN OTHERS. IT'S TIME WE ELECT
IT'S TIME WE ELECT REPRESENTATIVES WHO ARE GOING
REPRESENTATIVES WHO ARE GOING LOOK OUT FOR THE JOBS OF ALL
LOOK OUT FOR THE JOBS OF ALL SOUTHERN ARIZONANS.
SOUTHERN ARIZONANS. >> DON, RON BARBER NOT SHOWING
>> DON, RON BARBER NOT SHOWING ENOUGH INFLUENCE
ENOUGH INFLUENCE >> HE LED THE FIGHT AND HAS LED
>> HE LED THE FIGHT AND HAS LED THE CHARGE TO KEEP THE A-10
THE CHARGE TO KEEP THE A-10 THERE.
THERE. HE WAS SUCCESSFUL IN DELAYING A
HE WAS SUCCESSFUL IN DELAYING A DECISION THROUGH 2014 WHICH KEPT
DECISION THROUGH 2014 WHICH KEPT IT HERE AND GAVE THEM TIME TO
IT HERE AND GAVE THEM TIME TO SEND A LETTER AND MAKE CONTACT
SEND A LETTER AND MAKE CONTACT WITH PRESIDENT OBAMA ABOUT IT.
WITH PRESIDENT OBAMA ABOUT IT. YOU MENTIONED THE LACK OF
YOU MENTIONED THE LACK OF CONGRESSIONAL ACTION OR
CONGRESSIONAL ACTION OR EFFECTIVENESS AND I WOULD HAVE
EFFECTIVENESS AND I WOULD HAVE TO IDENTIFY OUR TWO SENATORS
TO IDENTIFY OUR TWO SENATORS FLAKE AND McCAIN WHO DID NOTHING
FLAKE AND McCAIN WHO DID NOTHING TO SUPPORT RON BARBER IN THIS
TO SUPPORT RON BARBER IN THIS EFFORT TO KEEP THE A-10.
EFFORT TO KEEP THE A-10. IT'S A SERIOUS ISSUE BECAUSE
IT'S A SERIOUS ISSUE BECAUSE EVENTUALLY IT WILL GO AWAY AND
EVENTUALLY IT WILL GO AWAY AND UNLESS THERE'S A MISSION TO
UNLESS THERE'S A MISSION TO REPLACE IT IT PUTS DM UNDER
REPLACE IT IT PUTS DM UNDER THREAT OF BASE CLOSURE.
THREAT OF BASE CLOSURE. >> WE NEED TO BE CONCERNED
>> WE NEED TO BE CONCERNED ABOUT THE DEFENSE CUTS TAKING
ABOUT THE DEFENSE CUTS TAKING PLACE.
PLACE. THEY HOLLOW OUT THE MILITARY IN
THEY HOLLOW OUT THE MILITARY IN OUR INFLUENCE AROUND THE WORLD.
OUR INFLUENCE AROUND THE WORLD. WE SEE WHAT'S GOING ON RIGHT NOW
WE SEE WHAT'S GOING ON RIGHT NOW IN UKRAINE AS A PRIME MOVER OF
IN UKRAINE AS A PRIME MOVER OF THAT.
THAT. RUSSIA MOVING TROOPS INTO
RUSSIA MOVING TROOPS INTO UKRAINE, OCCUPYING THE CRIMEA AS
UKRAINE, OCCUPYING THE CRIMEA AS WE TALK THIS EVENING.
WE TALK THIS EVENING. >> ARIZONA WILDCATS LOOK VERY
>> ARIZONA WILDCATS LOOK VERY NIGHT ON WEDNESDAY NIGHT.
NIGHT ON WEDNESDAY NIGHT. >> I'M GIVING NO MORE PREDICTION
>> I'M GIVING NO MORE PREDICTION ABOUT THE ARIZONA WILDCATS AFTER
ABOUT THE ARIZONA WILDCATS AFTER MY LAST BAD PREDICTION.
MY LAST BAD PREDICTION. >> COST HIM A WIN.
>> COST HIM A WIN. CATS GOING TO DO OKAY ON SUNDAY?
CATS GOING TO DO OKAY ON SUNDAY? >> CATS ARE BACK ON A ROLL.
>> CATS ARE BACK ON A ROLL. AND SO I PREDICT 15 POINTS
AND SO I PREDICT 15 POINTS EASILY.
EASILY. >> TAKE HIS WORD.
>> TAKE HIS WORD. >> THAT'S ONE THING YOU CAN
>> THAT'S ONE THING YOU CAN DEPEND ON HIM FOR.
DEPEND ON HIM FOR. PROGRESS N
PROGRESS N .
. >> WE'LL BE RIGHT BACK WITH SOME
>> WE'LL BE RIGHT BACK WITH SOME CLOSING THOUGHTS.