Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
Here, we are documenting the process with which
the global agenda of the Millennium Goals is being made a reality.
Now, our approach tries to be one of meeting.
On the one hand, there is an open
but an investigative methodology of the journalist
that wants to document what exists, what has happened, who is on-ground,
why and what is he achiveing.
In other words, one that searches for facts
because he wants to inform the public about what has happened,
explaining what these objectives are and what one has to achieve.
On the other hand, an agenda needs to be analysed
during its implementation phase,
during the process of finalising its definition;
an effort of the world to give itself shared objectives
So, we are analysing an ongoing process
and we are trying to give space to those
responsible for these processes,
to narrate their own stories, for show the backstage work.
I think that this is what is interesting and innovative;
that we are not just giving news per se but giving the news
of what has occured, and so we need to give it the maximum possible objectivity
since these are facts we are collecting.
Objectively, in the sense that we are documenting what has happened
and we are parallely reading the facts through different voices
as part of a ongoing process in which all of us are responsible
and not just those who are directly implementing it.
Since it is a globally shared agenda
that is upheld by all governments, adequately or otherwise,
and since everyone is more or less involved
in supporting all governments implementing related actions,
it is an agenda that involves everyone.
It is a process in which each one of us
needs to offer his kind of participation,
also because where governments do not make adequate in-depth efforts,
there are thousands of social initiatives
that try to overcome, confront or stimulate;
and that these initiatives have a diverse capillary network
that allows persons, that want to play a role, the space to do so, positively or negatively
supporitng it or opposing it.
So, I would like to make the public aware
that we are talking about something that relates to them
as consequences
because the consequences of the global communciation climate affects everyone;
people's capacity to collaborate or not collaborate affects everyone;
as subjects that would get involved anyway by this agenda;
and as subjects that are part of this agenda being implemented
as funders, supporters or opposers
Subtitles by the Amara.org community