Al Qaeda operates by launching surprise attacks on civilian targets with the goal of massive casualties. Our only means for preventing future attacks, which could use WMDs, is by acquiring information...

1

annotations

Punishing abuse in Iraq should not return the U.S. to Sept. 10, 2001, in the way it fights al Qaeda, while Osama bin Laden and his top lieutenants remain at large and continue to plan attacks.

1

annotations

If the Court were to extend its reach to the base, judges could begin managing conditions of confinement, interrogation methods, and the use of information.

1

annotations

The effort to blur the lines between Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib reflects a deep misunderstanding about the different legal regimes that apply to Iraq and the war against al Qaeda.

1

annotations

Once the attacks occur, as we learned on Sept. 11, it is too late. It makes little sense to deprive ourselves of an important, and legal, means to detect and prevent terrorist attacks while we are...

1

annotations

A decision by the Supreme Court to subject Guantanamo to judicial review would eliminate these advantages.

1

annotations

This is not to condone torture, which is still prohibited by the Torture Convention and federal criminal law.

1

annotations

President Bush and his commanders announced early in the conflict that the Conventions applied.

1

annotations

It is also worth asking whether the strict limitations of Geneva make sense in a war against terrorists.

1

annotations

It is important to recognize the differences between the war in Iraq and the war on terrorism. The treatment of those detained at Abu Ghraib is governed by the Geneva Conventions, which have been...

1

annotations