Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
Darius Mathis in Georgia is getting a re trial on his *** charges
because I there was a jury they just could not agree
on his guilt there was one juror who could not find him guilty so he is
getting a retrial as a result
and the allegations include a 24-year-old woman who says
that back in 2011 she was at a CVS and that was when Darius Mathis approached
her with a gun and forced her to go into a car
and then later *** her now he claims Notre now
there's no way that that happened this was consensual sex and the reason why
it's consensual
is because I'm just too attractive to ever *** anyone
you walk hooking yeah now like that the thing is
E I've now read into it a little bit you know I'm not an expert on that incident
might trial in 11
how the twelve people thought he was guilty but I
when you hear the rest of his defense it actually seems like it's plausible
whether it's true or not is different yet he says look I was sown by couldn't
pills
in the parking lot where I was originally it was up to you know was a
mother teresa's out there
she approached me for by Clint Hill's and then she said let's get in my car
cuz I don't know the money on me I want to try to an ATM
yet so let me let me give you guys both sides because %uh both of them have
obviously very different on descriptions of what happened that day
so the *** victim alleges he told me to get in the car and i actually begged him
to take my car
I push my wallet that was in my hand and my keys toward him
and I was like please take my car you can take my car than
everything and she alleges that that wasn't enough that he wanted her to get
inside the car with him and that was when he drove off with her and *** her
he says the following: he said he was in the parking lot selling pain pills and
that the victim was
a willing buyer who agreed to write a law
matters as attorney also said he never held a gun
so there's a huge I'm contradiction there right so
did he have a gun was he armed there needs to be some sort of evidence about
I like that is being retried
I'm not going to sit here and say oh he's definitely guilty but I would make
the argument
that if you wanna have 8 credible defense
you should mention how attractive you are because the jury is immediately
gonna say
this guy's fulla *** I'm not gonna *** anyone because I'm attractive
because hot people have never *** anyone before yet such as stupid part of
your defense
and it's obnoxious and we week break no
it's such a bad idea because it gets everybody
personal in the court of public opinion you turn everyone against you because
the only be me here is
hope leave them too hot to rate everybody wants to give you the middle
finger
and into rages everybody rating and so I don't and then inside the courtroom
what's a normal reaction to that like screw you yet right
and it makes me believe you less not more
really peers that you haven't at least possible defense here
right that seems plausible whether it's true or not true
your lawyers in addition Java crapping that depends but he screwed you over
with this
I'm too pretty diverse exactly so it doesn't really help Utah living in only
her
hurts