Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
brian fisher is with us is with the american family association a half a
dozen that is the website
and brian had the director of issue analysis
brian for small welcome to the program
by click on the job
understand you take
offense by having the right word but i'm bridger you disagree with this decision
all you have so that it bigger us exception though to this decision i like
it
absolutely horrible and it's horrible especially for
children who are now being deprived of the opportunity to be cared for by this
couple their grandfather lee couple sixty two and sixty five
they have a great track record
with social services there in providing care for foster children mom you know
this was just the kind of home
and that you mention in your introductory remarks
but if you have children that are being ready to be placed in a foster child
situation foster parent situation they've obviously been through some kind
of major upheaval in our life some kind of major comma
you know that there could be a better place in the world for them to be done
with this couple because of their love for each other their love for god in
their love for her children so i think it's a perfectly horrible decision and i
think the reality is
that this poses a threat in general to parental rights because it's a short
step from saying okay because we think you are a homophobic bigot even though
you're not you don't hate homosexuals you love them you just don't think that
lifestyle is natural and normal and healthy but we think you're homophobic
bigots who are not going to be foster parent okay short step from bad to
saying you can't be adoptive parents
and that it's not long before that becomes a factor in whether we think
biological parents referred to raise their own children
well a lawyer you know i'm not sure you're a eagles goes to dvd is to see
those of the
and of those courses
colloquy could debate those but that's not the issue in front of us he issued
finalists is eight this judge
said that these people's religious beliefs are out of step with the united
kingdom in the united kingdom is legal for gay people to marry
gay people are considered full citizens of the united kingdom
black people are allowed to marry white people in in the united kingdom
brown people are very few can marry asian people i you know it doesn't you
know in the u_k_
it's against the evite did they think of given full recognition low after all
these long many years
the boom many varieties of us out there
and this couple
based on their religion
says their religion tells them
that this is this is wrong let's let's let's uh... didn't make it as soft as
possible
and the government says
sorry i don't care what your religion tells you if you're going to teach our
kids that's something that is legal in our nation
is wrong where i can play circuits with you
it's fully within the right to do that are they not
are absolutely not coming though you know that
what this judge said very specifically if the issue comes down to an issue of
accepting the normalization of homosexual behavior
verses deeply-held religious convictions
gay rights are going to come that every no judge said and i quote from the
ruling
is that britain is a secular state
not a theocracy
in other words this is about the laws of great britain
wouldn't acknowledges gay marriage great britain has and and solicits gays for
their military
great britain honors and gives full rights to gay citizens
and what they're saying is if we have children in our custody who for a little
more responsible we're not going to put them in the households of vegas of
people who don't recognize the law
now i just i just think i yet but i think they would you want me it would
you want justices parenthetical brian fisher
would you want
children foster children placed with white supremacists
so we've established a bit at the voters know equivalent here com your drama
ballplayer knology between white supremacist
but when you get a racial marriages
and what we're dealing with here with the radical homosexual agenda there's no
moral equivalency radical in the united kingdom it's long
business and rattle about its toll on what you want to say that the u_k_ and
most other fully developed countries spain italy mexico canada most easily
confused that they're all radical
see what you're talking about here is these people of being penalized not for
anything they've done
nobody has accused them of being mean to any homosexuals ever a single time in
their entire lives
they are being punished for what they thank and how their buyer behind florida
for asserting that they intend to siege
children
that
that full it bad for the people who have full citizen right *** in in a room for
the right shipper whatever the word is forces rights
in the country the u_k_
it are
*** them for people or should have less than those for rights or whatever
identity that
bigots are more than mean and a m more than hateful lighting that you don't
happen as a surly be run around with a torture burning crosses to be a big it
there's there's
that you know i'm ahead all the way back to ronald reagan's edo soft bigotry low
expectations they had a tree takes many forms and and and in this case
the united kingdom is saying
he or religious beliefs which conflicts with the law of the land
are therefore going to prevent you from having our kids
spoke on what you've got here then it you are supporting these people being
convicted
and up punished four camino there isn't much time or committing a plot crimes
are not the intended and i think one of these bank
everybody no exist out there without a it's all in chiapas insult believed that
american liberty
right to conscience freedom of speech freedom of conscience all those people
out there was a little here but it's not true your promises on is now what i
think i think it's what they're going to teach these children king somebody
punished for it but crime out of the appalling q
says mc they are going to teach these children bigotry
and these children are words of the stats late-night flatly reject your
thesis is that it's bigotry and hatred buying definition high-density trick
that couldn't think of how are you know you could use the word hate
we think that almost but no no i use the word here in the context of saying you
don't have to hate
you don't have to really think it could be a bit not bigotry
to say that there are enormous health risks associated with homosexual
behavior that's not bigotry that'll let symbol of the maria medical textbooks is
enormous excessive health risks associated with heterosexual behavior
the vast majority of new h_i_v_ cases for example
are women
here you know it's is it and not day when in fact the lowest rate of h_i_v_
in the world
are adding the developed countries anyway
are among lesbian women
social we just convert everybody a hall whether the lesbians because they get
the best health
well maybe the most recent sexually transmitted diseases about malachi out
about the position they have uh... before marriage and fidelity after work
for the democrats have at the solution being that the state yes
well thank you so very sensible at the scene of two brian fisher the american
family association if they've got medicine website brian thanks for
dropping by the private