Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
>>This is FFA Poultry Judging: Class 10 - Further Processed Parts
The criteria used to judge further processed poultry
meat products include:
This is an example of a chicken patty with no defect.
It has consistent coating coverage,
consistent color, consistent size and shape
and it’s complete and not married to another part
and there’s no foreign material.
>>This is an example of a coating void in a chicken patty.
The rule says that any coating void
that’s less than 1/2-inch, 0.5 inches in length,
results in no defect.
This is an example of a coating void defect.
The coating void is greater than 1/2-inch in length.
This is an example of an inconsistent coating color
defect on a chicken patty.
Any burnt or blackened crumbs on the chicken patty
result in this defect.
This is an example of a broken chicken patty
which represents a completeness defect.
This is an example of a foreign material defect
in a chicken patty.
Any non-food item that is present
represents a foreign material.
This is an example of married patties
which is a completeness defect.
This is when two patties are stuck together
during processing.
Remember, students aren’t allowed to pick up pieces
during the contest.
However, it’s being done here just to show you an example.
This is an example of a chicken tender with no defect.
Chicken tenders with no defects
should have consistent coating coverage,
consistent coating color, the correct size and shape
and no foreign materials.
This is an example of a coating void defect
on a chicken tender.
The rule states, that any coating voids
that are greater than 1/4-inch in length, 0.25 inches,
are considered a coating void defect.
This is considered an inconsistent shape defect
on a chicken tender.
The rule states that any inconsistent shape or size
or malformed pieces of chicken tender
are considered an inconsistent shape defect.
This is considered an inconsistent coating
color defect on a chicken tender.
The rule states that inconsistent color
or black or burned areas on the chicken tender
are considered inconsistent coating color.
This would be considered a completeness defect
because the chicken tender is broken in half.
This is a foreign material defect in a chicken tender.
Any non-food item is considered foreign material.
These chicken tenders were stuck together
during processing and are married.
This is considered a completeness defect.
These chicken nuggets have no defect.
Although this one looks a little misshapen,
it’s not enough to be considered an inconsistent shape.
They have consistent coating color, consistent coating coverage,
and shape and size and they are complete with no foreign material.
These nuggets have a coating void defect.
The rule states that any coating void
that’s greater than 0.25 inches, a 1/4-inch in length,
is considered a coating void defect on chicken nuggets.
These chicken nuggets have an inconsistent
coating color defect.
Any burned areas on the chicken nuggets
are considered inconsistent coating color.
This is a foreign material defect in chicken nuggets.
Any non-food item in a chicken nugget
is considered foreign material.
These chicken nuggets are married which results
in a completeness defect.
During processing, the chicken nuggets
become stuck together.
These are chicken wings with no defects.
They have consistent coating coverage,
consistent coating color, the correct size and shape,
they are complete and they have no foreign material in them.
These wings have a coating void defect.
The rule states that any coating voids
greater than 1 inch in length
are considered a coating void defect.
You can see here that these coating voids
are greater than 1 inch in length.
These wings are considered miscut
and this is a completeness defect.
These wings have an inconsistent coating
color defect.
Any burned areas in the coating
are considered inconsistent coating color.
These wings were stuck together
during processing or married.
This results in a completeness defect.
These wings have a foreign material defect.
Any non-food item in a wing is considered foreign material.
© 2012 University of Georgia College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences